Western lawmakers gather in Utah to talk federal land takeover

Posted by freedomforall 10 years ago to Government
27 comments | Share | Flag

‘It’s time’ » Lawmakers from 9 states gather in Utah, discuss ways to take control of federal lands.
SOURCE URL: http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/politics/57836973-90/utah-lands-lawmakers-federal.html.csp


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by $ Stormi 10 years ago
    I think it is past time these states take control of their lands. The Feds. only turn it over to the UN, or allow politicians access. Do we really need more of our US land declared UN Heritage Sites, with access limited? Do we really need hundreds of acres of buffer zone via taken private property for these sites. It's past time to stop this nonsense..
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by SRS66East 10 years ago
      I don't think any land should be a UN heritage site. We are not citizens of the U.N. The U.N. should have no control real or implied over U.S. territory.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ Stormi 10 years ago
        Completely agree! Hope the voters remember this got under full steam under the Clintons. We have been to the Grand Canyon, before and after the designation. Before, it was a natural at your own pace enjoyment, now it is herd mentality and control. We were at Glacier Natl. Park, MT as they were just getting ready to put up signs with the designation. The thought of a bunch of commies taking over our beautiful lands makes me sick.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 10 years ago
    No part of the Constitution is sacrosanct to the Obama regime. It has been trashed, smashed, squeezed and expanded in order to suit their agendas. As far as those in power in Washington is concerned, the document might not as well exist. So far, almost every article and especially the 1st 10 amendments have either been distorted or discarded.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Zenphamy 10 years ago
    There's no legality or words in the Constitution that will make the Feds turn over control of not only the land, but more - the resources on and under that land. The BLM was a part of Roosevelt's replacement of Constitutional governance with socialist and bureaucratic technocrat government accomplished in the 30's. It was sold to westerner's as the government's way of helping out the small ranchers in management and maintenance of open range and undesignated lands as well as a fight against the corruption of many western state legislators and cronies.

    Now it's just become another way for the Feds to suck money out of state coffers and pass gratuities to Congress's pals. I just doubt that the states have any oomph left in them to counter the Feds.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by iamA2u 10 years ago
    Unfortunately, though my heart is very much with the states, and in theory, yes this land should all go back to the States, I see some realistic issues. And we do, after all live, in the real world. The states actually did cede these lands to the federal government as blackmail for becoming states, so that will muddy the legal waters. Then, and maybe this is hypocritical, but I, for one, am not quite willing to give up all the national parks, which i think is a natural consequence of this line of thinking. Those parks are amazing pieces of natural heritage, but as in all things governmental, it has gone too far with all the conservation reserves and preserves and the national forests and all these quasi-eminent domain takings.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by amagi 10 years ago
    Thanks for posting this, freedomforall ! It's high
    time for the West to own their own land as per
    the Equal Footings Clause with the East.
    Someone once wrote: "Without land man is
    nothing." Of course, so let us support those willing to work towards this goal.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 10 years ago
    News reporter said the Bundy' s had "high power machine guns". Good grief!!!
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ Susanne 10 years ago
      Of course the reporter said this... good anti-gun pro-leftist propoganda sure to sell ad time to other leftist liberal corporations.

      I have 2 thoughts on this... one, do you really think the dotgov would *allow* the states to take over what they consider to be their soverign property? And two, what would ol' Harry Reid say about diminishing his empirical stake in Nevada? After all, all that Federal land there (and everywhere else) he considers as his. And NV, being mostly Federal land, well... Pretty easy to connect the dots when they glow so brilliantly...
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by LetsShrug 10 years ago
        The fact that they're even discussing it has to make him quake. He's trying to make a rancher out to be the antichrist or something in the hopes the State won't turn against him. blecht! I hope it turns into more than just talks. It needs to be stopped and should have been stopped a looooong time ago. State land should be run by the States. What's the point of having States?
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo