and unfortunately some scientists let either political beliefs interfere or others political beliefs interfere with their studies.

Knowing how dependent we are from petroleum products, any other energy source is a good thing.
I think some people will find this video interesting:
http://www.ted.com/talks/t_boone_pickens...

Unfortunately, scientific debate is not "sexy" enough for the mainstream as:
1. Science moves slowly and intricately.
2. Most scientists are not good communicators.

Agreed. But that exists in the fracking debate already. We interview many scientists in FrackNation, but if you can't wait for our film you should check out Alex Epstein's interviews with several scientists and experts:

http://industrialprogress.net/2012/08/09...

http://industrialprogress.net/2012/07/10...

My jury is still out as to whether fracking = Rearden Life. The dominant mode of testing new technology today, fighting it out in the public square between equal parts ignorant Left and ignorant Right, is unscientific. I don't want to hear "debate" between Limbaugh and his Left counterpart, but between scientists. One of the things an *Objectivist* head of state would do, would be to divorce science from politics.

Can't wait for this movie as well