Cheating website subscribers included WH, Congress workers
Wow, lets seehere, your security clearance is based on a background check to make sure you do not have anything that can be used against you by a foreign power..except your AM account. Evidently, when Obamas gang is not busy making up new complicated laws to steal our money and freedom, they are trying to get laid, all on our dime. Nice...your government at work...or not...
Glad you enjoyed!
I can't help but think of Francisco d'Anconia's speech on sex, of which I will quote just a line:
"Well, the man who despises himself tries to gain self-esteem from sexual adventures–which can’t be done, because sex is not the cause, but an effect and an expression of a man’s sense of his own value.”
We had some great yucks reading the profiles and looking at the photos. Not a great-looking bunch of folks.
As for AM themselves, they are operating in a free (well, sorta) market, serving a market-defined need. People are going to screw, and AM gave them a discreet outlet to pursue their extramarital screwing. OK.
As for this going on from government computers, my main problem with that is this: We're paying those damn people to work, not mess around (play on words intentional) on hookup sites.
The site is good for a few laughs. That's about it.
We live in this Puritan America and people don't have outlets. They are expected to obey their spouse if they are in a marriage with no affection. What a mess. My wife has nothing to worry about. I have enough luck at the local Starbucks. (That last line is a joke). I'm really crazy about my wife, and love my kids...
two things: If a government employee had a heightened security clearance or access to sensitive security information, this would be not only an ethical violation, but perhaps even something criminal. Let's just say if I were a spy, seems like a great way to reach out to targets
2. govt employees using their government contact information and emails on such a site at the very least I would think breaks administrative protocol, but am not sure of that.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYwg4...
On her blog, IntentionalPrivacy, she has a long list of stories about the ways that we all just give ourselves away. On the other hand, just now, she is starting a new job and is filling out insurance forms. She called me for my information. Nothing sent in any email is ever secure. Just after that, following up on a lead with a recruiter, I called the recruiter on the phone to verbally give her information about my experience in some markets that I would not put in email.
(And no, the phone is not perfectly secure, either. I introduced speakers at a recent IEEE conference here in Austin, and one of the talks was from Carnegie-Mellon: they hacked Android phones to get access to the camera. Recently, another set of Android vulnerabilities was exposed.)
So, yes, it is like the Secret Service agents hiring prostitutes while in Columbia. But those scandals break in any and every administration.
If you have been to a doctor's office recently, they had you sign a form allowing them to share your information after "de-personalizing" it. What does that mean? I assure you that no one in the office can tell you. In fact, you can be identified by your ZIP Code + Date of Birth + Gender three data that are fundamental to any demographic study of medical information. So, no, we do not sign off on that. Millions of people - some of them in "sensitive" jobs - do. It is a problem, all right.