US Senator Openly Calls for dumping 'due process' and embraces fascist left principles. So why is he still a Senator?

Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 11 months ago to Government
54 comments | Share | Flag

US Senator: Get rid of due process — it’s “killing us”
6/16/2016 10:01:58 AM Ed Morrissey
0 Comments
So much for the oath to uphold the Constitution, eh? “Due process is what’s killing us right now,” said Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) on Morning Joe today in pushing for a bill to use secret watch lists to deny Americans civil rights. In
More..

After openly denying he oath of office and embracing leftist fascism has he not been summarily rejected and ejected from the Senate out of hand with no further ado? Is not a public confession admissable evidence of wrong doing? Shame on you Comrade Manchin. You are an self confessed traitor.

The Complete Article here or at the URL

on, eh? “Due process is what’s killing us right now,” said Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) on Morning Joe today in pushing for a bill to use secret watch lists to deny Americans civil rights. In place of due process, Manchin proposes a five-year suspension of civil rights and surveillance when the FBI fails to find anything wrong after “suspicion” arises … just to be safe, of course (via Stephen Green at Instapundit):

In fact, Manchin admits that the watch-list ban wouldn’t have worked to prevent the Orlando shooter from purchasing weapons, because the FBI had already taken him off those lists. That’s why Manchin proposes that the government simply remove civil rights for five years from anyone who’s been under FBI investigation:

MANCHIN: Really, the firewall we have right now is due process. It’s all due process. So we can all say we want the same thing, but how do we get there? If a person is on a terrorist watch list, like the gentleman, the shooter in Orlando? He was twice by the FBI — we were briefed yesterday about what happened — but that young man was brought in twice. They did everything they could. The FBI did everything they were supposed to do. But there was no way to keep him on the nix list or keep him off the gun-buy list, there was no way to do that.

So can’t we say that if a person’s under suspicion there should be a five-year period of time that we have to see if good behavior, if this person continues the same traits? Maybe we can come to that type of an agreement, but due process is what’s killing us right now.

What interesting times in which we live! Who would have guessed that we’d hear demands to demolish due process from liberals — and on national television? (Hint: Everyone, eventually.) Manchin doesn’t just want a watch-list ban — he wants law enforcement to decide who gets to exercise civil rights, and when.

If Manchin’s so keen on suspending explicit constitutional rights on the basis of suspicion, can we also eliminate the Fourth Amendment and conduct warrantless raids on people whom police suspect of being criminals? How about suspending the Fifth Amendment for people suspected of taking part in criminal conspiracies, or bypassing the Sixth Amendment rights to confront witnesses and defend one’s self in a court?

Actually, Manchin’s proposal would violate most of those, in one form or another, along with the Second Amendment.

Here’s a better idea — let’s allow the executive branch to seize the records of legislators that they think might be corrupt or undermining America. Let’s start with Joe Manchin! Who needs that pesky Constitution, anyway? It’s killing us, man! Official suspicion is so much better than due process, at least for those who aren’t the target of it.

This is precisely the slippery slope I warned about in my column for The Week:

The American system of justice relies on core principles based on a fundamental understanding of natural law. First, the Constitution exists to restrain government from encroaching on the rights of its sovereign citizens. Second, each citizen retains those civil rights unless a jury of their peers convicts them of violating the law. Third, each citizen is entitled to due process and a presumption of innocence from the government until conviction.

In the wake of the Orlando shooting, the familiar rush to use the no-fly and terror watch lists as a bar to owning a firearm violates every single one of these principles. …

In this proposal, Clinton and her allies call for an end to due process before denying citizens their constitutional right to bear arms. This is a far more fundamental issue than debating over which firearms to bar from private ownership; it strikes at the fundamental relationship between citizens and the government that exists to serve their liberty interests. Once those principles have been discarded for political expediency on the mere basis of official suspicion, no rights — whether natural or declared — will ever be safe again.

Joe Manchin let the mask slip today. Let’s hope that wakes up the rest of the country, before they find themselves the target of “suspicion” and spend five years — or the rest of their lives — dealing with the consequences of a government unmoored from due process.

If you can't do the job why are you not packing your stuff and why has your Governor not selected a successor.?

We really need recall in all 50 and including state employee delegates to the federal congress.


All Comments

  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Well why not they took them away from us and not too many really cared and still don't I am reminded of someone asking the Russians or maybe the Ukrainians or the Slovaks what they were going to do for a new government. The answer was we're going to translate yours since you aren't using it anymore. Twenty some years later here we are having switched places.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Stay in your dream world the rest of us are learning to live with reality. I'll stick the original comment was exactly right and I don't brook that sort gladly.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by livefree-NH 7 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Respectfully, Michael, I believe you are having a different conversation than the one I thought I was in. I have no idea what you are talking about, or with whom.

    That being said, this exchange is ended.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I thi'nk I already answered that fully and politely. If you insist. Yes it was your wording and no I couldn't change it in time having realized that and yes I did make mention of my error publicly if that doesn't make the temperature cooler in the kitchen I give up. My statement cut to the heart of the matter. They SAY 'has been under investigation.' What they mean is too often two different things. For example your use of civil rights after we've already lost those is a curious comment. Where was your comment on January First the day after what was left of those was taken? That Senator or his staff probably laughed and said, "Doesn't this (what's the word Obeyme uses) dumbie realizes we already took his civil rights and we will take anything else we want when we want?"

    Does 'suspicion of/' replacing probable cause help?

    Continuing to discuss things that doesn't exist anymore as if they were relevant truly doesn't help get them back. My apologies to NH if it was VT I wouldn't have bothered.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by livefree-NH 7 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I think you are calling me a fool, Michael. My comment was intended to mock the statement made by this US Senator who says that "anyone who's been under FBI investigation" should have their rights removed. My question, more fully worded, was "Then Senator, you must know that your presumptive nominee for President of the United States has recently also been investigated by the FBI. Are you proposing that she have her civil rights removed as well?"

    I'm not sure why you feel you can mock me or my name I use for this group, and I certainly do not know why you say I support living in chains.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Let's see use the name live free but seem to support living in chains. Fool! Anyone who has joined the military, works for the government, or held any kind of security clearance has been investigated by the FBI. I may be reading what you wrote wrong but this is just one more incident of the 'suspicion of' vs. probable cause rulings the Directorate of Internal State Security or 'protective echelon' is putting in place to protect itself. As for Hillary? She's on the other side of the fence from ordinary citizens - one of the despots another Eva or Evita. What about her? Doesn't apply.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by livefree-NH 7 years, 11 months ago
    "That’s why Manchin proposes that the government simply remove civil rights for five years from anyone who’s been under FBI investigation".. But what about Hillary?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 7 years, 11 months ago
    Why are a Lot of these creatures still senators?...you know the answer: can you say, (blank)?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 7 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    It doesn't matter. In the end its an elitist mentality of feudalism, with regional lords owing fealty to bigger regional lords all while keeping the serfs/peasants working so hard they can't even think of revolting or running their own lives.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 7 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    It's the due process side of the proposed restriction that has the ACLU up in arms (no pun intended). They've been against any of the Patriot act related laws from the start as a violation of 4th and 5th amendment rights. They've been shown to be correct that the no-fly list and the terrorist watch list have been abused and incompetently handled, with some on the list for highly questionable reasons, and others just by misidentification and name mixups.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Rabbit, Turtle and Buzzard inherit a plantation but nothing will grow. It wants fertilizer. Rabbit volunteers to fetch some. Two years later he returns. The place is a wonderland of green. Hmmmm they didn't wait. He asks the butler where are Turtle and Buzzard. Butler doesn't recognize scruffy manure hauling rabbit and remarks.
    Mr. Tourtelle is down by the well and Mr. Boozarde is out in the yard.
    Rabbit replies. Then go tell them that (keeping this short) that Mr. Rabid is here with the sxxt.
    It's a cajun joke I learned first trip to the southland. Also who takes over when the President dies? Answer The undertaker. Their humor is slightly the opposite of a good pinoy joke.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    National or International Socialists? I'm guessing the latter but there is so little difference it pays to ask.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 11 months ago
    I suppose - objectively speaking - the answer is get rid of Fascist Senators who are traitors to their oaths of office - they are killing us. What's Connectcutt's excuse this time?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 7 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Great question to ask him. Thanks for forcing him to deal with a small slice of reality!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Are they? I hadn't heard ACLU ever support any civil rights that had to do with supporting other issues such as second amendment they were even more against. Depends on what Soro's instructions are I suppose. George and Peter Lewis being their big sugar daddy's
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 7 years, 11 months ago
    Because his constituents are more of the same unConstitutional idiots.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by BrettScott 7 years, 11 months ago
    Our federal government loves extending U.S. rights to citizens of other countries and curtailing them for actual U.S. citizens.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    and all you have to do is decide which one of the establishment candidate wolves in shepherds clothing you wish to consider the lesser evils. Remember sheep are two croppers. Worse you can crop them the second time twice a year Spring Lamb and Fall mutton. First they get shorn,. Then they get slaughtered.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by sfdi1947 7 years, 11 months ago
    It's really pretty simple. Excepting 4, perhaps 5 Senators, and possibly as many as 35 to 40 Representatives, and almost all the Washington level and GS 15, OS 1 and all the ES Grade official bureaucrats along with a bunch of Local ones are ethically challenged.
    They are bought and paid for in ways that they can no longer walk away from.
    Nor should we expect any successful investigation or prosecution either, that system is corrupted as well.
    See the MSNBC Talking Head rant on YouTube? Watch it and pay attention, because its very, very true.
    Unfortunately we don't have a John Gault wandering around today. We today, no longer have a country, they have stolen it from us and they will try to use violence and fear to retain their power. Further, they will attempt to incarcerate all of us who do not respond to their direction. Why else would they all want to take our guns?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Dobrien 7 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    With tweets and texting the brainwashed need go no further to investigate any person or "issue" than a slogan or label. They have be taught not to go against the PC that's shoved down all our throats.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 7 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    and a cost/benefit analysis which passes the judgment
    of the heritage foundation's board? -- j
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by scojohnson 7 years, 11 months ago
    The left continuously refers to conservative Republicans as "jack booted", but lets' call a spade a spade. I'm pretty sure that Hitler, Mussolini, Mao Tse Tsung, and Stalin had their "Lists of people under suspicion". The left calls it 'suspicion of terrorism' and others simply called it sedition. In either case, disarming the populace would be the first and most necessary step. We need to resist this attack on liberty at all costs.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Whiy would you want to get off the list. First of all if if you are on the list and just fiddle farting around thinking of the wasted resources. Doing nothing and having done nothing alone would be a positive step. Secondly if they know who, what where, why and maybe how you are through using those resources they are not wondering whether or not to put you on and off and really banned from flying? That's a punishment? No - that's a reward. It might help that bus and train portions of the travel industry or some form of long distance uber and come with frequent uber awards, reduced prices, and fifty percent off at selected autoMac's with shower stops. That alone might save the economy of the country. $800 for a cruddy airplane ride or $200 for a nice scenic tour with luck OFF the freeways. Ubertels showers and so forth with connections to local sites then back on the next seat and onward. Take at least ten of the agents to follow and track one and using tracphones you could send them in the wrong direction by wiring in a solar charger.

    This is looking like a fun retirement if I have to go back.

    J"ust don't toss me in the VA Patch shuddered Brer Rabid!"

    "Why not Brer Tour Tell?"

    "Cause I forgot the punch line!"

    "Ask Brer Booze Aard."

    "Where is that scound rule?"

    "Out in the yard alookin' for the punch line."

    "Mr. Rabid had it."

    "I am Mr. Rabid where's the bucket?"

    Honestly none of you ever heard this joke before.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo