Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by dukem 10 years, 1 month ago
    I used to be vice president of a Homeowner's Association for a high end development in a liberal community in northern California. In general, HOA rules (which all buyers and renters agree to follow in order in order to live there) are very specific about what is and what is not permitted. Almost all of the time when we had a problem with a resident, the excuse was that "this is just not fair" or "this is too important an issue", or "I'm too important a person" to follow the rules. Of course there were sometimes varying interpretations, but generally it was black and white. It never failed to amaze me how many people would agree to something and then say they didn't understand it or didn't have time to read it, when their signature was on the document.

    That said, many HOA's provide a place where cranky people go to fight with each other, which is why I finally resigned.

    Lesson: When you knowingly give up your "rights" then don't complain when you have no "rights."
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
    • Posted by 10 years, 1 month ago
      So true. It's always amazing to me that people sign these things without reading or understanding them - or worse, with the belief that they can just violate them with impunity, just because they want to live there. If you can't follow the rules, then don't live there.
      On the other hand, it also is disturbing that there are HOA boards that decide to make up the rules as they go just because someone does something that they find objectionable. And since most other residents don't want to "rock the boat," they just stay out of the conflict.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by Herb7734 10 years, 1 month ago
        What in the world is wrong with you people? If a house or condo is what you want, in a neighborhood you like at a price you can afford but has a HOA rule(s) you can't abide, why not stand against it, provided, of course, you are right. Weigh the benefits against the bad rule and either buy or not, but don't wimp out if you have to fight for what's right. There's not much point to feeling morally superior but standing on the sidelines because you might get your hands dirty.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
        • Posted by 10 years, 1 month ago
          If you aren't a current owner, you are unlikely to get a hearing. If you can convince someone on the board that your position is right, they might take it up for you. But, if you purchase with the stipulation in place and are not successful in getting it changed, it was your own fault and you shouldn't blame the HOA for maintaining the rule. Buyer beware.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Stormi 10 years, 1 month ago
    We do the accounting for a group of over 100 condos. The problems seem to ebb and flow with the elected leadership. Lately, with two controlling women at the helm, it is one tempest in a teapot after another. It is petty and ongoing. Many older people just want a peaceful existence. We have decided we NEVER will go to a condo.
    Our rural subdivision, lots 1-5 acres, does have a homeowners association. It came in handy when developers for an adjacent parcel planned to tie into our sewage system for 80 new homes, and County Commissioners, in their ignorance were set to approve it. The Assoc. filled the chambers and fought it to its death. Had that not happened, the EPA would have shut down the system, and none of us would have had a place to live. However, another time, some liberal broad got on the board and was planning Paris street lights for the whole subdivision - most of the homes are rustic. That got put down as well, and she moved to Calif. where she fits right in. We do have other limitations, no horses (darn), no fenced in front yard, all garages must be attached (but they aren't). Mostly I like some rules, but loose ones.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by evlwhtguy 10 years, 1 month ago
    When you purchase a piece of property which is governed by a HOA you are contractually agreeing to abide by the deeds covenants and restrictions. If the board has a lot of flexibility in interpreting those covenants, you are screwed if you don’t like what they do and you don’t take time to be on the board. Bottom line though...YOU AGREED TO IT! Quit whining. If you don’t like it get on the board and change things. Now some boards control the board membership and it can be difficult to get on and if you do get there you are but one voice...but you can make life miserable for the board if you are willing to take the time. Decide if it is a ""hill you want to die on" and fight them...or just put up with it, because again.....YOU AGREED TO IT, WHAT IS IT ABOUT A CONTRACT YOU DIDN’T UNDERSTAND. My HOA messed with me and I made their life a living hell, they elected to stop messing with me after that now 15 years later. There are still things I don’t like but I put up with them. Everything in life is a choice.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by Herb7734 10 years, 1 month ago
      If the rules are used in a vindictive manner or are just plain unjust, then being on the board is essential if you want to change them or oust the vindictive nutcase. I've always believed that if you are able to right a wrong you should never sit by and let it happen. You might be next. If you agreed to a contract, you can work to change it. That's what the Constitutional amendments are all about.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by evlwhtguy 10 years, 1 month ago
        I agree with what you say but the constitution has nothing to do with a private contract. The constitution does not give us our rights. God does. The constitution only provides powers to government. It is essentially a list of “Negative Rights”. We do have a Bill of rights, but this was only put in as a compromise, the bill of rights are not the only rights we have and our rights are not granted by them. In any case, you can contract away "rights" as long as the contract is not in any way void. IE the constitution has absolutely nothing to do with a private contract. Let me give you an example. My Father was an Indentured servant. This is a recognized form of slavery. His mother [a widow] had no money to send him to secondary school so she indentured him to the DeHavland aircraft corporation for 4 years. During that time, he had to work for them and he could not leave. In return, he got an engineering education. This was a legal contract because the parties entering in to it could legally sign and everybody got something [IE: the contract was not one sided]
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
        • Posted by 10 years, 1 month ago
          I think they were merely saying that the constitution has been changed, so your HOA rules can be changed likewise.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by Herb7734 10 years, 1 month ago
            You got it Robbie. Actually, when we talk of HOA rules, we are not talking about righst but just the opposite. HOA rules limits the freedoms of homeowners in a certain area unlike the Constitution which limits the power of the government, which is why the Obama regime wants so desperately to remake it.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by evlwhtguy 10 years, 1 month ago
            I see your point. Although I will tell you that changing the covenants in a HOA are often as involved as a constitutional amendment. If anyone is curious as to how I handled my issue with my HOA here is what I did. I knocked on every door in the neighborhood and asked every neighbor if the wanted to be a party to my lawsuit against the board [they were trying to jack the dues up more than the COLA] By the time I got to the presidents house to ask him....[yes having a little brass helps]....he had already spent 45 minutes getting an earful from the neighbors. [not because they agreed with me, but because they realized that this was going to cost them to defend the suit.] Anyway, they decided after that not to violate the rate increase portion of the covenants again.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by RonC 10 years, 1 month ago
    If you are young enough to still be building your nest egg, condos are probably not for you. This is because while you are at work the older, retired residents, are holding HOA meetings to write the rules that tell you how to live. Since you are at work and cannot attend these meetings, you have no say. You will live by the rules or be forced out.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by overmanwarrior 10 years, 1 month ago
    Unless the group accepts a behavior, it cannot be done. Collectivism at its best. These homeowners associations are often the same type of idiots who vote for school levies. They are the kind of people who are the targets of people like Obama, and Clinton's UN driven organizatons for global centralization of authority. It starts in our neighborhoods with these HOA groups. I would never join one, and they wouldn't like me much. The whips make too much noise.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNlIT1I1b...

    There is a neighborhood near my house, but they can't do a damn thing about it. I've told them many, many, many times that if they don't like it, they can move.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by khalling 10 years, 1 month ago
      My first reaction is with you overman. HOAs always favor more control not less. But what if I pushed envelope. What if people were constantly having sex where it could be viewed from in front of the house or a large screen TV that was clearly visible from the street that was displaying porn 24/7.
      I think this seems innocuous however, and the association is behaving in a mean-spirited and petty way.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by overmanwarrior 10 years, 1 month ago
        There are many times where I have to undress on my front porch after I get caught riding motorcycles in thunderstorms. I don't track all those wet cloths into the house. There weren't homes across the street, until recently. It irks me that people move around me then expect me to change my habits, start complaining about naked hot tubing, all the bullwhip stuff, all the guns, and the motorcycle habits. It reminds me of the snoopy homeowners association. Certainly not for me.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by khalling 10 years, 1 month ago
          I try hard to stay out of my neighbors' way. and I like the same. Where I live, it's unusual to walk up to the front door and knock. You stand out on the road in front and whistle or call out. Many people have gates and fences (fence out policy) and put cow bells on the gate for people to ring. I like that. I hate answering the door ;)
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
        • Posted by 10 years, 1 month ago
          On the other hand, you could have purchased that land so that you wouldn't have had neighbors and wouldn't have had to change any habits. Now you do. As a civilized person with good manners, you will change to accommodate the new situation.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
    • Posted by 10 years, 1 month ago
      I prefer a HOA to a local government doing whatever they choose. At least the HOA is represented by me and my neighbors (or at least will be as soon as the rest of the lots are sold).
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ Mimi 10 years, 1 month ago
      I feel that way about the pink ribbon campaign. These organizations can write-off legally 90% of their donations for business expenses if they want. Seems like a scam to me. I certainly tired of looking at all the products on the shelves that support the ‘pink’.
      Some HOA have rules about advertising businesses. Perhaps they just saw this ribbon as just another peddler service. I know I would have. Technically, it may be in her home but it’s her neighbor’s who have to view it from the street.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
      • Posted by 10 years, 1 month ago
        Regardless of your personal assessment of the veracity of the organization, this is something inside the house. Last I understood, unless there's something specific in the HOA rules, this should be allowed.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ Mimi 10 years, 1 month ago
          Well if the HOA rules are you can’t advertise by way of putting a business sign in your yard or your window, the pink ribbon is questionable. Perhaps this chick works for Breast Cancer Awareness. I dk. The article is a little lean on information and one-sided.
          I know how HOA's can be intrusive. There is a by-law in our community that you can’t put any architectural structure, pond, or statue in your yard without committee approval. Most of the time it is ignored. Nobody cares. But this christian woman got bent out of shape because one of her neighbors had put out a little Buddhist stature in her yard. The Christian woman complained. The HOA President went around with his clipboard, approving everything he could find in everybody's yard instead of demanding the Buddhist statue be removed. Even a rubber-ducky floating in my neighbor's birdbath got approved. Lol.

          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Notperfect 10 years, 1 month ago
    That's the greatness of living in the area I reside in. The lots around my house were plotted by the owner where he resided in the house I live in. Mine is not plotted. When those around me found this out boy were they a little upset. I have a landing going into the lake right next to my property line. I was forced by one who took me to court and won to forget about using the landing. He also was trying to extend the wire fence to the corner of my garage where it would have blocked entrance into my drive. Being the house was built in 1960 it fell under the landmark law where he could not do as he wanted. Blocking me from using the landing to use the lake was his mistake. At the time I had been driving truck for about 20 years and I just built my own landing and told the gentleman that he could stop me from using the landing, but with my experience in driving I could my boats anywhere anytime on the lake from anyplace. Now the tables have turned and he is at war with his own family next to me and has been blocked from using the landing as he pleased. Want to know who he came to so he could get his pontoon in? I was not the first he came to I was the last, but how ironic what comes around usually comes back to bite you in the being nice, POSTERIOR. Should I gloat?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by monalisaturberville1957 10 years, 1 month ago
    Dear oh dear. Too many people that pay too much attention to their neighbors and less about themselves. This is past ridiculous.
    God help the person that ever tries to dictate what I have in my house. Hey are these morons Obooma friendly, he likes dictatorship, sure sounds as if these boobs do too.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
  • Posted by jneilschulman 10 years, 1 month ago
    My dad put a small pillow in a window to keep the sunlight off his eyes while he took an afternoon nap and we received a violation notice from the HOA's "architectual committee" for an unapproved window treatment.

    The HOA was run a bunch of maniacal tyrants who raised the fees every few months. I vowed never to live anywhere I needed to sign a CC&A ever again.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by MoFreeMoney 10 years, 1 month ago
    My wife has been on our HOA board in the safest city in the nation (over 100,000 pop) for 14 years. The rules are the rules. Unfortunately, due to a few rogue boards adding rules, state law makes it nearly impossible to change the rules. Instead the board practices selective enforcement. Example: we have a rule against running a business out of the home. When someone complains about “suspicious” people in idling cars in front of their house, the board is FORCED to send the piano teacher a letter to cover their butt. Another complaint, another letter. Has the guy ever been fined? No. But if someone opened a car repair business in their garage they would fine him out of existence. This appears to be the case with Linda Karp. I imagine they have a rule against things visible from the street. Her sign may be inside but still visible. IF someone complains the board is FORCED to send her a letter. Then, she made a federal case out of it, before realizing the rules give the board the ability to fine the guy with a Nazi flag in the window (inside his house) but not actually fine her.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Timelord 10 years, 1 month ago
    Yes, that is correct, but then sometimes the rules change - drastically. My mom's HOA wanted to hire a company to perform the HOA's functions, like survey and enforcement. It was going to raise the fee and possibly introduce an unaccountable bureaucracy. The community vote failed badly and the idea was scrapped - until one or two board members changed and they reintroduced it at a different time of year with a lot of strongarming. You can guess the results.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by DaveM49 10 years, 1 month ago
    My mother lives in an "association neighborhood". Which by and large fits in with her needs and wants quite well. However, if you are not retired and financially well-off, it's not a very comfortable place even to visit.

    When my father died in 2004, we put a Scottish flag on the garage so that family members would be able to find the house. Within 30 minutes, a very officious woman arrived at the door to inform my mother that the flag was in violation of "association rules". I informed her, without raising my voice, that if she would bend over, she could take the flag with her--pole and all. She did go away, however, my mother freaked out, my family joined in, and I wound up leaving shortly after.

    About six months later, the woman was kicked out of the homeowners' association after a series of similar incidents. My family has kept me at a dstance since. Ah, the joys of being right too soon.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by illucio 10 years, 1 month ago
    Civil Rights have progressively gone down the drain in the US, and this violation to private property and rights is proof of that. This "Big Brother" effect, catapulted with "The War On Terrorism" has very undiscretely stomped upon all, and privacy is now a luxury only the enforcers can uphold (which are a handfull only). Comunications and Information are registered everywhere and in all sorts of ways, and the excuse of "security" has permitted we be under control un everything. Credit Cards, Cell Phones, Car Alarms, Satellites, Internet, etc. are only some of the tools for this massive intelligence. Airport searches, random searches in rented appartments, hotels, and now even homes prove that we can be controlled by all, something the Catholic Church began doing with confessions back in the middle ages. To be free is to go off the grid, which sends us back to living in caves mainly. Only Galt could think of an optical device to block out the outside world from his Gulch. Me? I just don´t care, I´ve got nothing to hide.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo