15

The Bizarre Media Blackout Of Hacked George Soros Documents

Posted by $ nickursis 7 years, 9 months ago to Government
82 comments | Share | Flag

Poster boy for the Beast. And one of her money boys. And a sign of the future. We are in deep doo...


All Comments

  • Posted by $ 7 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    If that is indeed so, I would say that if the mainstream media has not dug into that and blatantly asked "why" so that that fact is widely known, that there is some form of collusion between them all, that is something that the Libertarians should latch onto.Why would such a "patriot" have the need to form their "Presidential" foundation in another country? To cover the crap of course.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by galentol 7 years, 9 months ago
    Ellsworth Toohey a weak character? It doesn't take much to influence weak people. Look what's coming out of the colleges today and look who's teaching them a lot of EMT rot.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Dobrien 7 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I have to say , the fix is in. "No reasonable prosecutors would........" Hard to believe these are the candidates after the last 8 destructive years. In the word of OldUglyCarl kakistocrats.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 7 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    No difference in parties. All rights will be sacrificed evidenced by the past 30 years regardless of who is allegedly "in power." Nothing but lip service to rights by all statist pols in order to get elected.
    Dol not give consent to these serpents. That was tried and failed to serve the people in every election since the 60s. No more.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKgPY...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ProfChuck 7 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Remember, the real goal of politics is the acquisition and maintenance of power. The only real differences between the parties are who do you have to destroy and which rights do you sacrifice.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 7 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Same old GOP excuse. Pay no attention to the men behind the curtain, just be nice little sheep and be afraid of the one we say is even more dangerous than we are.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Bingo. Right on Prof! The dilemma I hear loud and often. Yet mention an alternate and they look at you in horror....
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    And thus an example of hoe fragile the financial system is, and the manipulation that is possible. So, if the monetary system can be so, what is to say the politics can't? So is all the huff and puff we see from the 2 crap candidates more manipulation?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Freedom, that may be true, it is just you have to factor in the fact that a large majority of the sheeple will never abandon "The Party". They will vote for the criminal or the RINO because they refuse to have to look at the reality of the situation, preferring their fantasy and sloganeering. Makes for a crappy situation all around.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Rolf, I agree with your view, having lived overseas, and seen some of the way the Swedes and English vote and think, we are not too far off the norm. The political machines have gone to work in all the countries, and that was one point AR was trying to make, the value of liberty and freedom has been manipulated and twisted in most countries in one way or another and the quality of leadership reflects that manipulation.The crap candidates are every where's, not just here. Freedoms point of Libertarians is valid, in that it is something people have got to consider, since the 2 crap parties are no longer viable. It is just a large majority refuse to give up on "The Party".
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Rolf, you do see that things are in dire straights. Good for you, as there is a very small percent that recognize that and also can figure out it is not just because the Dems or Reps are in office, as the 2 parties have specifically driven the herd into that mentality. The debate here is the same one you will see amongst most people who do not want to have to buy into the big 2, who have become so arrogant and secure in their power, they throw 2 bags of trash into the fray and tell us to "choose". There was no viable republican I could see in the primaries, and the Dems had nothing that was allowed. So we have this dilemma.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Agreed just wanted to drop off as point on that position and the point on the Democrats is well put. Klein will suck more support. The polls if iyou do the averages not the cherry picked best of the day are not as bad as they are made out to be by the lame streamers. The radical reasoners aside have their own little narrow agenda and they are so myopic and narrow minded thay can't see the woods for the trees but hey are a minority with a my way or the highway mentality. One track amateurs. Trump has two things going for him. The words getting out don't judge an outsider by insider rules using their foolish useless definitions and rhetoric. Just focus on the fact that Hillary is an accomplished chronic liar and no matter what she says it is meaningless. But what she has demonstrated so far is as you say she has to go. Nice call on the three speeches. They still sound like an outsider and the left can't handle being ignrored or ditching what they proclaim. So the responses are typically 'playing stupid.'
    That will keep the humanoid in line. Less the Kliein subtraction. She's runing for the future seeing the same thing in the Socialist party as we see in the Republicans. There day is done.

    The other response comes later but there is a lot of votes out there if he or even if Johnson wants to mine them .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Never know there is still the lure of a Coalition deal which to be blunt would include Johnson and not Weld though something could be found. With some proper advertising there is the magic of getting someone in the Lib Party into a position of national exposure as a Cabinet Secretary I would think Interior. Get a couple of main points included in the sacred ground and be another 'adviser' to the outsider. Nowhere to go but up from this point. Coaliton you see is not a party but a group of parties with like beliefs on the important issues. Five percent to offer with a way of getting more..and then there is that 46% of the eligible voters pool. Hillary having nothing to counter cause Klein sucked them up. and if you look at the average of the polls not the selected best of the day she is not that far ahead.

    Worth a try and the Debate issue could well be the introduction. "Since Hillary is denying the other two candidates the right to debate I've decided to include at least the Libertarian Candidate and besides we agree on a lot of major points and can set the minor one's aside." Since the Republicans heretofore have abandoned half the electorate ....I shall incude them.?"

    Turn it in maybe you'll make history and four years later .... Johnson is a household name.

    That is how much be advised of the real platform not the one I formerly read meant it's quite good. Johnson is gets pulled away from the left And it gets you well over 15% for the next go round on your own. Most of all iit cuts the bitches throat.

    You know think objectively use any tool you can to get where you need to be. and at worst create a rallying point with some legs and purpose.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by jabuttrick 7 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    MA: I'm glad you had a chance to review the Platform and have reconsidered your claim about it. As to the debates, the 15% threshold seems out of reach. Although a handful of states currently have Johnson above that level (most significantly Colorado) it is only the national polls that count and Johnson is around 10% there. With only about 3 weeks left until the debaters are chosen, it seems highly unlikely that the 15% mark will be surpassed. The only hope would be if Trump demands that Johnson and Klein be included or he will boycott. That would throw the whole process into turmoil and the result is unpredictable. It would put Clinton in a predicament. But I doubt that will happen. Given the hundreds of millions still to be spent by Socialist Hillary and Benito Trump and the power of the "wasted vote" mantra, I still think it will be a minor miracle for Johnson to get 5% and Klein 2% on election day.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 7 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    No reason for me to respond to your straw man comments.
    (Apologies if my earlier posts gave you reason to feel the same way.)
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo