Rengan Rajaratnam cleared, U.S. insider trading streak snapped

Posted by $ MikeMarotta 9 years, 9 months ago to Business
14 comments | Share | Flag

Raj Rajaratnam

Matthew Taylor -- Mr. Taylor, who graduated from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, owned a home in the Hamptons by the time he was 28.
“In short, Mr. Taylor, you were, in the words of Tom Wolfe, ‘a master of the universe,’ ” the judge, William H. Pauley III, said.
The C.F.T.C. accused Mr. Taylor, who traded equity derivatives products in New York, of hiding the $8.3 billion position he had taken in electronic futures contracts tied to the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index. Though his superiors had ordered him to reduce the risk on his trading book, he instead ratcheted up the position. To conceal the size of the position, he entered “multiple false entries” into a Goldman trading system, booking trades that he never actually made.
Goldman fired Mr. Taylor after learning about his cover-up and reported the unauthorized trades to authorities within days. The C.F.T.C. did not bring charges against Mr. Taylor until five years later, during which time he was able to get another job as a trader with Morgan Stanley.
Ex-Goldman Trader Sentenced to 9 Months in Prison
By RACHEL ABRAMS DECEMBER 6, 2013 6:33 PM
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/12/06/e...



Michael S. Steinberg, - December 18, 2013 – “Prosecutors lacked the incriminating wiretaps that underpinned past insider trading cases. The emails pointed to no smoking gun. And the government’s star witness, a felon who testified to avoid prison time, fumbled his way through five days of cross-examination.
And yet a federal jury in Manhattan on Wednesday still convicted Michael S. Steinberg, the highest-ranking employee at SAC Capital Advisors to stand trial for insider trading.”
Former SAC Trader Is Convicted of Insider Trading
By BEN PROTESS, MATTHEW GOLDSTEIN and ALEXANDRA STEVENSON DECEMBER 18, 2013 3:57 PM
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/12/18/e...
SOURCE URL: http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/07/08/us-usa-insidertrading-rajaratnam-idUSKBN0FD1QU20140708


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by bassboat 9 years, 9 months ago
    In my opinion if the government wants to help the small investor then they can start with the firms that took and still take companies to the market via IPO's. If you remember the .com's of the late 90's the companies like Goldman knew that what they were peddling were a piece of crap. Sophisticated investors can look out for themselves and know when there is a rat, Quite frankly we would have a better market if there were no regulators and people had to do their own homework. The crooks would be weeded out and you would be more likely to buy from good firms and not someone that sells stock to their clients like Goldman and the rest will do when push comes to shove. Another wrinkle would be for the guy's at the top to not be able to hide behind a corporation but be personally liable for what his company did as a result of his decisions. Along with this if he were tried he would be judged by his peers who are knowledgable about the subject and not some guy who has no clue on the markets. A free society always works best, keep the government out of business.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 9 years, 9 months ago
      I am not so sure that a risky investment is necessarily ill-informed. Remember Michael Milken. When a company _seems_ to be in trouble, its bond market collapses, often in excess of the actual margins. I understand that many Dot Coms had poor business plans, but that profit is the reward for the investor who makes the right decision. They could use tea leaves (the governmentalist claim) or market insight. Utlimately, profits and losses follow investments. In any case, it is not anyone else's business.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 9 years, 9 months ago
    I am not knowledgeable enough to make an informed comment. However, that's never stopped me in the past. Something smells bad. The lack of evidence and the change of accusation...looks and sounds like a railroad.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 9 years, 9 months ago
      Prosecutors are promoted based on convictions. Often that "promotion" includes running for office. Look at Rudolph Giuliani, the Republican who prosecuted Michael Milken. In a strange - or not so strange - turn of events, the prosecutor who looted Bernard von Nothaus (look up "LIberty Dollars") came FROM defending white collar "criminals" to being a federal prosecutor appointed by President Obama. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anne_Tompki...

      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by Herb7734 9 years, 9 months ago
        Could you clarify the Giuliani - Milken comment? Are you saying that because of the publicity he received by prosecuting Milken, he was promoted to run for mayor of NYC by the powers that be?
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years, 9 months ago
    We have turned a deaf ear to "Wall Street insiders" because we accepted the government's claim that these were "crony capitalists" who deserved to be indicted for going along with a system that we declared immoral. But were they? And if they were, where does the moral guilt lie? With the convicted traders whose philosophy was incomplete or with the Washington Gang that made them scapegoats?

    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by ewv 9 years, 9 months ago
      "Wall Street" IS Washington's scapegoat. Brought to you by the people who think that the methods and goals of private investment are criminal by nature, but those of the IRS and its state clones are not.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ 9 years, 9 months ago
        Right. We have the author's omniscient eye to tell us that Hank Rearden was morally innocent when he hired Wesley Mouch to be his lobbyist. We lack that in these real world cases. The government typically convicts people in the press with great press conferences that make broad claims. That is part of the demoralization of the defendant. We must understand "de-moral-ization" in its several contexts.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by khalling 9 years, 9 months ago
          insider trading laws: government refuses to define what they mean by insider trading. Their excuse is they do not want to lose a case on a technicality. What it really means is that we are a nation of men not laws. It is often politics. Real insider trading should be dealt with contractually and corporate governance rules. Both of which are private, civil. The govt's role is arbiter only. keeping false books is fraud. Here is Roger Donway, Director of the Business Rights Center at Atlas Society on white collar crime http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jro8sG5l5...
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years, 9 months ago
    "A New York jury on Thursday convicted a former portfolio manager for SAC Capital of insider trading in the government's latest victory against the once-mighty hedge fund.
    Matthew Martoma was found guilty of violating US securities laws with trades based on confidential testing data on prospective Alzheimer's medications developed by pharmaceutical firms Elan and Wyeth.
    A pair of doctors testified in the case that they had passed the confidential data Martoma, showing disappointing test results for the drugs.
    SAC subsequently sold virtually all of its $700 million investment exposure to the two companies, according to the government's indictment." -- https://en-maktoob.news.yahoo.com/former...

    These people are being punished for acting on _knowledge_. The socialist theory - actually a radical democratic epistemology - is that no one is allowed to know anything not known to all. Moreover, the essence of financial investment must be only a crap shoot - which is their view of the market. Their legal regime enforces a RANDOM approach to investing, so that no "bet" is operationally superior to any other, like roulette.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years, 9 months ago
    Yet another injustice escaped the radar screens of those who are so loquacious at denouncing President Obama. "Scott Zeringue Convicted of Insider Trading on Acquisition of Shaw by Chicago Bridge and Iron" -- full story here: http://www.thechicagosyndicate.com/2014/...

    A former executive of the Shaw Group has pled guilty to engaging in insider trading. The conviction is the result of an ongoing federal investigation into the use of pre-merger confidential information regarding the 2012 acquisition of Shaw by Chicago Bridge and Iron Company (CB&I).

    SCOTT DAVID ZERINGUE, age 48, of Baton Rouge, Louisiana, pled guilty before Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson to one count of conspiracy to commit securities fraud in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 371. ZERINGUE also agreed to forfeit proceeds derived from the offense.

    Chicago Bridge and Iron - CB&I - is also known as "Cousins, Brothers and In-laws." It would be hard to find a licensed professional engineer in any American state who does not have "insider" knowledge.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years, 9 months ago
    Our problem is the muddied waters of moral certitude. We hate George Soros because he is a progressive globalist. Well, actually, SOME hate him; I do not. But, he, too was convicted in a French court of insider trading. No libertarian, objectivist, or conservative spoke up.

    _Insider Trading Conviction_
    In 1988, Soros was interested in purchasing shares in French companies. The Socialist party had lost its majority of seats in the Assembly, and the new government under Jacques Chirac had instituted an aggressive privatization program. Many people considered shares in the newly privatized companies undervalued. ....
    In 1989, the Commission des Opérations de Bourse (the French stock exchange regulatory authority) conducted an investigation of whether Soros' transaction in Société Générale should be considered insider trading.
    ... Several years later, a Paris-based prosecutor reopened the case against Soros and two other French businessmen, disregarding the COB's findings. This resulted in Soros' 2005 conviction for insider trading by the Court of Appeals (he was the only one of the three to receive a conviction). The French Supreme Court confirmed the conviction on June 14, 2006, but reduced the penalty to €940,000.
    Wikipedia here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Soro...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years, 9 months ago
    Regnan Rajaratnam is the younger brother of Raj Rajaratnman who was sentenced to ELEVEN YEARS in prison for the crime of allegedly knowing something that everyone else in the world did not know.
    "Raj Rajaratnam (Tamil: ராஜ் ராஜரத்தினம்; born June 15, 1957) is a Sri Lankan American former hedge fund manager and billionaire founder of the Galleon Group, a New York-based hedge fund management firm.[3][4] On October 16, 2009, he was arrested by the FBI on allegations of insider trading, which also caused the Galleon Group to close.[5] He stood trial in U.S. v Rajaratnam (09 Cr. 01184) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and on May 11, 2011 was found guilty on all 14 counts of conspiracy and securities fraud.[6][7] On October 13, 2011, Rajaratnam was sentenced to 11 years in prison[8] and fined a criminal and civil penalty of over $150 million combined.[9]
    As of January 14, 2013 Rajaratnam is incarcerated at Federal Medical Center, Devens in Ayer, Massachusetts, an administrative facility housing male offenders requiring specialized or long-term medical or mental health care. Rajaratnam's release date is July 4, 2021." -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raj_Rajarat...

    "The government’s winning streak continued throughout 2013 and 2014 as the Department of Justice secured one victory after another, tallying more than 80 guilty verdicts and pleas as it added wire taps to its crime-fighting arsenal. The bountiful of trophies collected by Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, whose office led the Department of Justice’s crusade, included Steven Cohen’s SAC Capital, which forked over $1.8 billion in penalties and shuttered its doors to outside clients. Compared to the difficulty it had in prosecuting Wall Street for the 2008 financial crisis, these victories indicated that the government could still successfully pursue white collar criminals." -- FORBES here: http://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelbobel...


    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo