12

Obama did us a favor...

Posted by strugatsky 7 years, 4 months ago to Politics
60 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

Is it possible that Obama, inadvertently, did us a favor with his back-stabbing vote against Israel in the UN? Of course, we all know why he did it and what motivated him – his Muslim background and perhaps faith, his hatred for anything civilized, Western and democratic, his personal hatred of Israel and Netanyahu and, in no small measure, a parting "gift" to Trump and to America. In doing so, just as an out of control spoiled teenager, what he did was hurt himself in the long run, but more importantly he has provided Trump with an excuse (and the public opinion to go with it) to withhold funding from the UN, to finally humiliate the UN and the monkey circus that it consists of and to possibly (hopefully) withdraw from the UN altogether. I personally can't think of a single action that the UN has done since the Korean War that was of any benefit whatsoever.

We can hope that the UN will collapse without the US funding and participation, but Obama's antics will have even more benefits – he had literally trust a dagger into the heart of the Democratic Party! There are three pillars to the DP that provide it with philosophical direction – the Progressive Bernie Sanders Left, consisting of adulting useful idiots that forever want free tuition, free education, free healthcare, free housing, free ... The second pillar, fast growing but still vulnerable, is the Muslim component. It cannot be open about its goals or the game's up. The third and perhaps the most powerful pillar consists of American Jews. I am saying "most powerful" because the Sander's Idiots have the majority of the bodies, but no money and no brains, while the Muslim pillar has to hide its true intentions. The American Jews, on the other hand, have always been very vocal about their positions, have provided funding and have control of the media. They are not religious for the most part, but supporting Israel has been part of their fabric. Or, at least believing that they were supporting Israel, since the Democratic Party has generally not been a good friend to Israel at all, but they've always refused to accept the facts. They managed to reconcile a growing Muslim agenda within their party by closing themselves to facts. Likewise, American Jews have had a long love affair with Blacks, refusing to see the one-sidedness of it, for there are very few Blacks in America who do not hate Jews. And now Obama has explicitly shown his hatred for the Jews, for Israel and for Western values and for the 50-year old platform of the Democratic Party.

If this action manages to make a split in the DP, it may prove to be very significant, since a chunk of the media may come with it. I understand that the brainwashing it deep (maybe part of the DNA by now...), but this is the most direct and significant damage to the DP in years. Something to look forward to!


All Comments

  • Posted by walkabout 7 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    My first rendition of the plan was to sell a commensurate area (at commensurate latitude) to Israel to move the country. I figured that would be rejected because it is tough to compete with the land promised by God; then we could offer the land to the Palestinians. I'm pretty sure they would not accept the suggestion/offer. After all (or before all) there is no desire to solve the problem.
    I do like the idea of Baja!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by coaldigger 7 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The last two companies I worked for in my 45 year career were Jewish. One sold the company so he could spend more time studying Objectivism and donating his time and money to the Ayn Rand Institute. Unfortunately, he recently passed away from cancer. The last is as far from a liberal as you can be. Had a suggestion similar to yours, to buy the Baja Peninsula and move Israel there. His reasoning was that it would be very similar, they would only border with the US, which would be good since we are the only country that they have ever gotten along with.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by walkabout 7 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    And that is one of the benefits of the FairTax; it is voluntary. When YOU decide the tax is excessive you can just decline to buy things (that is NEW things, as the FairTax does not apply to used items. If food becomes too expensive you can grow your own, drive a used car (or ride a bicycle so you don't have fuel use taxes either). Hope you are supporting Americans for Fair Taxation (AFFT) and the Article V movemen (COS.org)t. Repealing the 16th is crucial!!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 7 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Without a tele-prompter, he is not capable of saying two coherent sentences. Notice that he has been getting lax in his presentations lately and is sounding more and more coming from a ghetto.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 7 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes !! and I feel like a slave. I resent greatly paying taxes for things i dont want. If Hillary had been elected, I was seriously thinking about just not paying more income taxes, shrinking down my housing expense to reduce property taxes, and seriously slowing down purchases of non essential items to slow down sales tax payments, and just making my car last a LONG time.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by walkabout 7 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Any time one entity has the RIGHT to the value of another (whether that is 100 per cent or a lesser per cent) that is Slavery. If the government, who has the exclusive right to use force to take any and everything you or I have that is slavery just as sure as if "Mazer" owns me and puts me to work in his cotton field. Income Taxation is morally reprehensible!!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by walkabout 7 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Many praise BO for his speechifying ability. Having listened to him on many occasions, I don't see it; never have.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 7 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Of course. Many were surprised when Herr Hitler did not turn out to be a gentleman. But Hitler wrote openly about his agenda; he spoke openly about it, no one was hiding it. Yet, no one was listening. Likewise with Obama. In his book, he openly declared that the "white man" is the problem. I heard his speech at a college in 2007; it was like listening to Lenin, only in English. The information was there, in the open.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 7 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The problem I see with business income taxes is that no one knows how to charge the customers since the tax is on profits which isn't known until the end of the year. So it's really a tax businesses pay for turning a profit. No wonder apple hides its profits overseas only to have 35% stolen from it by USA tax
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by walkabout 7 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I would only note that businesses don't actually "pay" taxes. They only collect taxes. That is why repealing the 16th Amendment and passing the FairTax Act is so important.
    The 13th and 14th Amendments ended legal slavery in the USA; the 16th Amendment reinstated slavery on a much broader population.
    "Progressives" always want to limit people; Conservatives always want to limit government.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 7 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Add obama to the list of top down "leaders". The vote for trump represented a popular revolution. The problem is that half of the country seems to want another top down crooked Hillary type. Trump is not philosophically consistent either so I wonder how much swamp draining he will actually get done. I think he will curtail immigration, reduce taxes on business, fix up foreign relations and get rid of obama's exec orders. I think he will appoint constitutionalist to the Supreme Court. The rest of what you suggest will take fed and state congress approvals- all of whom are alligators in the swamp today. Add an amendment to stop special interests from using government to enrich themselves at the expense of the rest of it- so that the Hillary people can't purchase government favors we have to pay for.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by walkabout 7 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    That is pretty much true of any "top down" leader. Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini, Wilson, FDR, Mugabe, Puttin, etc. etc. As long as no body pushes back they are easy to get along with. Had Federalist types fought FDR the depression would have lasted a few months. it is time to implement policies to return to a Republic. Repeal the 16th and 17th Amendments, pass the FairTax Act, pass a new amendment that makes all laws -- present and future -- null and void after a brief set period of time (maybe 10 years). Take the vote away from kids (allowing anyone in the military to vote -- if they also happen to be 21 they get two votes), impose term limits and cut pay to elected officials to match the median income of their constituents (or some multiple of that). Raise the age requirements of all Constitutional offices by at least 10 years.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 7 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The incident is interesting and even today nothing of value has been declassified. It is unlikely that the Israelis were concerned about a direct transfer of information to Egypt, but knowing how porous the US was (and is) at the highest levels, it is probable that they viewed Liberty as if it was flying a Soviet flag. Precisely at that time the IDF was switching gears to repulse Syria and having its troop movements advertised would not have been a good idea. Still, that does not provide a complete explanation. Requesting the US government to withdraw the ship seems to have been a better choice than trying to sink it, and then failing to sink it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 7 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The movements that propose "returning" lands are not motivated by history or by "fairness" or by "peace" - they are motivated by loathing of civilization itself. They welcome any regression.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by H2ungar123 7 years, 4 months ago
    The biggest favor by far the WH turd can give us is
    his "good-by". Counting the days.....
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 7 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Almost all that belong to the DP have a disconnect with reality, but the delusion of the American Jews is nothing short of amazing. Unwaveringly, they march on to their own destruction. And just as unwaveringly they support policies that have been instrumental in their previous destruction - civilian disarmament, big and all powerful state, the ends justifying the means... This is a separate and a fascinating topic, worthy of Freud himself, for no doubt there will be prescriptions written. In fairness, I should mention that there are notable exceptions to this Mad Jewish Decease - The Second Amendment Foundation and several other groups, but they are a minority.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LibertyBelle 7 years, 4 months ago
    It is too bad that so many Jews have been such
    strong supporters of the Democratic Party. Maybe
    now they will finally wake up? Oyyy!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by IndianaGary 7 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Like giving speeches for $100,000 a pop? I'm sure some stupid, elitist, Democrat will be happy to pay him. After all the have to apologize for all that money they've acquired.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by walkabout 7 years, 4 months ago
    As in so many matters "historical," the left has re-written history. Hitler was not on the right, he was a socialist! (Fascism is a flavor of socialism.) Just as some may became other than Democrats, I think it is unlikely Truman would be a Dem today (as Reagan said, "I didn't leave the Democratic Party, the Democratic Party left me"). Maybe the new sheriff in town (DJT), who has reached out to inner city poor and "persons of color" who have been misused by Democrats for decades -- after being freed from slavery by Republicans -- will reach out to Israel and American Jews and write a true history and a forward looking -- as you say, civilized -- future.
    It is essential DJT continue to tweet and present to the public the truth about various and sundry things -- historical and current -- to educate the American people as to the truth about how the world got to be how it is. BO seems to think if he says it, it is the truth -- as do the holocaust deniers and those who believe there is something called historical Palestine (previous to the Effort in the last century to create some kind of order in the Middle East).
    If it is important to the various Middle Eastern Powers that be that "the Palestinians" have their own state why don't we (the USA) sell them a piece of land at the same relative latitude (It would be in Texas and Texas is big enough not to really miss it (it would only be 2400 square miles) -- of course, as the Israelites have found, we would have to build a wall to keep them in (but that is one of the things DJT is good at). Those same powers could spend the next 10 years of so transporting the "Palestinians" across the Atlantic Ocean.
    As far as the actions BO has taken, when did we start to give back land won fair and square in war -- especially defensive war. While I am not an historian, this idea seems to be quite new (Some here in the USA seem to think we should give much of the West "back" to Mexico. Of course, should Mexico cease to exist and become New Spain Again? Or maybe break up the area and recreate the Aztec Empire or the land of the Pueblo people. Where does it end -- oh, maybe when Homo Sapiens resurrect the Neanderthal and give back much of Euro-Asia.....
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 7 years, 4 months ago
    Truman may have encouraged recognition of Israel, but he failed to get Congress to agree to supply needed weapons to the Jews. That doesn't exactly draw Jewish support, since their democratic state could have been stillborn at the start.

    When Egyptian President Nasser tried to nationalize the Suez canal, the U.S. sided with the USSR in demanding the withdrawal of British, French, and Israeli troops from the canal. Again, not exactly supportive of Israeli goals.

    During the 1967 war waged against Israel by combined Arab forces, the U.S. parked a spy ship, the USS Liberty, in the middle of the conflict without contacting the Israelis. Since the ship wasn't talking to the Israelis, they assumed it was supplying the Egyptians with intelligence, and attacked it. Israel has been demonized by the U.S. for that attack, but it was a stupid, bonehead move on our part.

    President Nixon, who supplied the Israelis with desperately needed munitions during the Yom Kippur conflict in 1973 was the first U.S. leader to stand by Israel in time of conflict.

    During the first Gulf war, we aggressively defended our Muslim allies, and warned the Israelis not to fight back when the Iraqis fired Scud missiles into Israel. We did try to stop the missile bombardment with Patriot ABMs, but those were nothing but a fireworks display, failing to stop even one Scud.

    Out of a delusional idea of evenhandedness, we provide financial support to Muslims like the Palestinians, who won't even accept the right of the Jewish state to exist. Virulent antisemitism that matches the worst of Nazi Germany is spouted at all levels of Muslim society, even here in the U.S., but we lecture the American people that we mustn't practice Islamophobia.

    Anti-Jewish hate crimes here in the U.S. occur at five times the rate of anti-Muslim hate crimes, yet it's the anti-Muslim incidents that get reported. I have wondered in amazement at the unwarranted degree of support for the Democratic party by Jews, and can only attribute it to the same kind of delusion that led Jews in Nazi Germany to deny they, as "good Germans" were in any danger until it was too late.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by evlwhtguy 7 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    It was "PLO gunmen" that fomented the Lebanon civil war. A group like that can be a cancer your country.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo