$1.17 trillion at zero percent interest? Trust the WSJ?!

Posted by plusaf 8 years, 7 months ago to Economics
16 comments | Share | Flag

MarketMinder's View:

"So conventional wisdom says hitting the debt ceiling makes the US a bigger credit risk and raises the likelihood of default, which should thus drive bond yields higher. Conventional wisdom is wrong, as it often is. Hitting the debt ceiling reduces the supply of US Treasurys, and demand is sky-high, so investors bid bond prices up and yields down.

This would not happen if there were a snowball’s chance of defaulting. What does the market know? Well, it knows Congress has raised the debt ceiling 109 times before. It also knows the 14th Amendment and judicial precedent force the Treasury to continue servicing debt with cash on hand and incoming tax revenue, which far outstrip interest costs, so even if Congress dithers a few months, Uncle Sam will keep paying his creditors.


All Comments

  • Posted by 8 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Thanks, SD, but somehow I don't think "cynics" is quite the right term... some others come to mind :)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 8 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    This was on my home page yesterday...
    http://www.plusaf.com/pix/homepagepix...

    And anyone who doubts our system beats almost all others is welcome to try to find a job... or food or home supply staples in Venezuela...
    Gone from bad to fucking impossible... Pity those Believers in Socialism.

    Roger that!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jdg 8 years, 7 months ago
    If "the market" were paying attention, they would be looking at Latin America, which is chock full of examples of what happens to a country that engages in runaway deficit spending.

    This "conventional wisdom is wrong" view is itself a big danger sign. Historically, it pops up again and again just before points of no return.

    Go, Lemmings, Go!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 8 years, 7 months ago
    I'm glad that some Gulchers are able to comprehend today's "economics." Whenever I attempt to get into it, I wind up feeling that I am trying to learn insanity or getting all covered in elephant droppings. If I need to know, I'll ask plusaf.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 8 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Not to mention the incentives for banks to NOT give loans to individuals OR companies because That Risk level is SO much higher than if they park all their 'stress test cash' with the Fed as notes... with guaranteed No Risk... no problem passing a 'stress test' there, but maybe a few unintended consequences for the US economy in total...

    Morons.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 8 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yeah, that pisses me off about the WSJ... as if their subscription revenues would decrease if they put some or all of their articles online... :(

    Might generate more paid subscribers.. but WTF do I know? :)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 8 years, 7 months ago
    Article only available to subscribers. Not to worry though, if its in the WSJ it's banking propaganda.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo