Absolutely. I dont want to hear liberal arguments any more. They are bullshit.

CNN, MSNBC, CBS etc, etc, etc are all one-sided.
Fox should strive harder to be a counterweight against all the lib propaganda that's often read off the same page distributed, I reckon, by some central authority in the Jackass Party.

Fair and balanced is like giving right and wrong equal weight. They are letting the two sides fight it out on the air with one side using reason and the other side emotion.

Its just silly, and who wants to watch that

Totally agree with your choices. I even subscribed to CRTV so I can listen to Levin whenever I want to his podcasts. I think FOX is going to lose their position if they keep on spending airtime on loonie tunes

Yes, I have been saying that for a long time, e.g. that Tucker is doing it wrong. Unless he is instructed to do so from above. I am sure we are not the only ones pointing this out.

And you are correct on " I just want to hear some positive comments on what we should do."

O'Reilly never allowed the left take over the show. I'll never forget his pitch battle with Geraldo Rivera regarding immigration.That is why they purged him on the convenient pretext of harassment.

Re: Unintended Consequences (novel by John Ross)
The arms of most librarians reach much farther than the physical bookshelves in the building. Most of the books I desired during 30 years of teaching were not in the small community college library. Solution: Request the book through inter-library loan. Sometimes this would reach much farther than you would expect. My CC received and supplied a book of poetry to a request from a Moscow Russia library.

Hannity calls Levin The Great One, gives him a spot to opine about something at least once a week and doesn't play patty cake with loonies like Tucker does.
Me dino agrees that Levin is great and thinks Hannity is pretty good. When I watch Tucker I'm driven to channel surf away within the first 20 minutes.

I dont attack the leftists on the street, although they would deserve it for stealing money from me and forcing me to obey their insane laws.

As to FOX, I wont watch the airhead eye candy anchors who always seem to give idiot leftists air time. I already know what the idiots are going to say- I just want to hear some positive comments on what we should do.

Tucker seems to give way too much air time to the idiots. he does make them look a bit stupid, but I dont need to spend time watching that.

My favorite FOX program is Life, Liberty, and Levin.

Yes. I always wonder when I tune to Fox what "fair and balanced" entails?

Sure, it is the leading channel by viewer count, but the price is that we must endure the hypocrisy of the left when the anchors put them on the air.

The difference is that we don't attack them on the street, restaurants or supermarkets, only try to reason with them.

After the Kavanaugh circus was over, Tucker put a woman on the air from some woman's rights groups and asked her about Kavanaugh. I knew what was going to follow and I am sure Trucker did, too. The woman hysterically accused Kavanaugh of lying demanding that he must be unbarred. When Tucker interjected that his accuser was unable to bring any proof, she replied that "a woman's voice must be enough". In other words, if a woman decides tomorrow that she dislikes her neighbor for whatever reason then accuses him of sexual assault, that accusation must have a 100% credibility. No proof needed.

These are the characters we should treat in a civilized way, which we sill do. Mind you, they don't return the favor: Clinton said the left will not be civil until regains power.

No worries, gharkness.
It is a shame that someone hasn't already done it legally. Looks like an opportunity to me, but perhaps the author has reasons not to license the digital distribution.

The establishment had become very strong, no doubt. At some point, Trump just needs to just use his powers to the fullest extent and take what comes. If he holds himself back, he just lets them win by default.

I think Ben Shapiro tweeted something like: Left-wing supporter shoots at Republican Congress members, it's the supporter's fault. Right-wing supporter sends bombs to leading Democrats, it's the GOP's fault.
I would like to add: White supremacist who hates Trump because he believes Trump is controlled by the Jews, shoots up Pittsburgh synagogue, it's Trump's fault.
At least, according to the left-wing media.

That's very interesting.

Talking aboiut all those stickers, a caller to the Rush Limbaugh Show said Sayok might as well had also put up a neon sign that said, "I did it! Come arrest me!"

Well, maybe he is a modern day Ragnar.

I dont think he wanted to kill anyone, or he could have easily done it. He will sit in jail until he dies I am sure, courtesy of our pocketbooks.

As you obviously already know, this is why Trump has not used his power to stop all that BS for the last two years.
The name of this game is called political survival.

Maybe he wanted his 5 min of fame but didnt want to maim or kill. Maybe he read AS and liked Ragnar. If that was it, I cant fault him really

I doubt the propaganda arm of the left will ever allow the Russian thing to be over and done. If he does what you outline, the media will spend the next two years accusing him of burying the truth by s**tcanning everyone who could have exposed that truth.

Evidently, all this terrorist wanted to do was to terrorize.

That is still a possibility.

Too bad the mad bomber wasn't crazy enough to blow himself up at the get-go.

Consider yourself forgiven at least by a dinosaur. :-)

He was a registered Democrat although I heard his history has been erased.

Me dino understands. Such crap is always pulled at the last minute.

This could be a big reason why the book is out of print. Too much competition from looters.