12

What Happened to the Breakout Startup?

Posted by dbhalling 8 years, 5 months ago to Economics
41 comments | Share | Flag

"The number of fast-growing startups has been falling since 2000, leading to fewer jobs at dynamic new companies and possibly holding back the kind of technological diffusion that would lead to faster productivity gains across the economy."

The funny thing is they could have saved money and just bought my book The Decline and Fall of the American Entrepreneur for less than $20.


All Comments

  • Posted by $ blarman 8 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    "Of course such treaties stop being enforceable as soon as the two countries merge."

    Your reasoning being...? It is a contractual agreement. Neither Texas nor Montana have given up their status as governing bodies. They are both States within the group called the United States of America. The terms state that they can enjoy membership in the United States of America and are entitled to all the representation therein, and in return they are subject to the laws of the Constitution.

    "A state constitution that asserts a right to secede is a joke."

    Legally, it is no difference than a pre-nuptial agreement. Both sides agree to terms under which the deal may be nullified. And for both Montana and Texas, it is far from a laughing matter. Texas especially prides itself on its independent streak. Both Montana and Texas are probably two of the states most capable of self-determination as both have good energy reserves. Texas additionally has ready access to shipping.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jdg 8 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Texas' treaty of accession gave them both the right to secede, and (alternatively) the right to break Texas into up to five states.

    Of course such treaties stop being enforceable as soon as the two countries merge. A former nation that is no longer sovereign cannot have treaty rights.

    In Montana's case, of course, there wasn't even a treaty. Eastern Montana was part of the Louisiana Purchase; western Montana was part of the Oregon territory when we split it with the British, both well before statehood. A state constitution that asserts a right to secede is a joke.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 8 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I'd check their joining conditions very carefully. Montana has an explicit condition of membership citing protection of individual right to own firearms and it is an automatic term of succession if that right is revoked by the Federal Government. Many states carry such provisional riders, though I am not as familiar with Texas'.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 8 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I wondered. why only 30's and 40's? That's limited to certain skill and income ranges - absent a silver spoon I could do it because I chose a profession and it's risks with a twenty year retirement contract. My atttude was do it while you can and not regret it when you are too old." And then one that only demanded a certain minimum amount of time each year or so and retired at 43 with two breaks and then 65 and 65. Got to see much of the world including the Antarctic. After retirement the first destination was Easter Island and Robinson Crusoe Island. Quite interesting then up the coast of SA and picked up the Galapagos. I became one of the few to go all the way around and not write a book about it. That's a joke.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jlc 8 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    My point is that many of the people in their 30's and 40's do not want the 'gravy jobs' if these jobs mean working overtime. They do not want to work...they want to spend their time doing other things.

    Jan
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 8 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    One needs little overtime if you can get some of the gravy jobs like standby surgeon. Who often bill for much more than one standby situation at the same time. If none are needed the sky is limited only by the surgery list. If called to fill in the next on the list inherits. Another is the Xray readings people who do nothing but spend 10 seconds (I timed it once) as the second opinion reader. Next time you see that on your total medical bill imagine that dollar amount times six times sixty for an hours income. Normally the staff int he xray clinc set up the screens in advance. Now the new way is outsourcing the x-ray readings to India via the internet to cut costs...next time you see your hospital bill see if the costs have gone down.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 8 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    why should they?

    Remember the parable of the two brothers? What profit the risk taker when the profit is confiscated.?"

    My old Vo-Ag teacher solved the riddle. He found out Japan had no way of producing sufficient cattle feed especially for the famed Kobe Beef. He found that a certain area in the west produced the best hay but could not find a decent market. Then he noticed both were near the ocean one by the Columbia river...He also noticed car carriers from Japan operated on a tight schedule and went back empty.

    He found a Japanese business type and piroposed filling the empty and easily cleaned spaces with hay in either cubicle or the giant round bales which he would provide FOB to the Columbia River docks.The shipping company welcomed the extra revenue and he talked them into doing it for overhead costs one way. His Japanese partner took care of that end and the Japanese beef had a steady supply of munchies. The farmers were happy so it was the old find a need an fill it solution. As I recall the shipping company paid the longshoreman who went from unloading cars to loading hay. From school teacher to millionaire in a few short years.


    Someone else said why not bring Kobe beef production to the source of the food supply... it's now raised near the market area in the USA. But with out the profit that makes effort worth while ....he would still have been teaching school..oh yes and he gave many of his students jobs in the peak summer months...

    The equipment would have been otherwise idle.

    Anymore the exception rather than the rule. He said once his main advantage was very few employees. The farmers, transport workers (truck and shipping) all paid for those costs through their own companies. One of his sons had the abilties to check the hay for nourishment standards as one example. The son lessened the cost of his salary plus a substantial raise by convincing the Japanese they should do their own evaluation before the hay was loaded and he in turn would use their methods to assist the farmers in their production standards.

    Just a matter of making pieces of an unseen puzzle fit. Serendipity and Synergy. the sum of the parts were worth more than the parts separated. Providing no interference. that subtract value. Synergy minus VAT for example.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 8 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Well some body has to make the bichi burgers and you can't get more PC or ethnic than that. What wlse are they good for?

    My parents when they were alive asked why I didn't work in my degree field of Political Science and History. I remember choking back the laughter....my sister answered the question for me. "He can't afford to take the pay cut." I was at the time an Able Bodied Seaman working deck on a frieghters and tankers. When i calmed down and wiped the tears i said, "Seriously?" What's a degree got do with making money? At the time when things were fat in the industry I was working 16 hour days and actually working 13 seven days a week for four months plus straight through...union rules. sundays worked eight paid for 12. I worked eight months plus and drew unemployment of $500 to $700 every week the other two months with full medical coverage on or off the job. i'm trying to imagine a job in political science and history that pays that well. so my answer was, "Educations is for my own personal pleasure and use. it's a way to spend my off duty time." which led to working on my boat learning navigation which led to rediscovering science and mathematics.Did you know that navigation is just spherical trigonometry in motion and quite poetic in it's own right." But you have to settle for your skill levels and for some burger flipping is the limit as is sociology.

    . .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 8 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Completely agree.
    Wall Street pretends to protect widows and orphans while lining their pockets with their savings.
    Today it would be safer to buy stock in a company that sells its shares online (with rational due diligence) than to buy from a Wall Street legally devised con game.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • -1
    Posted by $ jdg 8 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I've read them and am not convinced. The only substantive assertions are that more patent applications are being rejected now than before (it's about time) and that "adapters of technology" are being favored over "creators of technology" (also good).
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 8 years, 5 months ago
    P.C. also equals the death of technological growth. -- j
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jdg 8 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Tell us about the "weakening" of the patent system. My experience is the opposite -- that so many patents, many of them un-called-for (too vague and/or the inventions happened much earlier), have been granted and then acquired by giant corporations that don't even use them except as bludgeons to threaten people with, that the patent system is no longer about innovation at all but is simply rent-seeking (an econ term).
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jdg 8 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I spent a year driving trucks, and burned out. (It isn't bad work, but it doesn't pay worth a darn.) It turns out I was about the industry average. I believe trucking will and should be one of the first and biggest uses of Google's self-driving vehicles.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 8 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The simplest way to do that would be to eliminate all the laws and regs related to securities. Eliminating the legal tender laws would be a good additional step.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 8 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    My experience is if the return and opportunity are there people will create start-ups. This is true even if they were raised under socialism, or the educational system sucked when they grew up, or if their parents were corporate lifers.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 8 years, 5 months ago
    I'll put it on my reading list if you'll put mine (The Fight for Conscious Human Life) on yours...I'm laughing...
    Your on my list...3 others ahead of you and still writing my second.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 8 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    It is a problem with the laws related to Wall Street. Until the mid 1920s there were not securities laws and companies were free to raise funding from however was interested. Every securities law passed entrenched the big players in Wall Street and hurt our economy.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 8 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I think this has a lot to do with the return people can expect as much as with the education system (which is abysmal)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jlc 8 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I am trying to differentiate between 'people cannot start companies' and 'people do not want to start companies'. (See my reply downstream, under Wm's post.) It would be interesting to know if the problem with current startups is now or if it is 40 years ago (probably 'both').

    Jan
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by blackswan 8 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Wall Street has been around for over 2 centuries, during which time we went from an agrarian to an industrial society. It's not Wall Street that's the problem. The problem is government. Period.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo