This issue started before this administration, but these guys are more ready to be direct in its use.

2nd amendment is inadequate to protect against this level of government fraud and deceit.

This is the real zombie apocalypse. As the government zombies come to eat the country's providers, until nothing but zombies remain.

"Skirmish"? I think that word says it all. One would think that the underlying implication that "contempt of court" has different meanings for different kinds of entities would aggravate the left and the right equally.

Well, the story below is pretty close to it...

Dino, you are spot on. We in the gulch are considered outcasts and "non conformist" by the empire. Both parties are the opposite of the same coin, but still the same coin...I'm waiting for GW to be replaced by BHO or MLK soon, just because...

Indeed. And I can tell you, perjury is as flaccid as all the rest of the laws. My neighbor lost a case and tried bankruptcy. He was wildly fraudulent, and the Federal Attorney told me since there was only one claiment (me) that that was not worth pursuing. So, when I told him "now that you have defined small perjury, what is big, 2,3,4 or 5 claimants?", "How much perjury do you need?" He hung up. She needs a good lawyer. I think a lot of us may need good lawyers sometime in the future..just to escape their machinations. Like that case.

Says something about the state of the country and that people continue to stand for it. Soon it becomes the norm, then they get really nasty...A lot like the plot of AS eh?

When Ordered to consign to the Law of the Land, this administration and every government agency simply ignores the order, delays, shuffle their feet and ends up not having to comply. Is the court of our land that weak? Is the courts of our land complicit? If that were a private business or you and I...we'd be in jail. As I understand it, the irs is not beholden to our constitution...no more than the federal reserve.

Fair hearing? From a judicial branch that is corrupt and defends the unconstitutional on a daily basis?
I agree it would likely be easier to get an amendment to reverse the 16th abomination since there will likely never be a fair hearing.
Cui Bono.

The view that the 16th Amendment wasn't properly ratified has had a fair hearing in court and lost.

I, too, think we would be better off without the IRS or the taxes it enforces. But we'll need a new amendment to repeal the 16th, because most of it is legal (though they've certainly pushed the envelope).

Why are we depending on the court to straighten things out, when we elected the bastards who enacted the legislation without reading it?!?

It didn't start with Wilson, even though he put it in turbo drive. Teddy Roosevelt put it into high gear when he broke up Standard Oil. It actually began with the Clayton Act (which was enacted in the 1880s) and other laws meant to interfere with business and how it's run, particularly the anti-trust laws. Once the ground was laid, supporting government intervention in the economy, the sky became the limit, as we can see now, some 135 years later. Wilson, both Roosevelts, and many others just pushed the boat a little further down the river.

the corruption in D.C. is beyond belief. -- j
.

IRS = Gestapo. No rounding up people for death camps -- yet.

The IRS and the Big Brother alphabet soup of all those way too many other federal departments and agencies are currently the willing tools of his most corrupt royal Marxist-In-Chief excellency, the esteemed 2013 Lie of the Year Winner, El Presidebte O'Pinocchio, the most self-proclaimed transparent One to stick a last brick into Pink Floyd's The Wall.
All of those regime supporting replaceable (career job-scared?) servants are there for the Constitution-despising king's pleasure. Need more be explained?
Every once in a while little ole' retired me will send Judaical Watch a few bucks.
Why not? RINOs won't do anything about crimes committed against We The People by the IRS or even by a dangerous potential president like Benghazi Killary.

I just read an article about the IRS and an anti-IRS activist. Now I don't know whether she is correct in her assessment of who is really required to file tax returns (her husband created a documentary on the IRS and claims to have stumped the Director with asking for law concerning what legal statute or laws it has to enforce it directives), but I do believe she is going to jail for a very scary reason. Apparently the IRS has claimed she has filed falsified tax returns. So they called her into IRS court and presented her with an IRS filled out return. They ordered her to sign the return and she refused. She was ordered by the judge to do it and she said she would if she could add that she was signing under duress. The judge refused this and again ordered her to sign. She refused and was held in contempt and sentenced to 18 month in prison. Now I believe if I were in that same position, I would have to do the same thing since signing a tax return states "Under penalty of perjury" that everything included was true to the best of your knowldge. Well I am not signing anything that I didn't prepare (or hired a lawyer to prepare for me) if I am under threat of perjury.