“Congress passed the Affordable Care Act to improve health insurance markets, not to destroy them. If at all possible, we must interpret the Act in a way that is consistent with the former, and avoids the latter.” -- for the SCOTUS majority
If that was true, the SCOTUS would have declared O-care completely void.
I should also have said that what they should have said was that it isn't a constitutional power of government to "improve health insurance markets" and then declared it null and void effective in 60 days. (That would tie in with the banking rules taking effect about Sept 1, so the banksters could blame the collapse on the SCOTUS (grin))
last November 4, we tried to change things. . didn't work out. . I'm afraid that secession like that which is described in the book which I edited last may be required::::
If that was true, the SCOTUS would have declared O-care completely void.
work out. . I'm afraid that secession like that which
is described in the book which I edited last may be
required::::
http://www.amazon.com/Unsustainable-Tuck...
-- j
.