In Honor of USPTO Stupidity

Posted by $ KahnQuest 9 years, 11 months ago to Books
29 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

Vanity Plate Tale #12: XPLTIV

Mark’s eyes constantly shifted, searching the area around the bus stop. He trembled slightly as he practiced his lines under his breath. “Sirs and Madams, pardon my most inopportune intrusion upon this auspicious meeting. I seek only the approval…”

A buzz sounded, and Mark jumped. He glanced to his right and saw a speaker next to the bench. A computerized voice spoke. “Word not allowed. First warning, Citizen Mark.”

“Pardon?”

“Word ‘pardon’ is still allowed. Word ‘the’ is now trademarked. Be advised, penalty for use of word is five hundred euro.”

Mark’s head spun as he tried to accommodate yet another word trademarked for private use by some troll. How the hell was he supposed to talk at work without the word “the?” The injustice of it all angered him, and his trembling increased. He tried valiantly to keep his mind from spinning out of control.

“Please acknowledge, Citizen Mark.” The computerized voice pushed Mark over an invisible line, and his lips moved before his mind could rein them in.

“Fuck!” he yelled, and kicked the speaker. The grate guarding it bent, but didn’t break.

“Word not allowed. Penalty for use is five hundred euro.”

© 2013 Jonathan Kahn


All Comments

  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 9 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I was just providing the actual quote from the movie, not correcting you.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Kittyhawk 9 years, 11 months ago
    I've always been in favor of IP protection, but I have heard some shady things about the way it actually operates (i.e. the cronyism that infects all of government). Then there's stories like Amazon receiving a recent patent for "photography against a white background." https://www.techdirt.com/articles/201405...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 9 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Oh, yeah, I'd forgotten about Disney.

    Horrific abuse of Copyright law.
    They should not be able to keep the creations of Walt Disney's mind copyrighted in perpetuity.

    Think about D'Anconia's money speech and the bit about the worthless heir...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 9 years, 11 months ago
    Disney is very strong about anyone using the likeness, or names of their creations. Once as a parody I wrote a "what-if" piece about Disney World trying to copyright the word "World" in a humor mag.Got a call from one of their lawyers.
    I pointed out that it was satire and therefore Disney would look like a flock of donkeys if they sued. Never heard from them again.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 9 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I'm no trademark lawyer, but I'm certain that they
    all can register the images associated with their
    names -- like a business' logo (e.g. Coca-Cola).
    the circled R, or the old reg-us-pat-off, was
    associated with the image, which contains the
    name. -- j

    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 9 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    That's kind of the point. It is satire. It doesn't have to follow legal definitions to make its point.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Ah yes, Disney. The folks that profit from retelling ancient German fairy tales but are quick to sue anyone else who tries the same. Are they going to sue us for talking smack? ;)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    No worries! I appreciate being made to think.

    I have a follow-up question. Considering the originality rule, does it mean that perhaps no major-league team should have trademark protection? It seems to me that none of the teams have original names (e.g. Cowboys, Yankees, Nets). Genuine question, since I'm no expert.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by SolitudeIsBliss 9 years, 11 months ago
    Demolition Man. John Spartan, you are fined 1 credit for violating the Verbal Morality law
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 9 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The world of lawmakers is tumbling down the road to complete irrationality. Who knows how far the insanity of political correctness will lead us in the future if present trends continue? Just in my lifetime things that I could not imagining happening due to their sheer stupidity, have happened.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by khalling 9 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    no. I over-reacted because of this recent SCOTUS decision and it's too close to home. I apologized to kahn above
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 9 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    "if you feel you have the right to use force against me, then show it for what it is; bring guns."
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Okay, just making sure. I'm very much on your side when it comes to IP protection. The tales don't reflect reality.

    Cheers! :)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by flanap 9 years, 11 months ago
    I think I remember a line recently in a movie that really boiled it down, "if you want my metal...bring guns!"
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by khalling 9 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    "Mark’s head spun as he tried to accommodate yet another word trademarked for private use by some troll. How the hell was he supposed to talk at work without the word “the?”"
    this is not how the trademark process works. This assumes no originality. Shakespeare uses the word "the" in every sonnet, play he wrote. no originality? Yes, the trademark revocation of Redskins was politically motivated and shows the crony relationship of govt and the private sector. I read your tale as an absurd take on what can be trademarked and how individuals and companies are kept from doing business and living without fear of violation. Trademarks are specific to not only their industry but sub classifications. for instance-draw an apple, eat an apple, call your daycare Apple Daycare. Do not make computers and call them Apples.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Lucky 9 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes. Absurd but prophetic.
    Has been tried-on by the Russian mafia and by a well known US software buyer. Awaits the next profitable alliance between statists and crony capitalists.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    How so? The content of the tale was meant to be absurd. Do you actually agree that the Redskins should be robbed of trademark protection?
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo