It’s well and good that the head of the EPA supports rational science, but during the next four years he needs to overturn the agency’s institutional bias against climate change “denial” and implement policy decisions based explicitly on sound science. Not only does the EPA’s official position need to reverse course, the rationale for doing so must be made as clear as possible so the next administration cannot easily return to the previous status quo. This is a golden opportunity, and I hope it won’t be squandered.

And which edge of the sword did you wield with that comment, CG, the dull edge of global warming propagandists who stick to their false narrative regardless of the objective evidence, or the sharp edge of those who seek truth through the rational scientific method?

It's amazing the mental gymnastics people will go through to avoid facts they don't like.