Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by $ winterwind 10 years, 7 months ago
    This is an example of what I was talking about in my "fight the battle for the minds" post earlier today. I tried to reply to it and could only do so through my FarceBook account. hmmph.

    Do you, by any chance, know who chooses textbooks in Dallas?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ johnrobert2 10 years, 7 months ago
      The state textbook commission, and believe me, there have been some battles royal in their sessions.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ winterwind 10 years, 7 months ago
        Well, having a state Textbook Commission at all is just begging for the loudest voices and the biggest wallets to choose the ideology and parents just put up with this junk? No, don't answer, I know the answer already.

        It's a racket - you have to send your child to "school", and the state defines what a school is, and then they give you crummy books you have to use. grrrr.

        Sounds like they need a good old-fashioned hunger strike until-you-give-us honest- textbooks [or copies of the constitution!!]. State Education Nazis hate that sort of thing.

        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 10 years, 7 months ago
    Something should be done about this. The person who bastardized the 2nd amendment in this text book knew what they were doing and should be publicly flogged! Why does anyone think this needs to be done in the first place since there is easy access to the complete document?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ rockymountainpirate 10 years, 7 months ago
    There are many sources for pocket Constitutions. How about giving them as gifts to kids, then sit down and discuss them? Let them see the true language, not the revisionist tripe.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 10 years, 7 months ago
    I don't think this is a sinister as it sounds. The summaries seem reasonable. The Second Amendment is written in confusing language to begin with, so it's hard to summarize without interpreting. The other amendments appear to be similarly abbreviated.

    I do not believe the summary was ideologically motivated.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by LetsShrug 10 years, 7 months ago
      Yet you admit it sounds sinister. Why abbreviate something that's short to begin with? Why remove, "shall not be infringed"...that's a pretty important part, wouldn't you say?
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo