California's new water restrictions send residents fleeing to saner states
Now things begin sto stir as people actually need to be told a few dozen times what their lunatic control freak government is up to. This was last week and they are just starting to get excited....
Here in Vegas, one of the former bastions of independence (I would have thought..), one cannot start a business UNTIL its approved by the city itself. And that approval can only come after 45 days of deliberation and a visit to the city council meeting and getting approval from the sheriff department. In addition the business you are proposing to start needs to be on a list of "approved businesses.
On the water issue here, the water utility is a little smarter, having tiers of water usage per month with rates that quarduple as you get to the highest tier. But its still VERY cheap, and probably lower than the real market value.
All the while California permits illegal immigration of refugees and other people of limited education, making their need for water go up.
Eventually there will be an exodus of residents along with the individual fines for “excessive” water use, and some restrictions regarding fleeing the state. I left some time ago while it was still a decent place to live
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/cal...
Snopes says no, the fines applies to the water suppliers, although how that works I don't know.
Moonbeams announcement clearly says: Establishing an indoor, per person water use goal of 55 gallons per day until 2025, 52.5 gallons from 2025 to 2030 and 50 gallons beginning in 2030.
I had a hard time finding anyone who could clearly show that the law would or would not penalize individuals, I know a couple years ago they did require each well to have a meter on it, as I had personal experience with people who could not believe they imposed such invasion of property.
If water projects were private, none of this would have happened. California's population would never have outgrown the land's ability to support it. But lack of imagination has meant that water was a public utility since ancient Rome with its famous aqueducts, and possibly more ancient than that.
I've looked at Rand's essays. I didn't find the one on the property status of water--unless I missed something.
I can proudly say that, for the first time in my life, I now get my water from a completely private source. I have an Artesian well in my front yard. Not only is this the best water apart from a mountain spring or stream, but it depends solely on local rainfall, which has always been plentiful. I manage the water, and I control its quality. Nobody tells me how much or how little water I must use, because I do not draw from a common source. (And I even added a second source: a rain barrel.)
Nobody thinks in terms of light (that is, electricity), gas or water subject to private delivery and management. We all know that was the rule in Atlantis. (Dick McNamara became the prime LGW distribution provider; John Galt was, of course, the prime electrical generation provider.)
California is only the first polity to pay the price, in the form of a tragedy of the commons, for providing government water with no thought for the future. The Republic of Israel at least have done some planning, but are now about to embark on desalination to supplement their water. Water will be a casus belli soon.
We, the People, should do the same to the feds and their dependent corporate looters.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/3096f7cc...
Load more comments...