Let me know beforehand if you're ever coming to the Birmingham area.
Last time I was in LA it was during the late 70s to visit a brother who moved to Delaware a couple of years ago.
Doubt I will be in California ever again.
Drove along the Big Sur up from San Diego in 1973. Awesome. Nothing like it in Bama.

Allosaur, I didn't mean that as a dig on you personally, rather my opportunistic rant on a couple of peeves. I'd thought the lead caption was a quote you'd copy-pasted from somewhere else. If you're ever in the LA area stop by and we'll hit a pub where we can booze like gentlemen and lob snarky political comments at each other with proper relish.

I just fixed the title by changing the last word, "So" to "Do." First time I spotted that.
Yeah, I write like an angry old dinosaur.
It's because the 69-year-old angry over what f---heads have done to this country.
Anyway, if you don't like my style, don't read me and have a better day.
Me dino knows I'll never please everyone.

Both the title and lead caption of this thread are so incoherently written that they appear to have been run through some kind of 'net translator from the original Urdu or Senegalese or maybe from some rare dialect from Papua New Guinea. At any rate, such software translations tend to be a little sketchy.

But you lost me at "libtart"[sic] - which I believe is commonly spelled "libtard." Whichever. I think people who want to be taken seriously in online debate at any level need to dispense, once and for all, with the goofball practice of assigning derogatory names for opponents.

Yes, I will cop to having done this on occasion myself in days gone by, but after years of seeing it all over the place and noting how intensely silly some of these things have gotten ("Libtard?" Really?) two simple truisms began to stand out in ever-clearer relief:

- Calling your opponent a derogatory nickname tells readers absolutely nothing except maybe "I don't like this person / idea / party / group."

- Calling your opponent a derogatory nickname also tells readers that you are somewhat juvenile, at least in your style. Not an enhancement of your position, that.

A separate issue is that of the confiscation of the term "liberal" in the first place. It should denote "advocate of liberty," not "advocate of the precise, polar opposite of liberty on every issue." So why are we granting to... people we ought to be calling "collectivists" or "statists" or less precisely, "leftists," a compliment they absolutely do not deserve? Even "Leftard" would be an improvement - on intellectual precision if not on style.

As for a Clinton apparatchik wishing out loud that the table might be further slanted away from Democrat B to the direction of his particular favorite, Democrat A, should come as no surprise.

I will be voting for neither in any case. The only true choice on November 8 is:
Bring a pen.
.

Do believe you got Bozo, another actual clown, mixed up with Clarabell.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4aiZt...

Me dino actually watched The Howdy Doody Show as as a little hatchling.
Can tell the Peanut Gallery changed after I outgrew Howdy. It was pure kids. Now I see parents.

rather have Howdy Doody? . I would! -- j
.

He needs to.
I'd rather have Bozo the Clown president over the bribed bimbo.

DT sent out a survey about "debate" 2 -- I said,
""no matter the question, pivot to the issues!" -- j
.

It's the second of three times I used that with the last 16 hours.
Or was it four times? Aw, who cares?

Good One!! -- j
.

It may have well looked like~
http://patriotupdate.com/holt-lary-tr...
~this.

It's called political prostitution as well as tinhorn bribe whoring. .

LOL! I did not notice that....

and, with 2 against 1, the "debate" looked strange. -- j
.

The contributors to Hillary and the Clinton fundation have already PAID. Now Hillary has to PLAY

I think a President Trump will better look out for the interests of We The People than the bought and paid for sick evil hag.
Me old dino would be certain to be making fun of Big Chief Heaps Foot In Mouth from time to time, but you know whose interests the best president money can bribe via the Clinton Foundation will be looking out for.
That's something Bad Hair Day should harp on during the next two debates.

Hillary's contributors have prepaid; now she is obligated to play.

This just came into old dino's tired mind.
Bad Hair: Why are you a liar?
Evil Hag: I am not a liar.
Bad Hair: You just told another lie, and it looks like you're too stupid to answer the clear question of WHY you are a liar.

No. The way to beat Hillary is the "Captain Queeg" method -- get her to totally lose her cool in front of live cameras, 10 days before election day. We can do this.

Trump is cronyism personified. But he's been doing the buying rather than the selling up to now.

Well, you do "hoe" with some southern accent, maybe Cajun, but I dug "how" freedom ends.

Yep, only two face-to face opportunities left.

Some sheeple give "intellectual elites" reason to be so full of themselves.
You have caused me to remember "the pony-tailed guy" Rush Limbaugh used to make fun of.
Right after Bill Clinton was first elected he and Shillary were standing side-by-side grinning when some guy with a ponytail asked "How are you going to take care of us?"
Can't recall Slick Wille's response and me dino just gave up trying to find it.

I am not sure I got it right, but I agree, I thought it was exactly right.

He's still got two debates to get those shots in. Make the strongest accusations in the last debate so that people with short retention spans can remember them before voting.