You're trying to argue from a moral point most people here disagree with. It isn't morally right to force a human to pay for someone else's sustainability. It doesn't matter how well it works or how many people it saves or how much money it saves. It isn't right. If your system is so good why don't people volunteer to be a part of it? Why do you have to force them?
It doesn't be have to be regulated. You have the ability to form a contract with your health provider to retain your privacy. If they don't sign than you don't have to do business with them.
The Court ruled that the Affordable Care Act was actually a new national tax, and on that spurious basis, it was constitutional.
Never mind that the WH lawyers actually based their argument on it not being a tax, and that Obama publicly swore that there wasn't any new taxes in the Bill, that was the go-around that the Court had to conjure up.
yes, the Supreme Court has been ignoring the Constitution lately. what's your point? There is no rule of law abut we're pretending there is when it sides with us?
No need to "come back." Universal health care has been established in enough countries to see that the results are positive. Lower cost & better care. I'm sure Ayn would approve.
Good article, but it didn't address any of what I said.
AARP was Obama's biggest backer for his plan, and participated in the writing of the Bill. AARP stands to make a great deal of money when the insurance market collapses.
If you use them for any truth about ObamaCare, than you might as well just 'tweet' Obama for your answers.
How about you come back and talk about bocare after it's fully implemented. Maybe THEN your kool aid colored glasses will have lost their utopian filters.
Lets says: "....all the smarter ones will bolt the hell out of bo care."
Again, absolutely false. Take a look at what's actually going on. And as you look at consider all the fine doctors who work for the military, Catholic Health Care, and the Shriners. Why are you so insulting to them for not going out and grubbing what they can? Do you think they are inferior doctors?
Rob (see below)
"one inevitably tells me of the doctor he or she knows who ran away from Canada to practice in the United States. Evidently, there’s a general perception that practicing medicine in the United States is much more satisfying than in Canada.
Problem is, it’s just not so. Consider this chart:"
Rand is the US Constitution - in less detail. the most important rights are property and contract. WE want the equality of opportunity, not the equality of results. The latter would be socialism, and not good for anyone, morally, intellectually, philosophically, or economically. If you want to join a union, fine, but Right to Work Laws make sense. Let everyone bargain. Unfortunately, with the rest of the World 'catching up" economically, this does mean you had better have super skills or your wages do fall. There is no solution except get the skills or come up with a new idea for a business, or, leave with lower wages. For many of us, money does not mean everything. For others, striving for wealth is important. Both are just fine. Read the Constitution. Read Barnett's "Restoring the Lost Constitution...". Best, LarryT
Ayn Rand is the US Constitution - and that's just fine. She and the Constitution make it simple: the most important rights are property and contract, and we want equality of opportunity, but could never, ever get equality of results - nor would we want to: where would the incentive be to be entrepreneurial? To be anything? To be everything we can be? Right to Work Laws make sense, because everyone should have the right to join or not join an organization - or take a position. Yes, the 14th Amendment was necessary, but, we have it already. Another great Book: Barnett's 'Restoring the Lost Constitution...". I actually read Rand first, but she talks the basics of the Constitution. Also, get Cato's copy of the Constitution and study the Preface. Ten "reads" and you'll be an expert. Also, know the meaning of a republic versus a democracy. This is very important, also. Best, Larry.
Previous comments... You are currently on page 7.
Thanks for sending up the flare, Rozar!
Never mind that the WH lawyers actually based their argument on it not being a tax, and that Obama publicly swore that there wasn't any new taxes in the Bill, that was the go-around that the Court had to conjure up.
Hardly a red letter day for the SCOTUS....
Your article did NOT address a single of my points.
Post an article that refutes my points, and we can go from there.
The ball is in your court.
the company offers a service that you contract with. I guess, just say no
Rob
Rob
Rob
Rob
Rob
AARP was Obama's biggest backer for his plan, and participated in the writing of the Bill. AARP stands to make a great deal of money when the insurance market collapses.
If you use them for any truth about ObamaCare, than you might as well just 'tweet' Obama for your answers.
Again, absolutely false. Take a look at what's actually going on. And as you look at consider all the fine doctors who work for the military, Catholic Health Care, and the Shriners. Why are you so insulting to them for not going out and grubbing what they can? Do you think they are inferior doctors?
Rob (see below)
"one inevitably tells me of the doctor he or she knows who ran away from Canada to practice in the United States. Evidently, there’s a general perception that practicing medicine in the United States is much more satisfying than in Canada.
Problem is, it’s just not so. Consider this chart:"
And you can find that chart at: http://www.aarp.org/politics-society/gov...
Where do you get all that misinformation from?
Load more comments...