How Big Tech, Antifa, MSM Are Using Aggression, Suppression and Censorship to Reinforce D Narratives Q

Posted by Dobrien 3 years, 9 months ago to History
4 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

4553
How Big Tech, Antifa, MSM Are Using Aggression, Suppression and Censorship to Reinforce D Narratives
Q
!!Hs1Jq13jV6
1 Jul 2020 - 9:00:01 AM
How do you demonstrate 'reasonable cause' to regulate and/or break up BIG TECH?
What is the common theme/tactic of the LEFT?
Define 'Fascism'.
Forcible suppression of opposition?
Define 'Censorship'.
The institution, system, or practice of censoring?
Define 'Narrative'.
A way of presenting or understanding a situation or series of events that reflects and promotes a particular point of view or set of values?
Define 'Projection'.
The attribution of one's own ideas, feelings, or attitudes to other people or to objects; especially : the externalization of blame, guilt, or responsibility as a defense against anxiety?
The forming of a plan : scheming?
Define 'Psychological Projection'.
A theory in psychology in which the human ego defends itself against unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive and negative) by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others?
Define 'Narcissist'.
A person who has an excessive interest in or admiration of themselves: narcissists who think the world revolves around them | narcissists preening themselves in front of the mirror?
Define 'Dogma'.
A point of view or tenet put forth as authoritative without adequate grounds?
Define 'Aggression'.
Forceful and sometimes overly assertive pursuit of one's aims and interests?
Define 'Suppression'.
The action of suppressing something such as an activity or publication?
[Bonus Round]
'Narcissists' are renowned for using 'psychological projection' to blame other people, even when it is entirely apparent that they are the ones in the wrong.
——————————–
Define 'Realism'.
The quality or fact of representing a person, thing, or situation accurately or in a way that is true to life?
[Realism]
Actions of [ANTIFA]:
-Aggression (Projection)
-Suppression (Fascism)
-Censorship (Narrative-Dogma)
Actions of [FAKE NEWS]:
-Aggression (Projection)
-Suppression (Fascism)
-Censorship (Narrative-Dogma)
Actions of [TWITTER, FB, GOOG, YT, REDDIT, etc..]:
-Aggression (Projection)
-Suppression (Fascism)
-Censorship (Narrative-Dogma)
MSDNC pushes coordinated FAKE, FALSE, MISLEADING DISINFORMATION based on a biased [D] political viewpoint [controlled mouthpiece(s)].
Blue checkmarks then defend and attack [target] opposing viewpoints using slander, aggression, suppression, group-think, etc. [suppression tactics].
Non-blue checkmarks then defend and promote attacker(s) [blues] viewpoint(s) [leftwing 'cult'] to instill echo_chamber wall-to-wall amplified narrative for each designated subject.
Select [public discovery] topics are deemed and ranked in priority order [ranking determines use of assets [big-to-small]].
[How to herd the sheep (you) 101]
If you do not follow [remain in-line] with their political viewpoints you are deliberately made to feel in the minority [isolated] and inferior [using aggression-slander].
[If majority thinks x then x must be true _projected false reality _minority projected as majority using news _ social media platforms to spotlight designated viewpoints [the 'narrative']].
A public (person) that thinks for themselves [independent free-thought] is what they are afraid of most [loss of control].
Q


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by Lucky 3 years, 9 months ago
    Censorship. A proper definition should describe the action/effect rather than depend on who does it.
    If by definition only government can do it, the same thing done by Big Tec is not the same thing.
    Or, is it the thing/action/effect which matters? Is the effect the same but different only in extent/degree? If so, and denies free speech or employment, is it acceptable if done by personal whim? What if anything should be done to stop it? What justification can be used to stop censorship with a wider definition while keeping to Objectivism? Is the effect so bad that Objectivism needs to be revised or over-ruled?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Lucky 3 years, 9 months ago
    Fascism, a definition

    A philosophy that considers people to have importance only in respect of their membership of a class or organization. The organizations have importance depending on their support for the State to which all affiliation and loyalty ultimately belong.
    Example- the UK health service (should be called medical/hospital system), has been described as a medical system with a government attached. In the recent CCP19 scare, patients were removed from hospital, whatever their condition, in order to prevent over-loading the hospitals, the slogan was To Save The Health Service. Overloading if any was negligible, some wards remained empty, but many patients thus removed, died. The patient as individual did not matter, only the institutions mattered.
    The essence of fascism.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo