The green New Deal: No plan like this has been seen since “The John Galt Plan”

Posted by Solver 5 years, 3 months ago to Politics
67 comments | Share | Flag

“The Green New Deal resolution a 10-year plan to mobilize every aspect of American society at a scale not seen since World War 2 to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions and create economic prosperity for all. It will:

 Move America to 100% clean and renewable energy
 Create millions of family supporting-wage, union jobs
 Ensure a just transition for all communities and workers to ensure economic security for people and communities that have historically relied on fossil fuel industries
 Ensure justice and equity for frontline communities by prioritizing investment, training, climate and community resiliency, economic and environmental benefits in these communities.
 Build on FDR’s second bill of rights by guaranteeing:
A job with a family-sustaining wage, family and medical leave, vacations, and retirement security
High-quality education, including higher education and trade schools
Clean air and water and access to nature
Healthy food
High-quality health care
Safe, affordable, adequate housing
Economic environment free of monopolies
Economic security for all who are unable or unwilling to work

National mobilization our economy through 14 infrastructure and industrial projects. Every project strives to remove greenhouse gas emissions and pollution from every sector of our economy:
o Build infrastructure to create resiliency against climate change-related disasters
o Repair and upgrade U.S. infrastructure. ASCE estimates this is $4.6 trillion at minimum.
o Meet 100% of power demand through clean and renewable energy sources
o Build energy-efficient, distributed smart grids and ensure affordable access to electricity
o Upgrade or replace every building in US for state-of-the-art energy efficiency
o Massively expand clean manufacturing (like solar panel factories, wind turbine factories, battery and storage manufacturing, energy efficient manufacturing components) and remove pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from manufacturing
o Work with farmers and ranchers to create a sustainable, pollution and greenhouse gas free, food system that ensures universal access to healthy food and expands independent family farming
o Totally overhaul transportation by massively expanding electric vehicle manufacturing, build charging stations everywhere, build out high- speed rail at a scale where air travel stops becoming necessary, create affordable public transit available to all, with goal to replace every combustion-engine vehicle
o Mitigate long-term health effects of climate change and pollution
o Remove greenhouse gases from our atmosphere and pollution through afforestation, preservation, and other methods of restoring our natural
ecosystems
o Restore all our damaged and threatened ecosystems
o Clean up all the existing hazardous waste sites and abandoned sites o Identify new emission sources and create solutions to eliminate those
emissions
o Make the US the leader in addressing climate change and share our
technology, expertise and products with the rest of the world to bring
about a global Green New Deal.”
https://assets.documentcloud.org/docu...

And a response:
https://thefederalist.com/2019/02/07/...


All Comments

  • Posted by exceller 5 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    "it would increase wages while lowering prices"

    Yes, that is the logic of the looting left.

    EVERYTHING this woman dragged up in her unlimited and unhindered-by-facts "vision" can be characterized by the same idea.

    As a simple exercise, Cortez should play with a scale, balance it out with equal weights on both sides, then gradually take weight off of one side and add it to the other. Would she be wondering why the scale would lean heavily to one side, in this case the deficit site?

    It is an enigma what was she studying in her economic class and how did she graduate cum laude?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 5 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    You are gona WISH it was warming Circuit...view my earth cycles of disaster series.

    Sure could use your imput on how to protect our electronic infrastructure under the conditions presented in this series.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 5 years, 3 months ago
    One burp from the sun and all those worthless infurstructure changes goes down the drain and we will have to retreat back to the caves.

    Progressive, marxist platform:

    At first I thought this was funny...then I realized the awful truth of it.


    Tax his land,
    Tax his bed,
    Tax the table
    At which he's fed.

    Tax his tractor,
    Tax his mule,
    Teach him taxes
    Are the rule

    Tax his work,
    Tax his pay,
    He works for peanuts
    Anyway!

    Tax his cow,
    Tax his goat,
    Tax his pants,
    Tax his coat.

    Tax his ties,
    Tax his shirt,
    Tax his work,
    Tax his dirt.

    Tax his tobacco,
    Tax his drink,
    Tax him if he
    Tries to think.

    Tax his cigars,
    Tax his beers,
    If he cries
    Tax his tears.

    Tax his car,
    Tax his gas,
    Find other ways
    To tax his ass.

    Tax all he has
    Then let him know
    That you won't be done
    Till he has no dough.

    When he screams and hollers,
    Then tax him some more,
    Tax him till
    He's good and sore.

    Then tax his coffin,
    Tax his grave,
    Tax the sod in
    Which he's laid.

    Put these words
    Upon his tomb,
    "Taxes drove me to my doom..."

    When he's gone,
    Do not relax,
    Its time to apply
    The inheritance tax.

    Accounts Receivable Tax
    Building Permit Tax
    CDL license Tax
    Cigarette Tax
    Corporate Income Tax
    Dog License Tax
    Excise Taxes
    Federal Income Tax
    Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA)
    Fishing License Tax
    Food License Tax
    Fuel Permit Tax
    Gasoline Tax (44.75 cents per gallon)
    Gross Receipts Tax
    Hunting License Tax
    Inheritance Tax
    Inventory Tax
    IRS Interest Charges IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax)
    Liquor Tax
    Luxury Taxes
    Marriage License Tax
    Medicare Tax
    Personal Property Tax
    Property Tax
    Real Estate Tax
    Service Charge Tax
    Social Security Tax
    Road Usage Tax
    Sales Tax
    Recreational Vehicle Tax
    School Tax
    State Income Tax
    State Unemployment Tax (SUTA) Telephone Federal Excise Tax
    Telephone Federal Universal Service Fee Tax
    Telephone Federal, State and Local Surcharge Taxes
    Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax
    Telephone Recurring & Non-recurring Charges Tax
    Telephone State and Local Tax
    Telephone Usage Charge Tax
    Utility Taxes
    Vehicle License Registration Tax
    Vehicle Sales Tax
    Watercraft Registration Tax
    Well Permit Tax
    Workers Compensation Tax

    STILL THINK THIS IS FUNNY?

    Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago, and our nation was the most prosperous in the world.

    We had absolutely no national debt, had the largest middle class in the world, and Mom stayed home to raise the kids.

    What in the hell happened? Can you spell "politicians?"

    And I still have to "press 1" for English!?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 25n56il4 5 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I think if you check Article II of the Constitution Ms Harris is not eligible to run for President and that would probably rule out VP. Her parents were not citizens and she therefore is not 'Natural' born. Her parents had not been here in this country the required five years waiting period to be citizens! She is native born and therefore eligible to be a Senator!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 5 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I do think that the dems are launching trial balloons to see what stays up at this point. None of the people that are announcing they are candidates will be presidential candidate. Perhaps they will show themselves to be good VP candidates, such as Kamala Harris for her "blackness and womanhood". The rest of the early people running have no chance to do anything except get a job in a democratic administration. I still think O'Rourke will rush in at the appropriate late time to steal the show for dems.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 25n56il4 5 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    They seem to be multiplying! I listed to that new one Ami (whatever) today and she just joined the group with here 'green' ideas. And she didn't once mention the Military or Veterans, to whom we owe so much. Makes me wonder?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 5 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Obama was a no name allso with no accomplishments. Pocahontas, warren, and booker will fizzle our due to their mean demeanors

    They have a year to quiet my polish o rourkr.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 5 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    O'Rourke is being promoted as "the next JFK," despite the fact he has no accomplishments to support that contention. He's an empty suit with no extemporaneous speaking skills, and has at least two strikes against him, being "pale and male." His senator opponents (Harris, Warren, Gillibrand, Sanders, Booker) have more experience at debate, and he would do poorly against them. He has little name recognition, so he wouldn't have the small contributor draw. The question would be if the party couldn't unseat Ted Cruz by spending an enormous sum on O'Rourke, why would it be anxious to spend another enormous sum on him in an attempt to unseat Trump?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 5 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I think you are underestimating the appeal of O'rourke. He damn near unseated Cruz, which is a major thing for an unknown. The dems will put a lot of $$ behind O'Rourke and he has a good year to become more polished. After all, Obama came from the shadows to win the presidency and he knew relatively nothing and was a complete liar in what he said.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 5 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    They can always sell the Hawaiian islands to pay for the interest on the greatly increased national debt.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 5 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I had to laugh when even "Crazie Maizie" Hirono said that eliminating air travel might be a problem for her state of Hawaii.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 5 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    All we need to do is invent a replicator, and a transporter, like they have on Star Trek. Warp drive and holodecks would also be nice.

    When you wish upon a star...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 5 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    What's really unnerving is that his speeches are nothing but progressive gibberish, without a grain of fact or logic, but progressive voters think he's just too wise for the rest of us to understand him. It's the same inane process that has these idiots proclaiming how AOC is so brilliant for her statements like "We need to invent technology that hasn't been invented yet" when asked about how her "Green New Deal" was going to be done.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 25n56il4 5 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Thanks for your remarks about O'Rourke. I thought it was just me and I was prejudiced because I like Ted Cruz. But I was puzzled why some intelligent Democrats (known to me) were supporting this poor dumb person who couldn't even talk!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LibertyBelle 5 years, 3 months ago
    I've heard some of it on the radio. It is absolutely outrageous. There was a time when it would not have even been uttered (in public); when even people who might have been planning it would have denied it, and accused people of making it up. But why now? Because people's ideas of right and justice have been distorted until they no longer believe in right or justice.It seems to me that this is another result of the philosophy that people have been taught in college, the notion that "there are no absolutes" (including rights of man which should be inviolable), and the desire to destroy what is left of free enterprise. Can we fight it? At this point? We have to do the best we can.
    I think that if this country is to be saved, the home-school movement will be instrumental.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by jimjamesjames 5 years, 3 months ago
    To AOC:  Create millions of family supporting-wage, union jobs

    Go ahead, do that this year and I'll be on board.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 5 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Not only is O'Rourke a socialist, he isn't competent enough to explain his policies. Compared to O'Rourke, Dubya was a great orator. The Dems spent more than ten times the amount Cruz did, and O'Rourke still lost. Not all voters are as stupid as the ones who voted for O'Rourke.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by j_IR1776wg 5 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    "Wait until the "oh-so-concerned" crowd realizes that this eliminates Amazon Prime two-day shipping!"

    No No Cortez must go
    No No Cortez must go :-)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Lucky 5 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I like that. The progressives/regressives admire Venezuela, no need to stop at admiration, they can imitate. How long did Maduro take? The economy was bad when he took over from Chavez, now people are starving.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • -1
    Posted by CircuitGuy 5 years, 3 months ago
    This is so wrong-headed, conflating protecting the environment, which I see as property-rights issue, with all kinds of excuses for gov't to intrude. Global warming is one of the biggest problems of our time, and I don't see it being solved through government intrusiveness, i.e. gov't programs to upgrade buildings and setting hard limits on greenhouse gases. I am concerned it's a double-whammy that won't address climate change and will actually manage to create new problems as big as climate change. I suspect it's a marketing ploy, a concept car never meant to be built. Maybe this is the way policy must be sold. When libertarians show their crazy concept cars, people dismiss them as kooks.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 5 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I saw a few out takes of W. Talk about a bumbling idiot. But he got elected ! The dens are likely to rally behind o’rourke’s boyish charm. After all the USA president is primarily a front man for the party
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo