FBI doesn't recommend indictment = Hillary skates

Posted by johnpe1 7 years, 10 months ago to Government
21 comments | Share | Flag

these people are "confusing" the laws;;; intent is NOT
required. . I know from my classification history. -- j
.


All Comments

  • Posted by 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    she embarrassed us with her reset button crap and
    lies about landing among gunfire ... and intent isn't
    necessary, though it is obvious. . and we probably
    owe snakes an apology. -- j
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by jpellone 7 years, 10 months ago
    I had an Ensign get kicked out of the Navy for leaving the vault unlocked for 2 minutes while he walked into the connecting space. We were at sea at the time.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 7 years, 10 months ago
    The only "intent" involved is Comey's intent to cover his ass. We are told what an honorable, fair man the head of the FBI IS only to see him fall right into the same pattern of deceit as all the rest. The glowing descriptions of the man now seem like a set-up so that no one will take issue with his decision. Screw that! The man is a shill for the elites, because even a deranged nutcase can tell that there are prosecutable offenses in what Mrs. Clinton did.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by dwlievert 7 years, 10 months ago
    Comey to Hilda: "What difference does it make?"

    Hilda in reply: "Exactly! You're the only one who "understands".................
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by wiggys 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Clinton knew at the time she did what ever she would not be held accountable so she did what ever she wanted!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 7 years, 10 months ago
    The real issue with Hillary wasnt indictment. It was that she wants to do things in secret and hide it from public view- just like her crooked husband did with monica lewinsky and many others.

    I thought Clinton should have been impeached not for having sex on the side, but for actually thinking he could do it and the woman would keep quiet about what happened (she did for about an hour....). Terrible judgment.

    With Hillary, she is just a snake in the grass. She wanted to make sure she could delete anything that came up later that could be used against her. She was a terrible Secretary of State, who did nothing at all, and offers nothing good for us as president.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 7 years, 10 months ago
    This nation has now been officially co-opted by Wesley Mouch. It's downfall will come quickly.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 10 months ago
    Instead they will go after a Navy Reservist using the exact reverse of their argument tht excused Hillary.

    But....they did not comment on the other ongoinig investigations including the multi million dollar foreign donations to the Clinton Foundation.

    Just who was Hillary working for when she a. ignored repeated warnings about her private email system as a security problem and why...in terms of dollars.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ewv 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The hacks are pros at creating confusion. These 'pros' are confused all right, but not about what they are deliberately doing in this scandal.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ewv 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Comey is a political appointee who was corrupted by the administration with or without the direct intervention of the Clintons. It's all the same mafia -- "turtles all the way down". The law is quite obvious to them, too; the "confusion" is deliberate, hoping that a large segment of the public is confused enough to think the hacks are only confused.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    you couldn't tell that I was speaking sarcastically?
    I was the classification officer for a major manhattan
    project site and the law is quite obvious to me. . Comey
    was corrupted by the Clintons and it just goes to show
    us how power corrupts. -- j
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 7 years, 10 months ago
    billy bob asked lynch...what the definition of "Is" is...and her humanoid brain repeated an error message...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ewv 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    And yet we are not surprised. That's how far the corruption has gone.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ewv 7 years, 10 months ago
    Clinton knowingly violated several Federal laws breaching security and the FBI admits it. It was not "confused" about the law, which is as johnpe said it is. Those of us who have had top level security clearances know that immediately, but such a background is not required to understand the law.

    The FBI "recommendation" to the Justice Dept. said that criminal indictment is not "appropriate", and everyone knows what that means: "politically appropriate" on behalf of certain political interests.

    The FBI director, a political appointee, had to be the one to do it to pretend to be "professional" after AG Lynch had to say she would follow the 'professionals'" recommendation following her embarrassingly open meeting with Bill Clinton. Of course that was a 'social meeting', these people have been in power so long they don't know or care about the difference between their own power and their routine socializing among themselves. No wonder they thought nothing of it at the time and now laugh it off when everyone else understands the obvious.

    The posturing is now that we are expected to believe that the FBI "recommendation" not to pursue criminal charges wasn't a political decision. The corruption is increasingly cynically open. Who can take the law seriously anymore as anything other than political use of power for political purpose to keep the people in line, mixed in with prosecution of some actual crimes to give an appearance of legitimacy. "Respect for the law" now means a demand for respect for statism.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo