That boy was our last hope (no, there won't be another...)

Posted by strugatsky 7 years, 12 months ago to Politics
80 comments | Share | Flag

Seems that Libertarians are really LINO's - Libertarians In Name Only.

Watch the video starting at 30 sec. mark - and be amazed at the LINO's view of the 2nd Amendment. The "choice" is now between a dictator/socialist Trump, a Marxist moron Bernie, a member of the shitiest family in America - still un-convicted Hillary, and "I just want to be President" Johnson. There is a common threat between all of them, though - no philosophy or morals of any kind, among any of the prime flotsam in America.

Seems like all roads lead back to Hillary…. Heil Hillary, our next and last President!

All Comments

  • Posted by strugatsky 7 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The concept of socialism is to steal other people's money. To do that, it has to be implemented where other people have money. That's why it attaches itself to countries that were doing well and then sucks them dry. Think of it as a virus - it is not quite alive, for it can only live while killing its host. Then it goes dormant until it finds the next host.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by strugatsky 7 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I would fundamentally disagree with your statement above. First, the term "capitalism with a conscience." Capitalism is the most fair, equitable and productive system that humans have ever known. It has lifted several billion people out of abject poverty and misery that were the result of all other systems. Capitalism does not need a boost of "conscience" from other murderous systems.
    Second, Norway, NZ, etc., are socialist systems that are smart enough to allow a little bit of highly restricted semi free-market to boost their miserable socialist systems. They're also good at re-labeling propaganda, where the suffocating socialism is called "good," while the liberating capitalism is called "evil."
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by strugatsky 7 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    If a person changes his view based on Reason, then he should be able to present that reason. Trump never did. If Trump was making a mistake in the past, he, or anyone else, cannot correct that mistake unless he admits to it. Trump never did. But realistically, Trump was anti-2A at the age of 50. That is a mature age (for most people); at that age a person has as much knowledge as he'll ever have (for all practical purposes). If Trump needed another 20 years to mature..., well, that doesn't bode for him too well. The truth, of course, is that he is a statist whho made his money in a statist system, but now he calculated that he can get more disenfranchised votes than statist vegetables like Rubio and Ryan.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Those are your three choices the rest of us have other choices and have discussed them at length. Regurgitating; the same talking points again and again is good for wasting time I'll grant both of you that. But you could have read the files. The discussion started long before you bought your ticket.

    Once again. We suffer thorugh boredom...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Private schools are nice. I used schools to get laid and went to the library for an education .... remember who said that?

    It was true.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    What socialist system does not have that. You may not use Norway, NZ etc as they are a capitalist economy which has or plans to implement some socialist policies.

    in other words capitalism with a conscience.

    Go for it
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by strugatsky 7 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I had the benefit of private schooling, so the onset of government indoctrination was delayed for me. And socialism does not necessarily mean a direct command economy. The days of Stalin and Mao are over (I hope). Regulation and taxation are gentler, kinder means to accomplish the same goals.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 7 years, 12 months ago
    Too bad Trump cant get Gary Johnson as VP. The one thing trump CAN do is blast apart the establishment and leave a crack open for education of the populace in libertarian principles
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 7 years, 12 months ago
    Hillary is an evil witch who doesnt deserve to even live in the USA. She doesnt "fight for us" at all, she "fights for herself only". The sooner the people who vote for her realize that, the better.

    At least Trump tells it like it is. We know where he is coming from, and its from a lot better place than Hillary.

    Sanders tends to be honest and anti-establishment too, but he is a real wacko when it comes to government. He should go live in Venezuela for a while to see how socialism has worked out in practice....
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 7 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I respect your choice, but I don't agree.
    The video you cited appears to be a stump speech.for Trump. In it he says very little substantial. It is a typical political speech to please the audience without revealing any of his opinions on the topic. .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    So? With four socialist candidates according to what I read we've now pinned down the placement of Libertarians. They no longer I guess have floatability? (There's one gallon.) Trouble is that leaves zero candidates for those who view the constitution as the center and I noted the objectivist party is not associated with the objectivists or have their endorsement. That leaves all 257 of them. out in the cold.

    What next? Second Gallong?

    What would it take spell it out - if you can? What is your sacred ground what can be put aside until alter. If you have one.

    Third gallon.

    Really what difference is there that is so earth shakingly different it would entice me to vote for that particular movement. Please do not say vowels especially if you are Spanish speaker.

    Muy Vien.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 12 months ago
    If it starts going for cold embers I'll throw some more gas on the fire. GRIN
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by strugatsky 7 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    There is no mention at all, as far I know, anywhere in the Constitution, the Bill of Right or any relevant documents about the "right" to hunt. Only the right to defend yourself from enemies internal and external.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 7 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The Libertarian Party has a history of applying principles in choosing candidates. If that continues, then Johnson either changes his VP choice or loses his chance to run as a Libertarian. imo, Petersen is overjoyed by this and his candidacy odds just improved immensely.
    If Johnson relents, chooses a liberty-loving VP, and rationally explains his mis-step, then he can still prevail.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 7 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    That's the point. Trump hasn't proven anything about his alleged "change." Based on all his past statist tendencies including support for gun laws and this very narrowly framed comment that only supports carry weapons for those approved after an application for permission, I think he is a statist weasel who is carefully misleading people in order to get support from a large group of voters for which he has no respect. It is reasonable to use caution and not to accept without question what a politician says when he is running for office, especially when it conflicts with what he said before he was running for office.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 7 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Firearms are a necessity - correct. Learn their proper use and hope you never need to use them except to put holes in targets.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ChestyPuller 7 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Strug, You would have to be 80 yrs old to have avoided the gov't education that was designed to enslave you more over the creation of this system is over 103 yrs old when Woodrow Wilson first started working to implement it.

    On Socialism; you confuse Socialist and Capitalist; Capitalist needs to make a widget that is desirable and pay a wage that is acceptable to keep the needed quality of worker involved in production; whereas the socialist state just needs bodies to do what it wants when it wants...which is why it is so close to communism it is almost funny that people would want it.

    You can bad mouth Trump it is your right, but because the GOP was so weak it let a possible non-N-B-C run this republic [into the ground] for 8 yrs, remember it is said he was born on American soil, you want to give another corrupt politician, yes corrupt; he knows the U.S. Constitution by heart and as a 'lawyer' knows how law works as well.

    Enjoy your time..
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DeanStriker 7 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I'm with you, Herb. 50-some years back I did hunt squirrels, and then went hunting deer with a buddy. Saw only females (illegal targets there and then), pulled a bead on one just to see how it would feel, and knew I couldn't stand to pull the trigger. Unloaded by shooting a whiskey bottle way off in the woods, end of story.
    So in my book, guns are necessary for self-defense; less against criminals and much more against our Rulers.

    So
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hot_Black_Desiato 7 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Just to point out. Ayn Rand promoted "REASON".

    So I have to ask. Would you respect a person who changed his views based on REASON, or one who dogmatically sticks to a view regardless of information and fact?

    Next does running for President, mean by definition you MUST hold to 20 year old opinions regardless of said facts and changes in views based on REASON?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by strugatsky 7 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Well said. I viewed the Libertarian ticket as a philosophical protest. With a certified statist on the Libertarian ticket, the philosophy is out the window. Perhaps Johnson thought that so many people are dissatisfied with all the choices that he now has a realistic chance, so let's flush the philosophy, along with principles and morals, and squeeze into the mainstream. I think he misjudged.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 7 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I'd be much more comfortable with Trump if he had not been in favor of gun control in the past, and if he made it part of his platform to reverse all federal gun control laws to prove his committment to the real meaning of the 2nd amendment.
    I'd like to hear that from every candidate including Johnson or whoever is chosen at the Libertarian convention. If Johnson doesn't pick a non-statist VP, his Libertarian candidacy is finished.
    Trump's comment about concealed carry still leaves personal security as a priviledge controlled by unconstitutional federal laws. It's a red herring, not a support of the 2nd amendment.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hot_Black_Desiato 7 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Which picking a VP with that attitude, does not say much for Gary Johnson's personal judgement on personal liberties. That to me makes him totally unfit for President.

    "I also have a concealed-carry permit that allows me to carry a concealed weapon. I took the time and the effort to get that permit because the constitutional right to defend yourself doesn’t stop at the end of your driveway. That doesn’t apply just to me either. It applies to all our driveways or front doors. That’s why I’m very much in favor of making all concealed-carry permits valid in every state. Every state has its own driving test that residents have to pass before becoming licensed to drive. Those tests are different in many states, but once a state licenses you to drive, every other state recognizes that license as valid. If we can do that for driving— which is a privilege, not a right— then surely we can do that for concealed carry, which is a right, not a privilege. That seems logical to me. The Second Amendment has been under attack for a long time."
    Trump, Donald J.. Crippled America: How to Make America Great Again (Kindle Locations 1329-1336). Threshold Editions. Kindle Edition.

    Added Quotes
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo