So that's how the Islamics get around the anti-suicide ban in the Mohammed's best seller. I would have called it straight up murder. Interesting. I think the phrase that clouds perception is ...they chose to martyr themselves - or be executed.
I understand the distinction in legal structure. But when facing a gunman, the trapped unarmed victim faces the same risk of death whether the right to carry was removed by a localized gun-free zone, by a City Ordinance, a US State law, a US Fed law, or (perish the thought) some future global law system growing out of the UN monster.
Martyrdom is not suicide. Martyrdom is death of an individual at the hands of another, against the will of that individual. A suicide is at the will of the individual. Living in NYC and/or the District of Columbia is not suicide, but it is putting oneself in danger if they feel the world is right in those 'gun free' zones.
Side question. Isn't martyrdom another name for suicide? Since all suicides have a purpose even if only to the individual. Or in some parts of the world including New York City and Washington DC it could be considered a form of murder with a built in simultaneous form of capital punishment.
I view a "gun free zone" such as where that slaughter in a South Carolina to be nothing but a potential death trap for a shooter with issues. I avoid such places as much as I physically can. A so-called "gun free zone" should always require armed security of some sort.
This government is all about control. It hates allowing us citizens having freedom: freedom from regulations, free to purchase guns, free to buy a big gas guzzler of a vehicle, free to pursue our lives as we want to. Their antidote to every problem is more control, never understand the root cause, because control is really what they want.
The original topic was about state mandated "gun free zones". Some congregations willingly make themselves gun free zones. What is it about Christianity that draws pastors to think being a disarmed victim is a virtue?
Are they testing themselves before god? Are they thinking “God will protect us if we're worthy?” This magical thinking is getting congregations killed around the world.
There should be. The right not granted to the federal court was granted to the State Governments in many if not all fifty cases. Giving up or having the right and means of self defense revoked implies the State is 100% responsible and when having failed - culpable.
"Gun laws" have nothing to do with anyone's safety except those who are taking control. The fact that a church, school, or other organization complies is what they want so future "crises" will justify more "gun laws." Compliance with stupidity and evil leads only to tragedy for innocent people.
Once the feds made the move on schools it was open season on other common meeting places, although I see the point that schools are govt supported and churches are not. Govt meddlers gone mad, as usual.
Agree about the Dark Center. But again, even your second link doesn't apply here: it is about schools; the Charleston incident was a church. And our Federal government was not the first to impose gun control laws.
Thanks, that is true in specific instance but the feds invented gun free zones. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun-Free_S... imo, SC would not have it if not for the Dark Center "leadership."
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
But when facing a gunman, the trapped unarmed victim faces the same risk of death whether the right to carry was removed by a localized gun-free zone, by a City Ordinance, a US State law, a US Fed law, or (perish the thought) some future global law system growing out of the UN monster.
I avoid such places as much as I physically can.
A so-called "gun free zone" should always require armed security of some sort.
Are they testing themselves before god? Are they thinking “God will protect us if we're worthy?” This magical thinking is getting congregations killed around the world.
...no difference to the citizens not allowed to defend themselves
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun-Free_S...
imo, SC would not have it if not for the Dark Center "leadership."