Besides bowing to Muslim rulers, King Barry was always a Putin kiss-up, who someone like Putin could only view as pathetically weak.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsFR8...
Putin was more than happy to take Obozo's treasonous grand giveaway of 20 percent of our uranium, though.

Me dino sees your two and raises to three.

100 were murdered by the feds at Waco. Why were they killed? Cui Bono? What justice did those innocent people receive?

Much earlier than that. U.S. Marines were part of the action fighting Boxers in China in the early 1900s. What American interest were we protecting there? Although the Philippines declared their independence from Spain in 1898 (with our help), they remained a U.S. puppet until 1946. Staged a Panama "uprising" against Columbia in the same period, so we could build the Panama Canal. In the 1920s we were engaged in fighting in several Central American countries to "stabilize" the region. We seem to be addicted to the questionable premise that by helping one group in a sovereign country murder their fellow citizens, we're actually acting for noble principles and exporting American freedom.

And we the people stand by idly accepting the murders done by the feds.

"to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it"
...
"Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. "

I think a big problem is that a year later there is still no evidence to confirm Assad was responsible for the first one. Even Trump's National Security Adviser has admitted it. And now again, all we have are "White Hats" (see Muslim Brotherhood) and questionable video. Risking killing anyone, just one person, for what is a clearly politically motivated action is on the edge of being immoral itself.

Obama's "red line" basically told Bashar al-Assad that he had free reign to do what he wishes with chemical weapons. To quote an infamous do-nothing President, "don't tell me words don't matter."

Agreed, which is why I'm not on the Churchill-esque bandwagon yet. Russia is still far too vulnerable with regards to oil to risk a conventional war.