10

Hydroxychloroquine - How Well Has it Worked Against COVID-19 ?

Posted by freedomforall 2 months ago to News
20 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

The attached charts show
(1) death rates in countries that use Hydroxychloroquine compared to countries that do not use Hydroxychloroquine
(2) results in Morocco before and after Hydroxychloroquine was accepted as treatment
(3) Lower fatality rate in Brazil after Hydroxychloroquine was accepted as treatment while case rates increased


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by BCRinFremont 2 months ago
    On my numerous trips to malaria zones, I always used one form or another of HCQ. The side effect warning was a bit ominous regarding mental problems that might develop. Nonetheless, I and my young family never had any side effects.

    I concur with someone who recently said, regarding another issue, “What have you got to lose?”
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by GaryL 2 months ago
    "NO LIVES MATTER"! Just follow the money. a standard dose of HCQ costs about $12 while a standard dose of remdesivir is around $3,000. Many of the countries in the Green zone are where malaria is common and HCQ is sold OTC alongside of aspirin. I have heard that King Fucci has his fingers in the financials of the remdesivir maker.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by term2 2 months ago
      I also heard that when they give you remdesivir, its known to negatively affect the liver A LOT. They have to monitor liver enzymes and when they get %x normal levels, they have to stop the treatment until the damage comes down. Doesnt sound like a very safe drug to me...
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 2 months ago
    Thanks for the great information. With all the FUD going around about COVID-19, this is a welcome breath of fresh air. Minus the face mask, of course. ;)
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Lucky 2 months ago
    That first one is nice and easy to read.
    Of course there are many complications, but the message is clear that HCQ works. I could be convinced otherwise, you'd need very strong evidence indeed.

    Meanwhile, take a look at
    http://www.francesoir.fr/societe-sant...
    ..or.
    https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics...

    -- Swiss agency collected all data, HCQ used in Switzerland for CCP19, death rate fluctuated, slight decline. Then the big fake Lancet article came out, WHO reacted fast- HCQ is dangerous and should not be used!
    The Swiss stopped use of HCQ, the death rate shot up, stayed high. Then the Lancet retracted, death rate dropped back to where is was before.
    This is very strong evidence for using HCQ
    .
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo