Gary Johnson Loses It! Goes Full PC Over Term ‘Illegal Immigrant’ [VIDEO]

Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 7 years, 8 months ago to Politics
93 comments | Share | Flag

Gary Johnson Loses It! Goes Full PC Over Term ‘Illegal Immigrant’ [VIDEO]
An interview with guy Benson of Townhall:
Wow, Johnson really loses it... no matter how one feels about the rest of his platform, or illegal immigration, or "undocumented immigrants" I would say to him, No; I would not do the same thing. Right or wrong, I would respect the sovereignty and rule of law of the nation I wish to enter. I would enter legally, consider another nation, stay where I am and try to change things in my native land, or start my own business. I wouldn't want to be arrested or considered to be a scofflaw by the native citizens. When in Rome...
A second link: http://www.infowars.com/watch-gary-jo...

All Comments

  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Three left wing sources. Figures He only needs 15% or even left from that group and some of the of the others. lttle bit here little bit there and a huge chunk of homies as opposed to nothing here nothing there not a damn thing anywhere OR Please Help ME I'm falling.... .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Are you Are you really sure Cousin Vinnie sez. He has enough suipport from that group that have votes as opposed to Hillary's that may have votes.

    You don't need 100% you don't need 70% you only need fifty percent plus one. That's what the 3.4 percent mariin is all about. It's not what cherry picking is about. That just tells you where NOT to spend your time and money.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    That's what I thought to and then one of the other posters asked me to go look again. i did and becasme a fan of the platform minus a couple of inconsequentials. That got me looking at Johnson and Weld all over again. It also lined uip with one of his speeches or interviews. My first thought was go back and look at that new platform. Who knows it looked mighty good and mighty empty. Now that is my own opinion. But coupled with the lack of facts on another quest for objectivity it was enough for me. I still prefer None Of The Above. Probably so does the entire nation. But I can't torpedo the Republic for which I stood in uniform for 24 years. based on personal opinion.

    the only true test was lesser of two evils. That would be Clinton and Klein. I yelled about damn political insiders along with others. So I can't torpedo someone for being what I asked for. I listened to the media and that really convinced me. Whatever they are for I'm against.

    Sorry Hillary ha ha three strikes your out.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 7 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I agree complete with what you say above.

    The desire for a "comprehensive solution" is based on our unofficial policy of looking the other way. You're saying let's 1) enforce the law and 2) separately decide what we want the law to be. The trouble is 1 doesn't sound good to people who want more immigration. #2 doesn't sound good to people who want less immigration. So we stick with the bad policy of looking the other way with 15 million people living and operating illegally here.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by peterchunt 7 years, 8 months ago
    Will, we really know who has bad temperament. And I always thought illegal meant illegal. Bad me!!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes and then when Arizona asked the feds to send in as sistance to control that very large super highway from the border knifing due north between Tucson and Phoenix Obama refused but wanted local and state police to do the job. They refused as of now that national park is effectively Mexican territory.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by jsw225 7 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Don't confuse what the Government actually does with what they are allowed to do. Two entirely separate things.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ WilliamShipley 7 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I think the "comprehensive solution" is a false answer which people believe means legalize the ones who are here but not fix the underlying problem. This happened during Reagan.

    There are separate problems which can be solved individually:

    1. Enforce the border. You can do that as a single issue, unconnected with the existing inhabitants. Do that.

    2. Improve immigration law. It's really hard to legally immigrate. Make it easier. Of course this will mean more highly skilled immigrants will come who will challenge middle class jobs instead of just low skilled jobs. So be it. This could be done as a separate issue. Do it.

    Once these two things have been done and there is no longer the threat of gangs and others freely crossing and people have an easier way to come legally, then it will be a lot easier to get a consensus on the existing inhabitants. Don't try for a comprehensive solution. Break it down and solve it one step at a time.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Chose is past tense. That makes it a valid comment but then have should have been had which is what happened. We have been had.

    The choice is Socialist Autocracy or Constitutional Republic. I chose and still choose the latter.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    No you make the rules for your house in compliance with the laws established by the government who supposedly work for the citizens who own the country and you are completely liable
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Bethesda-gal 7 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I didn't call it inconsistent. I just would never support open borders, irrespective of LPs many other positions that I do agree with. However Weld's gun control position I do not support either.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by bittersweet 7 years, 8 months ago
    Just as Galt only allowed people to join his society who agreed with his moral and economic philosophies, we must do the same in order to save our dwindling capitalistic society. The only way to do that is to regulate immigration.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    A current citizen and you don't know who decides?

    All right! You are in the majority already. I'd give iyou a point if I could. Heres ersatz version. +
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Unless you are the US Latino that didn't get that job so he could feed his family. I'm quite sure he or she would consider your comment in the same light.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 8 months ago
    RCP Average 8/22 - 9/2 -- -- 46.0 42.1 Clinton +3.9 Someone's sllippage is showing...

    General Election: Trump vs. Clinton
    LA Times/USC
    Clinton42
    Trump45
    Trump +3

    General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein
    IBD/TIPP
    Clinton39
    Trump39
    Johnson12
    Stein3
    Tie

    General Election: Trump vs. Clinton
    IBD/TIPP
    Clinton44
    Trump43
    Clinton +1

    Iowa: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein
    Emerson
    Trump44
    Clinton39
    Trump +5


    For a complete breakdown RealClear.com or Pew.com No Cherry picking and most all the polls included. Last week nary a one showed Trump ahead now 19 of them do exactly that. What I don't know is which polls are open to anyone and which are restricted to just registered voters.

    Kinda makes you wish those Latino Supporters could vote doesn't it H illary
    Reply | Permalink  
  • -1
    Posted by CircuitGuy 7 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I agree with every word, but what do we do with the 15 million people who are here illegally while we looked the other way? Trying to bring them to justice, IMHO, is like trying to catch people who for the past decade have been driving 5 over every single day. It was gov't's fault IMHO for looking the other way.. We need never to look the other way again, and we need some system of "amnesty" or whatever we call it to deal with these people who've been living here illegally as a underclass.

    Maybe the first step is to start enforcing the laws. At the same time we should have a debate or whatever it takes to answer your question, which I would phrase as "can we benefit from everyone who wants to come and help people for money in the US?"
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Send me your address in the private messaging I'll get it to the right people. They'll show up in three to six months.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Another category that gets lumped into the swirl are are not illegals but refugees. The groups in Syria who were dodging the genocidests and the ones Kerry ruled were refugee status. Prior to that about 25 people of four or five groups were allowed in so you might want to ask Mr. Kerry how many have been extracted so far? They have a legitimate reason. So do most of the desert crossers but they face a different kind of persecution. Pasports at $3,000 to $7,000 peso one for each member of the family. That's six to fourteen weeks of income. But if they can get Mexico to lower that one cost it would help.

    Second thing is requirements to enter demand some skills. Demonstrated grasp of the language when they go to the consulate is one. Bringing a family from Chiapis to Nogales or even the much closer Brownsville is a huge undertaking. So some changes in the policies might help. That takes deal making if you are talking Mexico or Iran. Never the less when they cross illegally they have committed a criminal act and they know it. Their own government provides a comic strip type guide on the subject.

    So what it boils down to is all these Hollywood Liberals have purchased a passport set for any of the families down here. Put your money where your mouth is and not in Clintons piggy bank. And don't enable those who encourage law breaking. Although working to change those laws might help. Legally not by the whim of a dictator.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo