Senate approves equal rights for women...and responsibilities.

Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 11 months ago to Government
39 comments | Share | Flag

As I recall Hillary was against equal rights for women while her husband was a strong supporter of equal frights.

Well ladies you are now close to being first class citizens a well deserved promotion if NOW doesn't screw it up for you again.

College Money? Government Job Sign right here! Congratulations you went from draftee to volunteer when needed status. And notice no limitations any and all jobs are open to you... depending on where assigned you might well get to drive a tank in combat.

Regular Army I was and still am against the draft. It's the sign of a despotic government living in fear to have such a tool on hand. Draftees were more trouble than they were worth to be honest though some turned out first rate.

So...do you think Humpty and Dumpty either one will turn down the offer?

Hillary being anti women will argue against it of course. She wants them safe for Bill's staff.

Trump.. who knows.

But remember it's the fascist socialist left that just past this measure. Let's find out how many Rinos and how many of the 15 that voted against suspending civil rights are still on which side.


All Comments

  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I know; There are times in discussions when fne points are reached. Some can be left for further discussion some need one more try when you sense common ground is only one step away. We both made that step simultaneously.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Already did that I'm talking 2016. So why did the left abandon democratic principles such as representative democracy which was their version of representative republic. Had it served it's otherwise useless purpose and time to change definitions again. Note this happened at the same time the Democrats declared them selves Socialists. Would not really care everyone knows they are left wing socialist fascist anyway but.....Now they ahve absorbed the Rino Party it does not bode well for the future in leftist America. (We're not sliding left we have arrived. Any government that can circle file civil rights and the Bill of Rights with an 85% approval vote out of the Senate is not heading left. They ARE left. So why do I need to go back to high school history classes? We already know they abandoned it before they invented the phrase at least back with Teddy Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson. Nothing new there.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    You asked the question:
    "Why did the left abandon democratic principles?"
    You must study the 1860-1890 period to find the answer.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    She'll be the thin Golden line to protect the emperor, Smart enough to recognize a domestic terrorist occupying the oval office.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I think I made a100% on that history of the last century - in the century what the Rino fascists are now is not what they were then even less what they were in 1776 or the late 1800s. What applies to their current supporters is the Patriot Act which now reads. ....suspicion of supporting......helll those folks are very open about supporting. So what does 1864 have to do with 2016? NOTHING!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    One party now, but the GOP was the statist Whigs renamed. The GOP crushed liberty via war and claimed to be liberators. The Dems were not allowed to participate at all unless they pledged alliegance to the state which was owned by the GOP.They were completely separate then and that was the scope of my comment. The Dems rebelled on a local state level until the "national" statists took direct control of state govs, too. Itb wasn't for civil rights. It was a power grab, plain and simple, with civil rights as an excuse.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Come to think of it the women have been refusing to take the path to power as long as I can remember and especially under the leadership of the Clintons. Rights yes, repsonsibilites No Cute butts over sexual predators yes any day of the week. They won't get equality unless, like now, they are dragged into it kicking and screaming by their hair.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    don't know about the Fascist GOP that being a left wing trait and they hadn't evolved into lapdogs of the socialist left by then, nor was it while your claim was ignored by the entire country for 150 years while the GOP supported civil rights and the left wing socialist fascists hold an unblemished anti civil rights record but what's your excuse from the Marxist Leninest camp these days? You need to get off that one track thinking and wake up they are the same party and the fascist left has killed a helluva lot more of us than the piss ant penny ante doo wops of the right wing OF THE LEFT.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 7 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Was it the only path left for them to power after the fascist GOP raped and destroyed individual liberty and states rights in 1860-1890?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by lrshultis 7 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Darn, I was trying not to offend with 'Congressmen', which in English would have meant both male and female Congress members. If idiots really do not want gender mentioned, wouldn't it be best to just use 'it' which would be non-genderist nonsense. Like 'the Congress-it preyed on its constituents for their life-blood', sorry, 'their' has 'he' in it. What do people do in other languages, like German or Russian, where all kinds of things do not strictly follow the gender of the object. Are people in those countries all having their minds freeze up over nothing?
    Remimds me of the 'It' at the my old University of Wisconsin in Madison who a few years ago made a stink that caused all kinds of trouble for an instructor who was stupid enough to use the word 'denigrate' because it thought that it somehow dissed the un-pinkish skinned.
    Wasn't there someone who said something about bringing down a society by messing up the language?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    II just finished up a post in another forum asking When did the left abandon democratic principles and 'representative democracy'? Then explained the reason for filling in polls etc for the next month or so as pro-libertarian. Got back to home base and found my State oriented U-Gov polling sheet and immediately became a Libertarian for it's purposes. It's one step for mankind in the two percent needed to get them in the debates OR expose the closed shop leftists only candidate system we now labor under and against. One of the other sites critical thinkers took me to task point by point. It was a fruitul profitable discussion. So the question remains? Why did the left abandon democratic principles? Granted they are anti indirect balloting of the type used in a Republic but now they are also against direct balloting. Strange?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    'Congress Persons is 'sexist.' Not to mention illiterate. A Congressional or the Congressionals does nicely without offending. Think about it and what the PC (for political crap) left has been getting away with these last few years.

    PerSON! PerSon? Is there a PerDaughter? I don't THINK so.

    Which reminds me when you enter a dining establishment or eatery of some sort and see a name tag starting with Wait Person get up and leave and explaint, "I don't wish to wait I would rather have service."

    Do you wonder why these idiots with terminal case of stupids are looked down on so much?


    Well Stupid is as stupid does and a terminal case of the stupids is cured only by someone with a Degree in Undertaking.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Dobrien 7 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Hah laughing can't help but think.
    They can draft my 12 1/2 year old Golden Retriever. She requires 21 hours of r and r a day. Oh And she panics at thunder or fireworks requiring a safe place..the other three hours she eats does her business and chases some rabbits then begs for belly rubs.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 7 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I guess since the concept of family and male/female sexes have been flushed down the toilet...they might as well draft everyone including monkeys , apes and sheep...the sheep are for those that have no idea what the hell they are. I doubt they'll get much fighting done...might cause global warming.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    After I I retired the Army started using Stress Cards. Things got to rough for hte snow fllake they whipped out a walk on water card and hit the snack bar. What was needed was DI tossing it on the ground and pissing on it. No room in combat for Pissy's
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 11 months ago
    Every Right has a Responsibilty regardless of sex, race, religion or level of education.

    2. The military just spent a ton of money coming up with ways to 'accommodate certain cultural and biological differences. So most of those questions have been addressed.

    3. The answer is either or. Either the entire draft system should be jettisoned and banned. My opinion as a regular professional soldier now retired) OR it should be completely equal unless it openly states mmmm for example certain women are exempted as national resources for breeding purposes. I hope that poured gas on your fire.

    4. It does address pregnancy under the new regulations but does not state how that improves national defense.

    5. Whatever is done must elevate women, like it or not, to first class citizenship no matter what Hillary and NOW think to the contrary. They should not be allowed to turn their backs on their sisters. nor should the rest of us do the same. But like the Quakers they should not be exempt from responsibilities as a special group.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 11 months ago
    Every Right has a Responsibilty regardless of sex, race, religion or level of education.

    2. The military just spent a ton of money coming up with ways to 'accommodate certain cultural and biological differences. So most of those questions have been addressed.

    3. The answer is either or. Either the entire draft system should be jettisoned and banned. My opinion as a regular professional soldier now retired) OR it should be completely equal unless it openly states mmmm for example certain women are exempted as national resources for breeding purposes. I hope that poured gas on your fire.

    4. It does address pregnancy under the new regulations but does not state how that improves national defense.

    5. Whatever is done must elevate women, like it or not, to first class citizenship no matter what Hillary and NOW think think to the contrary. They should not be allowed to turn their backs on their sisters. nor should the rest of us do the same. But like the Quakers they should not be an exempt from responsibilities special group.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by lrshultis 7 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Everyone has, so called, equal rights until government gets involved in prescribing rights as a means to cancel the rights of the citizens. Rights then become what the government permits rather than free choices by the citizens.
    Several decades ago, the fight against the draft was based mostly on the ninth amendment. The fight was nearly won but the desire to have slaves by part of the population ended in a special conscription law which could be used to provide more cannon fodder to make congress persons think that they are solving a problem.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Eyecu2 7 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    As I said IF AND ONLY IF the women have to live by EXACTLY the same standards. Of course in practice I have never seen that happen
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LibertyBelle 7 years, 11 months ago
    Not true; there is a place for women in the military,
    but it is of necessity a limited place; ignoring all the
    biological facts of women's not being as strong as men physically,etc., is bound to have a detrimental effect on the strength of the armed forces and the safety of the nation.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo