News Nugget: A Computer Will Replace You Too | Best of Cain

Posted by $ AJAshinoff 10 years ago to Economics
79 comments | Share | Flag

For the 10,000th time, Cain should have been President.


All Comments

  • Posted by strugatsky 9 years, 11 months ago
    Manufacturing Change was the most moving for me. The Affordable Health Care Law or the Common Good would make good ads. Approach them with it. I will leave a review.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Glad you enjoyed then. If you could, I can always use an amazon review. Glad to hear that the gun control story was there, Amazon has been kind of hit and miss with the updates. I'd be ecstatic if teh Tea Party ran with those as ads - but I won't hold my breath.
    Reply | Permalink  
    • strugatsky replied 9 years, 11 months ago
  • Posted by strugatsky 9 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Excellent! Very moving (perhaps because I can well relate to the stories). It would be interesting to use some of them for a series of short movies or even Tea Party ads. The gun control story is there.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 9 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yet, there have been "miraculous" remissions that are unexplainable by medical science. So, perhaps those laws of physics are being changed(?)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Just curious, when your done, please tell me if the story about gun control that I added a few months back is included. I'm trying to add stories every so often and amazon seems to have issue with substantial updated content, so I need confirmation.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Cancer is nothing more than a mutation of natural cells into something damaging/lethal to the human body. To me, It really doesn't align itself with changing physics (go back in time, slow the spin of the earth, make me fly, etc..), to God it would be more like an alignment. :)

    Thanks for taking a chance on my book. I'm pleased to know you are enjoying it. Which one did you pick up?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 9 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    As for the church buildings, I guess that depends on when they were built. As for church hierarchy, I don't pay much never-mind to it. Like I've said here (or perhaps elsewhere), I don't think that wearing vestments means one has the ear of God any more than the rest of us schlubs.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by strugatsky 9 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    If my mother had cancer due to certain physical aspects of her surroundings and her physiology, my prayer to God asking him to cure her would be the same as asking for his Laws of Physics being changed. I meant my question in that regard; not the "thanks" version.
    BTW - I downloaded your book and enjoying it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    My limited understanding.

    The purpose of prayer is giving thanks for what you've been given already. The asking for things (though I don't think changing physics is something many pray for) is an act of reliance. Pray to get picked for a better job, that your kid comes out of surgery, that your son gets on base at a ball game, or that you meet your bills are probably far more common than asking for physics to be changed.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by strugatsky 9 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Even if we accept the premise that God created the Universe and the Laws of Physics which govern it (and yes, then God is able to change them), isn't it a bit preposterous for a mortal human to ask God to change those laws in order to appease the human? Isn't that the purpose of a prayer?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by strugatsky 9 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes, I'm still holding my breath and waiting for the new Pope to have a clearance sale (give away?) at the Vatican... He's all for re-distribution (of other people's money).
    Back to intelligent design - neither theory can possibly be proven with the tools and the knowlege that humans have at the moment. I am not advocating either one. However, devoting much resources to the belief in God and, especially, the Church, is a tremendous anchor on human progress and well being. You mention the palaces that the bishops have built for themselves; drive through the poorer areas in the South and be amazed at the no-expense-spared churches towering over the trailer parks. It doesn't take a genius to see that there's something wrong with this picture.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 9 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Ah, but you made a statement of an hypothesis as to why a supreme being that created some 7 billion humans wouldn't want to care about each and every one of them. Certainly you have some theory. If you believe it is all fiction, why the comment? Certainly if something doesn't exist, I don't then go about theorizing about what could or couldn't be regarding that thing that doesn't exist. You made a statement for some reason, I'm merely curious as to what it was.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 9 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I have no theory on that. With all due respect, it's like asking me why we love Mickey Mouse, a mouse bigger than the biggest rat. To me, they're both fictional.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 9 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Not at all. I asked your theory why such an entity would not care about all his creatures.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 9 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    You are asking me to prove a negative. I can't do that and neither can anyone else. It's like I tell you that there are Coca-Cola factories on Venus, you say there aren't and I say prove it. This is in the realm of what you (and I) choose to believe. To me, the king of a universe which I described as being almost unimaginably vast, being concerned with each and every of earth's inhabitants seems beyond the pale, not to mention all of the possible sentient creatures that may exists elsewhere in the universe. I suspect, however, that where it really counts, you and I are in agreement when it comes to our dealings with our fellow man and the way in which that should be implemented. At least I hope so.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 9 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Why wouldn't an all expansive, all knowing, eternal God be concerned with the well-being of each of 7 billion individuals? What's your proof? Or at least what's your theory as to why? You seem to make absolute statements about something that you state is fictitious and I'm curious your rationale.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 9 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yeah, that's me, the heretic.

    You might find this funny. Every Archdiocese does a yearly fundraiser. I mailed mine back with two pennies taped to the card so that they knew who it was from with a note to see if they could recoup my contribution from the various archbishops that I enclosed news clippings from - one in Atlanta who built himself a 6000 sqft house, and another one in PA who added on to an already 4000 sqft house to the tune of several hundred thousand dollars. They actually sent me a thank you for the donation (which cost more to mail than the 2 cents).

    I like the structure of Catholicism it's how I was raised, but I have no illusions that the humans that make up the church are any more holy than I or have a more direct communication to God than do I.

    Unless and until something comes along that shows how inert matter could spontaneously become living matter, and how humans developed a capacity to think, then I'll keep my belief that it happened as a consequence of an all powerful deity. It's as logical and rational as not. And from a practical perspective, I've never found the argument that we all must respect one another and that's why we shouldn't use force against one another as a logical, rational, nor practical philosophy, particularly since it isn't borne out by history. No, I prefer the theory that there is a vengeful God who will smite those who behave in ways against his will (love one another) as that seems a more credible mechanism to ensure good behavior.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Interesting, but a God (I speak in Christian terms) who could create everything has created the physics of the universe He created, no? On that basis, God would be able to manipulate physics and reality as needed to suit His needs, no? Time. Who can say if the 7 days He spoke of in the Bible means seven rotations of the Earth or seven cycles around the Sun?

    I believe in God. I also believe we have only a fraction of an idea of who He really is and what His objectives are. This is my major sticking point with blind obedience to any faith (and I don't like having to say thank you 10,000 times a week). (I also think using He, could be moot since a strictly spiritual being would have no sex as we know it).
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by strugatsky 9 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    You must know that the Catholic Church would consider you a heretic! I, however, appreciate your view. As to all or most religions having much in common is traceable to at least Ra. Jesus, or, more precisely, the vision of Jesus as portrayed by Christianity, vs. the historical Jesus, has a great many features that have been borrowed from the Ancient Egyptians. Even the concepts of the Saints has been paralleled with Ancient Egypt. And, of course, from the Hebrew Jehovah. As for Islam, since the creation of that religion happened in relatively recent times, we know the details of it being imagined, how and why.
    I consider myself and Objectivist and perhaps I can answer why Objectivists are not friends with religions. More precisely, not friends with churches - that is the institutions of religions. A great example of that was actually expressed by a rabbi (can't recall his name), when he was asked to explain the difference between spirituality and religion. Spirituality, he said, is when Pocahontas goes into the woods, sits by a stream and contemplates her surroundings, the earth, the water, the sky, the meaning of lifeā€¦ Religion is when her local synagogue asks for 10%.
    Now, it is quite possible that an Intelligence created Life and, perhaps the Universe, or that part of it of which we are aware. Is highly unlikely that this Creation happened in six earth days, as described in the Genesis. More likely, a natural world, with its physical laws, came into existence. Thus, we are all subject to those laws, which may have been created by God. What I find curious is that people pray to the God in order to grant them their wishes (even if most noble), which would necessitate the breaking of those natural physical laws created by that same God. And only in order to satisfy the wish of that person. Amazing!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 9 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Altavista was great, until Yahoo took it over and made it less useful. Advanced searches by anything other than search.com find way too many hits.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo