This is an eons-old contest between two notions of how the world's resources (though effectively all are renewable except the sun itself) should be used: (1) There are a huge number of souls waiting to be born, so we should breed like flies and live poorly in order that as many should live as possible; or (2) The purpose of civilization and of intelligence is to make life comfortable, so any conservation needed should be accomplished by individuals being responsible enough not to have kids they can't afford to make rich.
I'm squarely on side (2) because I've found zero evidence to support view (1).
View (1), and the related view that theft should be tolerated, completely explain why Africa and south Asia are poor. I hope that colonialism becomes cheap enough again for those cultures to be wiped out and replaced, so that nobody has to live poor unless he himself earns it by screwing up.
They want us divided. BLM was not a grass roots movement. It was contrived to create racial angst . Like Spike Lee and Oprah talk about how oppressed they are in America yet they life like kings and queens. MLK used as a revered lightning rod and as a rallying tool , yet his statement “Judge a man not on the color of his skin but on the content of his character” That statement is ignored.
Before white (or other) people started eating this way, a lot more (%-wise) of the world's population was starving to death. I am not about to listen to the notion that we should starve for the sake of worrying about "climate change".
The plan to implement Technocracy includes socialism then communism to be finally replaced by Technocracy. In its most extreme sense technocracy is an entire government running as a technical or engineering problem and is mostly hypothetical. In more practical use, technocracy is any portion of a bureaucracy that is run by technologists. When you hear sustainability you are often hearing a subjective hypothesis. One The is Brought to you by the State Science institute. The Ecology movement was born from Technocracy brought to the world by Maurice Strong with Rockefeller’s aid.
Most of the contents of the original article are laughable. But is doesn't get really funny until the end. Copied under 'Fair Use' clauses of copyright law: -----------------------------------------------------------------
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors want to thank the peer reviewers for improving this paper. Also, the authors would like to thank Dr. Dana Boyer at the University of Minnesota for her insights on FEW nexus research.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Other than being unsightly to man, I suspect that most plastic tossed into the environment has no more impact than a rock. Of course, if you go to some places the people don't seem to mind plastic stuff lying all about like a bunch of rocks.
If the 'Looney Liberals' would quit voting in lockstep and drop their hatred they might find some legislation to help the many Americans who cannot afford health insurance. Their sacred O'Bama Care isn't making it!
I think plastic is doing a lot of the damage. I am puzzled. My local HEB Grocery store just raised the price on a plastic container of Rice from $5.95 to $7.95! The amount of a box of this same rice containing the amount of rice in the plastic container, costs $3.98! Why are they charging $4 more for the plastic container?
To hell with "climate change" arguments. The climate is what it is, controlled by very large forces we dont have control over. We should tend to dealing with the climate instead of trying to change it.
I'll be enjoying my white guilt to the max as I add plenty of cow to a stew me dino will make and devour today, Do believe it was a Texas Chainsaw Massacre sequel in which I heard an actor playing one of those dear cannibals say, "Never skimp on the meat." Me dino has followed that advice ever since! Me have collected all the veggies, but that stew will have all the ample meats. Why? I'm a white dino-- Hear me ROAR!
I'm squarely on side (2) because I've found zero evidence to support view (1).
View (1), and the related view that theft should be tolerated, completely explain why Africa and south Asia are poor. I hope that colonialism becomes cheap enough again for those cultures to be wiped out and replaced, so that nobody has to live poor unless he himself earns it by screwing up.
MLK used as a revered lightning rod and as a rallying tool , yet his statement “Judge a man not on the color of his skin but on the content of his character” That statement is ignored.
Oh really? Are we supposed to eat grass? Or bananas that grow on trees and don't need watering?
What is next? We will be blamed for breathing more air than Latinos or blacks.
Egad!
Unlimited capacity for hatred - that is what the left is.
Let's all eat our way back to health and prosperity!
(I know I plagiarized some of this...)
The state science institute knows best.
In its most extreme sense technocracy is an entire government running as a technical or engineering problem and is mostly hypothetical. In more practical use, technocracy is any portion of a bureaucracy that is run by technologists. When you hear sustainability you are often hearing a subjective hypothesis. One The is Brought to you by the State Science institute.
The Ecology movement was born from Technocracy brought to the world by Maurice Strong with Rockefeller’s aid.
Copied under 'Fair Use' clauses of copyright law:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors want to thank the peer reviewers for improving this paper. Also, the authors would like to thank Dr. Dana Boyer at the University of Minnesota for her insights on FEW nexus research.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Do believe it was a Texas Chainsaw Massacre sequel in which I heard an actor playing one of those dear cannibals say, "Never skimp on the meat."
Me dino has followed that advice ever since!
Me have collected all the veggies, but that stew will have all the ample meats.
Why?
I'm a white dino--
Hear me ROAR!
Load more comments...