Fraud: Wolff Admits He’s Not Sure His Own Book Is True
It's a short article, but this is the important part the lamestream leaves out.
Reading this causes me to wonder, if most of this is false or uncolaborated then why even write a book in the first place...unless of course, "it's Just Another Distraction".
Now, however, it looks like there could be much more to the story. Michael Wolff, the author of the title that set off the political fireworks, has admitted that he isn’t sure which parts of his own book are true — and that much of it may be exaggerated or blatantly false.
“Michael Wolff […] included a note at the start that casts significant doubt on the reliability of the specifics contained in the rest of its pages,” reported Business Insider reported. “Several of his sources, he says, were definitely lying to him, while some offered accounts that flatly contradicted those of others.”
Incredibly, the author of a book that is being treated as factual by much of the media admitted to “looseness with the truth,” and basically guessing about which accounts were accurate and which were invented out of thin air.
“Many of the accounts of what has happened in the Trump White House are in conflict with one another; many, in Trumpian fashion, are baldly untrue,” Wolff wrote in the book’s prologue.
This is the same info being reported by other news sources as well, even the Washington Post.
I read the authors notes on Amazons "Look Inside" and this last paragraph is there.
Reading this causes me to wonder, if most of this is false or uncolaborated then why even write a book in the first place...unless of course, "it's Just Another Distraction".
Now, however, it looks like there could be much more to the story. Michael Wolff, the author of the title that set off the political fireworks, has admitted that he isn’t sure which parts of his own book are true — and that much of it may be exaggerated or blatantly false.
“Michael Wolff […] included a note at the start that casts significant doubt on the reliability of the specifics contained in the rest of its pages,” reported Business Insider reported. “Several of his sources, he says, were definitely lying to him, while some offered accounts that flatly contradicted those of others.”
Incredibly, the author of a book that is being treated as factual by much of the media admitted to “looseness with the truth,” and basically guessing about which accounts were accurate and which were invented out of thin air.
“Many of the accounts of what has happened in the Trump White House are in conflict with one another; many, in Trumpian fashion, are baldly untrue,” Wolff wrote in the book’s prologue.
This is the same info being reported by other news sources as well, even the Washington Post.
I read the authors notes on Amazons "Look Inside" and this last paragraph is there.
It too, was political because he went against the lamestream.
Gore admits that much of his book is conjecture and theory, but the MSM continues to refer to it as a factual "reference".
With all the litigation that goes on, in this country, why aren't people getting the shirts sued right off their backs for writing this tripe?
Kind of like the kid in school that admitted his story about to be told...was bullshit...and like dummies, we listened anyway...laughing!
I didn't vote for Trump. For all his bluster and appearances on "The Apprentice", Trump is still remarkably surrounded by sycophants (like Bannon). Obama certainly had those, but despite their corruptness they still were loyal and knew who buttered their bread. But the other consideration is the news media bias, which is open, unabashed, and entirely one-sided. They are the ones peddling this book and even referring to it as if it were authoritative (which is just laughable). On that, I have to agree with Trump that this is just more "fake news".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tuwZr...
Does that look and sound like the same person who wrote the drivel entitled, "Fire and Fury"? And, who actually puts down on paper ONE HUNDRED PERCENT of Trump's friends, family and colleagues think he's a nut case? No, this has scam written all over it.
Then add in the fact that the book was dumped by Wikileaks as a .pdf for free on the internet. AND, Trump having his "Fake News Awards" moved from yesterday to the 17th (a day or two AFTER the supposed release of the OIG report)....I gotta think there's nothing legit being reported about this author, Steven Bannon, and this book.
Maybe I'm the crazy one. What do you think? :-)
But it seems to be more about the "Hero" Bannon!
This is a journalistic hit piece - nothing more, nothing less. It's garbage.
Load more comments...