Are Changes Coming For Rifle And Shotgun Purchases?

Posted by $ Olduglycarl 7 years, 10 months ago to Legislation
81 comments | Share | Flag

Ok...what would the "objectivist" say...

I say that any individual that has consistently exhibited poor or criminal behavior, is on psychotropic drugs (under the care of a physiologist) or comes from or associates with pagan barbaric religious groups-(muslims) should not have guns.

But...to give the AMA any of this power or rely upon their say so...NO! after all, these are the creatures that have brought you the "Sickness Symptom Careless System".


All Comments

  • Posted by $ 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I have a 20 year old Weber...still goin strong...roast half a cow in no time flat!
    You might have to roast over a bon fire...beware of the carbon police though...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I'm trying to fathom what difference in anything that would make ...really. The sigtht of either one of them all over the news and TV on a daily basis is enough to make anyone turn it off for four years.

    I would have to paint over the left side of the screen.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Animal 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    What would I do about what? The proposed gun control measures in Congress and the several states? I would oppose them. What would I propose in their place? Nothing.

    It's that simple.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Then why was Rand Paul and others fighting it so hard? And why did it rate an announcement New "Years Eve. on public channels? Let's see the excuse this time is.."it's only technical language and it will never happen here." The right to suspend at any given moment does not mean it will be used instantly or constantly. Quibbling does not make it untrue nor does parsing just as parsing did not make Clinton's balanced budget with a surplus the truth.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 7 years, 10 months ago
    the problem is this::: Who Says Who Gets Guns?
    the first "who" is fascist or professional -- or both. -- j
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I'm disappointed. I guess I'll just go roast me a bull. You know anyone with a grill? A really, really big one?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes...it all comes down to conscience and consciousness...those that have and those that have not...there is no moral equivalent. (an article I just posted)

    If you can demonstrate that Canadians are not consciously aware and never will be...then you may have one as your pet. I'm laughing but I bet they won't be...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    My ultimate point here is that our courts and people in the business of making these decisions are hamstrung by the lack of reason and anyone that does have reason is thought of as a monster.

    Just posted a piece on moral equivalence...it's highly relative to this discussion.

    No matter the guidelines in time such as these something always presents a problem whether it be principle or protection and how one arrives at the answer...I've come to the concussion...there is no answer that solves the problem in the paradigm.
    Woopie...we all might die... unjustly
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    It takes a man to recognize nature. I consider my dog to be intelligent. But she doesn't grasp anything that she must deal with. Hot, cold, light, dark are all the same to her. Out of her control. Nothing in nature from quantum physics to the sunrise means anything at all unless there is conscious reason to observe and deal with it.

    Plus, I don't see why I can't have my own Canadian.
    Also, most men I know get their hair trimmed around their temples where it is expressly forbidden. Can you suggest the best way to kill them?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ sjatkins 7 years, 10 months ago
    What is merely "poor" behavior? On what objective scale? What kind of "criminal" when there are 4000 felonies on the law books and over 400,000 regulations with the full power of law?

    Be very careful about taking away inalienable rights.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Animal 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    No, civil rights have not been suspended. Don't be ridiculous. Infringed, yes, at times ignored, yes, but not suspended.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    None there is no due process not any other civil rights since our current President suspended civil rights in general and due process in particular. And that's the answer to your question. Were you asleep when that happened too?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Didn't the forefathers try to align their thinking with the laws a of nature...take my stuff and I'll kick you butt...so why would you take my stuff and risk it...maybe they were just stupid. I don't see that as a man made law...it's a response to an observation of nature.
    That is not to say that there should not be any rules...we do need to drive together in opposing directions on opposite sides of the road if you want to live and get where your going. Even nature and the physical laws are constructed that way. Just a couple rules to make sure it all runs smoothly and that doesn't mean we need a rule for everything either, unless no one has common sense...do what ever you will and chaos is the result...it 's your choice. Live or Die...to be or not to be.

    Laughing...With out a mind or at least a blooming connection to one does not qualify a message from beyond whether that be the ether or a pagan god...clearly the laws you state came from a demented pagan, barbaric brain...let them eat bacon...they may get sick but I doubt they'll burn in hell because of it...that silly stuff cracks me up.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    What other laws are there, but man made ones?
    A direct line from God? Here are just a few.
    I can possess slaves as long as they come from neighboring nations.
    (I prefer the Canadian type)
    I can sell my daughter into slavery.
    I'm not allowed in the presence of menstruating women.
    (I already told you about the bull burning)
    Touching the skin of a dead pig is an abomination, which screws up my football playing.
    Must I go on?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Due process will not solve the problem cause no one can honestly, reasonably process what is due...the system is ignorant and corrupt.

    Everything I've written defines the problem and expressed the difficulties of coming to a solution. Due process is not a solution, it's an ideal...and a good one, I agree, but it won't solve the problem of being confronted with creatures that have no principles.
    So what's your solution, what will you do when you come face to face with it, because it's real and most likely it will at one time or another knock upon our door. I don't have the perfect answer and I can see that Objectivism does not either. No amount of logic or reason will help... We have no Gulch to run to.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Flootus5 7 years, 10 months ago
    When I hear the discussion framed using the words "gun violence", I know that it is already rigged against us. I have never seen a gun shoot another gun.

    The same applies to "assault weapon". They are disingenuously confusing the difference between object and the motive. To illustrate the absurd here, someone should report on a case where an intruder was shot by an AR-15 Home Defense rifle who was wielding an assault baseball bat.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I had my biggest blast behind a M60 machine gun.
    A cart was the target. All I had to do was aim with the tracers to keep the recoiling bursts on target.
    This was at Camp Lejeune,
    It was a heck of a lot more fun than Parris Island for this draftee.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Animal 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    You still haven't answered my original question.

    What
    About
    Due
    Process?

    You describe above the tactics the political Left are using to try to reduce or eliminate fundamental liberties. Are you suggesting we go along with them in the name of expediency? Are you suggesting we fall into the trap of having to "do something" in response to the shouting of hysterics?

    In reviewing the thread, you really aren't addressing anything I write; you're just going off on a new tangent with each reply. I'll give you the last word.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Did the same in Fort Carson...it was literally a BLAST...the tank survived but not completely unscathed.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Because the problem seems to be escalating...escalation is the plan of these mice to rid the earth of men. Albert Pike planned it all out...just from a dim memory of it, it would seem the worlds kakistocracies are following that plan...take down western value creating societies, create 3 world wars and that would lead to One World Communistic Government. islam was a suggestion to accomplish that plan...they too will be destroyed after mission completed...same ole crap for the past 8000 years.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo