- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
Way, way worse, why am I making that comparison with a persecuted scientist during the 21st Century?
Way worser than that, why is this happening in the United States Of America?
I think its the latter because they could always alter the process without telling the public as if they found a better way; therefore saving their collective asses.
Somebody tweet President Trumpet and suggest he investigate the "Vaccine Courts".
It is telling, when your boss comes to you and insists you deny the conclusions of your honest work and when you refuse...they put you in jail!
The biggest difference is that pharma has to contend with three major handicaps that force them to raise the prices they charge Americans: (1) Overregulation; (2) unfair product liability law (including the lack of a loser-pays rule); and (3) the fact that every other rich country in the world, whether it allows competition with the state-run health service or not, imposes price controls on drugs, thereby forcing American consumers to pay for all of Big Pharma's R&D budget.
I believe the only sensible solution is for Big Pharma to mount a PR campaign explaining to the public that government causes all three problems, and urging the public to demand that government stop causing them.
They also assume that what ever they do is ok and care not how many react badly to their concoctions; neither do they track what their perversions do to people over time.
My concussion is, big pharma is Not your friend.
I could care less how much they profit so long as they do no harm to the end users of their products...so far, it seems, they have done nothing but harm. They know nothing of what makes each of us different nor why, one man's medicine is another man's poison.
Oddly enough, there is a parallel mystical nonsense belief that the Earth's ecosystem is perfectly self-regulating. Many, but not all, of the same people buy into both.
Allopathic medicine has Never done Anything good for me...it's only made matters worse and cause other problems to boot.
25 years away from their so called science has proven that to me. No colds, flu, pain, cancer, ebola...Nothing in 25 years!
Just hoppen the old ugly body of old ugly Carl holds out.
You want Mysticism?...knock on wood...laughing
For all their blather about "mobilizing" against a "crisis" they never mention the harm they are causing to innocent people being made to unnecessarily suffer pain and pay the artificially escalating costs for pain medication as the statists take over the right of highly educated, dedicated doctors and other medical professionals to think and act within their own profession.
It's every bit as real as our gun violence epidemic and healthcare crisis, i.e. not real.
I wonder what would happen if they just stopped the whole thing and went back to what we had 100 years ago, when you could just walk into a drug store and get your heroin in powder, tincture, or whatever format you wanted. Maybe it would be a disaster, but I actually think freed from the need to have a high potency, for smuggling purposes, you'd see people going to more easily measured doses and buying more long-acting opiods with less of a rush and crash. War proponents will say that some people might crash their car, get addicted, or run their lives, but that's happening now. The question is if it would happen more or less. And even if the problem got a little worse, how much war is worth stopping it. We could reduce drugs, kidnapping, robbery, etc if we instituted a police state with random searches of all houses and a need for papers granting permission to travel anywhere.
I really think it's a the phony emergency du jour. It's almost on the spectrum of "human traffic" kidnappings of ordinary people going about their normal daily business or "satanism" in the 80s-- complete fiction.
HHS labels gun ownership as a "crisis", too. They would rather torture millions of people than leave it up to individual adults to make their own risk/reward decisions as we are entitled.
So, do you really think that there isn't an actual problem with opioid addiction in this country?
Oh, and FWIW, I personally know many dumb asses in the medical industry. Almost all of them are doctors. These people aren't gods. Shoot, I know of a local one who actually claims that he is the messiah, and prescribes himself a bunch of pain killers. Haha!
Years ago there some legitimate patients who, like Rush Limbaugh, apparently did not realize the seriousness of risk for addition (and did not contend with it properly). For years afterwords the so called "epidemic" has been about drug junkies. Doctors are fed up with being blamed for it and controlled by government policies insisting on taking over their professional decisions.
Please review the guidelines for posting here and take your "HaHa" taunting, loutish posts elsewhere.
In the ’90s, Purdue Pharma’s OxyContin debuted. Doctors started talking about doing a better job of treating pain. Purdue created a video promotion sent to doctors’ offices that showcased patients who had reclaimed their lives from chronic pain, and an expert in the videos claimed the drugs came without serious side effects.
Sales of the painkillers mushroomed, and during the first years of this century, pain management through opioid prescriptions became the expectation.
In 2011, Portenoy and others began reversing their recommendations as addictions to opioids, either prescription drugs or illegals like heroin, began to rise.
“Clearly,” Portenoy said, “if I had an inkling of what I know now then, I wouldn’t have spoken in the way that I spoke. It was clearly the wrong thing to do.”
A recent report in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Internal Medicine suggests that it might be time to reexamine this issue, particularly the relationship between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry. Some of the findings are leaving many reeling and questioning whether or not they can even trust their own doctor. Among the more pertinent, and alarming, of the results is how easily doctors can be persuaded to prescribe drugs like brand-name statins (lipid and cholesterol-lowering medications) by pharmaceutical manufacturers. The research included nearly 2,500 physicians.
Freedom is based on the moral principle that the individual's fundamental means of living is to think and act for himself; statism insists that we are all incompetent to think and must be told what to believe and do. Doctors do not do whatever "Big Pharma" salesmen tell them to do, and doctors are becoming increasingly alarmed and angry at the combination of intrusions and insults.
Pompous statements like "President Donald J. Trump has mobilized his entire Administration to address opioid abuse by directing the declaration of a nationwide Public Health Emergency" are typical of the statist rhetoric demanding to "mobilize" for an "emergency" in all realms of our lives.
and: https://www.nature.com/news/2011/1110...
Other scientist validated or otherwise were on the same track but lacked the balls to stick up for their work.
Running anything thru an animal brain to reduce toxicity has got to present problems like bacteria/viruses etc that are present in that animal...would of never posed harm to humans unless one eats mouse brains breakfast...even ole Dino knows better.
Her case is not that much different from the "consensus" based belief of the "scientific community" in the human cause of global warming. If you are not part of the consensus and deviate from their belief, you are treated as a criminal. Except that I haven't heard of anyone being jailed. I don't know on what basis a scientist can be jailed?
Sadly this kind of abuse and denial of reality is observed all too frequently.
https://www.hrsa.gov/vaccine-compensa...
The 5,454 claims for harm from vaccines were 1/10,000 of 1.7% -- .000017 -- of the over 3 billion doses of vaccines, and 32% of the claims were dismissed even under the current legal system. (The fraction of claims against vaccines is equivalent to about 550 people out of the entire US population of about 300 million.)
All medical procedures entail some risk, due to either unusual biological reaction or in improper administration. Some problems are inevitable in large numbers of cases. It's not a plot.
We do, however, have a big national problem with the legal shark 'profession' abusing the system for shakedowns. It causes enormous losses from the looting and gives a bad name to the legitimate cases. A portion of $3.9 billion in coerced settlements over vaccines is only a small part of it.