Republican Senator dumps on Trump
So, now the people inside the Beltway are telling us how to vote. I believe the electorate are fed up with the elites inside the beltway and that Trumps primary wins are the result of that dissatisfaction. I am not a Trump political fan and not saying I will vote for him but I am regarding the audacity of other politicians telling us what to do with our votes. To me that is why the standard US Citizen is upset with the political elites.
I certainly think Al Gore and John Kerry would have been worse.
Yes, it's possible for candidate C to win but the most likely scenario is that in the run up to the election people tell pollsters that C is their choice and C is no longer polling at 3%. When C goes into the actual election with a realistic shot -- vote as often as your conscience allows.
(to match Obama's gold plated golf cart.)
Isnt it also true though that an election like this to head up a currently statist country with so few principles would make it impossible for a principled person to actually operate within his principles. Remember Thompson asked John Galt to take over, and Galt refused to be "king".
This would be an argument to just withdraw from the whole thing, and just not vote at all if one was true to one's principles. Our constitution and laws are not principled at all at this point.
Voting based on principle is the thing that makes it possible for the people with ethics and principle to compete in elections. You admit that without support they can't win, and you refuse to support them because they can't win, Not rational. You will support someone without principles because he runs his mouth on problems but he has no detailed solutions, he claims politicians are not trustworthy, tells you that he should be trusted when he has a proven record of looting from the people. You are not thinking rationally.
Given that we dont have unlimited lives, it would seem prudent to try and make the best of what we actually CAN get. Voting on principle in today's culture is useless because the only way we would be able to get a principled person to win would be to convince multi multi multi millions of people to understand those principles and agree with them. You are trying to stand in the way of the tide coming in instead of waiting for the right moment to make your stand. Education at this point is the only thing to do that will accomplish anything, and there is a good argument that only an apocalypse will convince the required mass of humanity that statism isnt the way to go. Doesnt this make any sense to you??
Picking Trump over Hillary is like picking one terminal disease over another. His record of cronyism, inconsistency, lying, creepiness, and teenage behavior makes him no better than Hillary.
Our criticisms of Trump are equivalent to Hillary's in the minds of some Trump supporters. At least, drowning is not possible in the depth of that perception.
He had pull, millions from his relatives, and looted using government favors.
Again, you keep comparing Trump to other looters in a failed attempt to defend him. Compare him to the one you should be voting for instead, Gary Johnson.
Trump a stickler for details? Based on what evidence?
Commands respect? No, he demands unearned respect and insults anyone who doesn't agree with him regardless of how stupid his arguments are.
Purist? I want someone who defends the constitution as the oath the POTUS takes requires. I want someone who takes his own promises seriously, and will fulfill them. I want someone with ethics that opposes statism in actions, not just words. Trump fails on all these simple ethical requirements.
The reason we get evil looters is people don't vote on principle; they vote based on fear instilled by the GOP. I argue that we should vote on principle or we are at fault. You on the other hand won't vote on principle because other people won't. Do you have any principles?
Load more comments...