I consider any use of a "smart meter" by the government to be search and seizure. The point where I differ from the judges on this case is where the search is "reasonable". They must have ignored the part of the Fourth Amendment where it specifically notes that ANY search must be accompanied by a WARRANT specifically detailing what is to be searched and (optionally) seized. Given that there is no standing warrant, by definition these searches are unConstitutional.

What say you?