Well said, and I fear it will play out as you have said.

As much as I hate the "wicked witch of the west" I really doubt we will ever see a prosecution. Yes she lied through her teeth....so did Obama....other than impeachment...I really don't see anything happening. I question whether it is even a crime for a politician to lie. Bottom line here.....the Obama justice department is not going to indite 1. Because it would smack of interfering with an election and 2. Because she has too much dirt on Obama. In the final analysis. Just as Dr. Ferris told Hank Reardon when Ferris wanted Hank to sell his steel to the state Science Institute. And Hank replied "if I do that I will break about ten of your laws" Faris replies "those laws don't matter for our friends" (or something like that, please excuse my guessing on the exact quote.) Bottom line here is there are different rules for people like Hillary and people like the rest of us.

Had to respond to the most relevant posting', benghazi WAS a GUN RUNNING PROGRAM! Ship loads of weapons were being delivered at the port, there were video documents showing this.... When barry stated 'arab spring' that was a coded message to RISE UP!!! for all this sprout in the spring, barry funded and supplied ISIS, destabilization of the mideast is the goal, that is why syria is in the sites' jordan is next, intel is avalable if folks just search and read.... Good for you jdg', dead men tell not the truth' that was the goal for all in the RENTED HOUSE (not embassey) to be silenced

That's the subject of the movie that the group "Citizens United" published, and Hillary brought about the bogus prosecution of the group in order to suppress it. Frankly, I'm astounded it hasn't been used and copied far and wide in this election campaign. Let's change that, now! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQKAa...

That topic was never anything but smoke and mirrors. It was never for one second plausible to anyone that the attack was a reaction to the film.

We know that there were CIA agents in Benghazi to make an arms deal with the rebels who became ISIS. Kind of stupid for Obama and Hillary to try to paper over that public fact by letting the embassy staff die, but that's exactly what happened.

As opposed to where? Hillary's private mail server?

All of the information regarding these events have been put into the Orwellian memory hole by the Obama administration and the history has been re-written.

Did anyone else notice this is actually two year old news? The date on the original article that this references is April 29, 2014. Freedom Outpost reposted it, making it seem as if it is new news.

I saw the video in question when it was still on YouTube. Was it "disrespectful of Islam?" Well, yes, but Monte Python has been very disrespectful of Christianity, and nobody seems to care about that. I actually thought the video was funny, in the same style as Monte Python. But, I could only take MP in short bits, like the old "Flying Circus" shows (half an hour each). The longer movies (like Life of Brian, Meaning of Life") were too much in one sitting. Childish? Yes. Disrespectful? Yes. Cause for murdering 4 Americans? Hell No! But, of course, the video wasn't what initiated the attack in the first place, was it?

Yes. See the long video linked here: http://freedomoutpost.com/government-...

The sheer breadth of scandals is stunning.

The evidence being leaked or not leaked to the public are the only foreseeable outcomes old dino can fathom.
I knew Nixon and the Clintons were crooks, but I never imagined such blatant corruption before the Obama regime cane slithering along.

I believe there is a documentary film coming out about the crookedness of the Clinton Foundation due to be released on the day of the democratic Convention. Should be interesting.

I hope you are right.
But there's always the "Never underestimate the stupidity of the citizenry" factor.(8 years of Obama).

Between this, the emails and Sanders' recent upset victory, it's possible that by convention time Hillary will be so weakened that she will not be the Democrat nominee. If faced with the likelihood of a Trump victory, many of her "superdelegates" might jump ship in favor of Sanders, Biden or someone else entirely.

Disgustingly true, but I still hope the old X-Files motto holds: "The truth is out there."

Excellent. Hope there is time and intestinal fortitude to drive these points home in the election.

Since the White House has successfully stone-walled the truth from getting out for more than 3 years, the mainscream press can now dismiss this as "old news", the same way they did with the Monica Blowinski scandal.

I don't think anyone doubted it, but having the proof to put before a judge is key. Clinton has already wriggled out of of so many investigations it's literally criminal.

IF (and it's a huge IF) Donald Trump becomes President, I believe he would press for Hillary's prosecution, but he would also have to get rid of Lynch (good riddance) before he could.

I wouldn't count your chickens, however. Trump faces a huge uphill climb in the Electoral College - with no clear policy positions (aside from maybe Trade) with which to differentiate himself from Clinton. And while Trump fires up his base, he needs the entire Republican voting base to come out - and they're not going to do that. I see Trump going down in a defeat in the Generals the likes of which are rivaled only by Reagan v Carter.

Did anyone in the Gulch doubt this for a moment?
Since we now know it will likely be Trump VS Clinton, I hope Trump, unlike Romney, has the stones to use this kind of stuff against her. It should be crystal clear, that if she's not indicted that the voters know that she should be in jail.

So, fast forward to 2017 when Donald Trump is sworn in as POTUS. What happens next? Could he afford to ignore the issue?