The S(l)ick Minds Of The Left

Posted by j_IR1776wg 10 years ago to Politics
4 comments | Share | Flag

A fellow named Patrick Blanchfield wrote the following piece in The New York Times.
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/201...
Ellsworth Toohey would have approved. The first paragraph reads:

"Earlier this month, in Bunkerville, Nev., representatives of the Bureau of Land Management withdrew from a tense standoff with supporters of Cliven Bundy, a rancher who owes the federal government over $1 million in unpaid fees for allowing his cattle to graze on public land. The hundreds of self-appointed militia and “states’ rights” activists who flocked to support Bundy, many in full tactical gear and openly carrying assault rifles, blockaded a federal interstate and trained their weapons on B.L.M. employees who sought to negotiate with the rancher and his family. Fearful of a pitched gun battle, the B.L.M. departed, leaving Bundy and his supporters to celebrate, emboldened, with a barbecue."

Evil oozes forward propelled by lies and evasions.

THE LIE - the "self-appointed militia" were "openly carrying assault rifles..." Everyone knows that an "assault rifle" is defined as "...a selective fire (selective between semi-automatic, fully automatic and/or burst fire) rifle that uses an intermediate cartridge and a detachable magazine." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_ri....

These are illegal for civilians to own and none of these guys had one.

THE EVASION - "...B.L.M employees who sought to negotiate with the rancher and his family..." The estimates I've read were that the BLM had between 200 and 290 shooters armed with assault rifles, dressed in tactical gear driving Humvees. These negotiators also tased some Bundy family members. He choose to omit these facts from his narrative.

This only in the first paragraph! You can read the rest if you have the time to waste which, unfortunately, I do. It doesn't get any better. Like I said Ellsworth would be proud.


All Comments

  • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 10 years ago
    Hello j_IR1776wg,
    Thank you for the story. So the BLM was there to negotiate...for payment? at the point of a gun? What delusional nonsense. It would be nice to say "only in the NYTs", but we are all to familiar with the plethora of propaganda sources.
    Regards,
    O.A.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 10 years ago
    The military definition of an assault rifle that I read long ago also included the requirement that it support a bayonet... in other words, be suitable for "assault".
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by khalling 10 years ago
    It was chock full of misleading information. This man and so much of our urban society live in fear of firearms. That they are more frightened of an individual open carrying at a peaceful protest then a thug in a dar alleyway says so much about the brainwashing. Frankly I did not see any footage of "militants " with weapons drawn, did you? Gabby Gifford 's shooter was brought down by A firearm carrier. I also appreciated his tactic of referring to guns as if they were volitional creatures. Should guns have free speech? What nonsense. I also take issue with his statement is it alright to threaten with my firearm just because we 've made policies I don 't agree with? He frames it like there 'd be shoot -outs over every government law passed. But of course no one wants to discuss taking away rights affirmed by the Constitution. His fear shall not force me. Maybe he and so many others need firearm sensitivity training -their insensitive and uninformed opinions about firearms and their lawful owners.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 years ago in reply to this comment.
    "Frankly I did not see any footage of "militants " with weapons drawn, did you?"
    No. In that video taped showdown at the gate, all handguns were holstered and no rifles were leveled on our side.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo