Not only that but if the intended recipient knows that one is issued for than and tries to avoid it, they can be held in contempt for that act. At least in some jurisdictions.

I believe you are correct. There is no such defense as "refusing" to accept the subpoena. You refuse on pain of contempt of court and can be tried in absentia and convicted of that - and promptly thrown in jail where you will then rot until you comply with the subpoena - by force if necessary.

Of course, any tiresome for antiquated laws do not apply to our more than equal Jackass Party elite betters.
We The (smelly Walmart) People are to know our places and shut up and sit down just like we're supposed to.
I mean, who the heck do we think we are? Them? That would be racist.
And who among us little nothings could survive being called a racist by some lefty pinhead?
Oh, the horror! The horror!

I may be wrong (sure wouldn't be the first time), but I always thought that once the subpoena "recipient" was identified by the process server, the subpoena was considered to have been served even if it was refused.

If I'm right, then she has been legally served and is now required by law to comply.

As many as they want....they are Democrats....the laws don't apply to them.

Yep...I was just countin the days until his involvement was revealed...just knew it had to be so.

Deep state looting pig has his finger prints all over the crime scenes.

Biden was involved TOO! http://truedaily.news/2019/05/24/bidens-role-in-russiagate-revealed/

Beautiful image!

If only in our dreams...

Tap this link for an image of trumps tweet.
https://images.app.goo.gl/7LdvimgMBNx...

How many serious blunders can these people commit before someone screams 'Treason'!