Was this valid questioning or just an attack?
Seems, based on her obvious religious persuasion that she isn't one to be asking questions about human rights.
Let the debating begin.
Let the debating begin.
- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
The current discussion here is about political manipulation for which one should reject the tactics with explanation, not just "question" the premise. The circus atmosphere manipulations often prevent full honest rebuttal, but you can usually at least start by rejecting the premises in refusing to sanction the misrepresentation. Don't waffle by only "questioning" it, then losing the ability to explain further in the kangaroo proceedings.
Congress could regain some needed credibility by expelling her now.
The chairman of that circus should be boiled in oil for letting her continue with her tirade.
What a detestable, despicable display of unwarranted derision by a degenerate demagogue! The people of Minnesota should be reigning in this rabid beast.
Radio Randy was right. The Chairman that silently presided over that 3rd degree abuse should be reprimanded. The "congresswoman" should be removed from office.
If I were Mr. Abrams, I would have given her a piece of my mind so she had something to take up some of the vacuum between her ears, then I would have walked out.
Is this the future? a new Moorish invasion here in America?
This is how a great nation is destroyed from within... People invite in and vote their culture's demise...
Galt! what is wrong with people?
Regards,
OA
No one can blame the Somalian community for coming out for her in droves. In their own country they wouldn't be able to vote. This was an exciting and privileged time for them. That's what makes her behavior so far so disappointing.
This isn't about being a Muslim or anti-Semitic; this is about lacking the experience in tone and action to be a responsible representative to her constituents.
This imbecile (Omar) is so full of herself and her "seat of power over others" that she couldn't hide the smirk as she pontificated (if such a word applies to a Muslim) her nonsense. She couldn't even read the script from her imam handlers. She started off by addressing Abrams as "Mr. Adams", so she can't even read his name correctly and stuttered through the rest as if she were just catching on to the English language. One word comes to mind every time I see or hear her: taqiyya.
She is a radical muslim, idiotic barker wearing femininist, marxist barbarian with no conscience, no introspection and no intellect what so ever.
In its fullest form it is a complete, total, 100% system of life.
Islam has religious, legal, political, economic, social and military components. The religious component is a beard for all the others.
Islamization begins when there are sufficient number of Muslims in a country to agitate for their religious privileges.
When politically correct, tolerant and culturally diverse societies agree to Muslim demands for their religious privileges, some of the other components tend to creep in as well.
Here is how it works:
As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will be for the most part regarded as a peace loving minority.
When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. See France.
Any non-Muslim action offends Islam and results in uprising and threats, such as in Amsterdam, with opposition to Mohammed cartoons.
After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-triggering rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues.
This goes on to 80%, when nations can expect daily intimidation, State run ethnic cleansing, beheadings, stoning, and genocide as these nations drive out the infidels.
She quickly adopted Harris's arrogant questioning "style". Asking loaded questions and demanding a Yes or No reply is manipulative with the only goal to trap the victim.
For her outsized arrogance she is an analphabet. She can't even read from a printed text.
Minn can surely be proud of their selection as their rep!
"Analphabet" What a perfect word!
I shall remember it.
Regards,
OA
Mostly used in Europe. In the US "illiterate" is more common.
There must be rules for that type of hearing about whether Congresswomen can make non-question statements, ask questions with complicated premises, and ask absurd questions like if they think massacres are great.