Private Property Rights Are Good, But Only If You Beleive Like We Do...

Posted by MaxCasey 10 years, 4 months ago to News
49 comments | Share | Flag

"If any private business said “I won’t serve a customer because of his race or sexual orientation,” would that decision be allowed by government?" (Well we know from the Colorado Baker case that the answer is a big fat no) "Would Hollywood or the media elite take the business owner’s side? Of course not. So “private property rights” are extended only to people with the same views as Hollywood?" (when speaking of Duck Dynasty's Phil Robertson and the A&E decision to suspend him).

Why is it the Left/Liberals can't seem to get the contradiction even when pointed out? Is it pride? Anyone have any other glaring examples of contradictory policy coming from the mouths of Liberals?


All Comments

  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Boborobdos 10 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    My my.... So a right winger isn't allowed to beat his wife on his property.

    I'll bet that's a surprise to them.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • -1
    Posted by Boborobdos 10 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Power and control with anti-abortion efforts.

    Power and control with end of life issues.

    Power and control with recreational drug issues...

    Power and control with health insurance by corporations rather than individuals being able to decide.

    What about control by the individual?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • -1
    Posted by Boborobdos 10 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Blacks have not gotten reparations and nobody has justified the actions of the Syrians who perpetrated 911.

    Where do you get such stuff from?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by guidvce 10 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Along with the "race" card, and any other "card" they can come up with to avoid having facts to back their faux discussion/diatribe.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by livefree-NH 10 years, 4 months ago
    Any time when they say something like "we deserve it", such as acceding to the demands of blacks wanting reparations, or even justifying the actions of the 9/11 hijackers.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ stargeezer 10 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The Saiga 12 is a pretty nice shotgun, although it's pretty pricey around here due to shortages. I've got one that's pretty dressed up and it's had the trigger pack relocated back to the original place. The other one I've got is all stock. The way charter arms imported them.

    I prefer the AK47 location for fast action. If you are handy with tools and have a Tig welder you can buy a $40 kit and do the conversion yourself or a gunsmith will charge around $250-$300 for the job.

    Either way, they are great fun and a super good weapon for close in work.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Animal 10 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Interesting. I'll do some digging too - the Old Man could probably teach an intermediate-level college history course on the Civil War, maybe he knows something.

    If I find anything I'll post it here.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Zenphamy 10 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Animal; Haven't found the author yet, still searching. Might not have even been German, but here's the quote. I like it so I hope it holds up.

    "The author was a member of a group of foreign officers that had witnessed the bloody fighting at Gettysburg. Upon writing home one officer warned his government:
    “We must never fight these American’s for they fight without any regard to pain or
    death. Honor and victory are their only battle cries. I have seen whole regiments laid to waste only to see men from both sides readily step up to the battle line. An
    outside invader could never stand against such madmen.”"
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by livefree-NH 10 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    This is exactly the same principle as most gun laws. When I drive by someone who is texting and driving, it reminds me of watching someone who is playing at the gun range shooting tin cans off his kid's head. Society deals with these two situations in different ways, it seems.

    Oh yeah, here in NH it is illegal to text while driving, unless you are a cop. Tell me what message that sends!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 10 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I dunno. I have trouble with the AR's small round. I was surfing earlier looking for a pistol or ammunition that would transfer the energy to my target and then stop, and not penetrate walls. The one that came up as not penetrating walls was the .223 fired by the AR.

    Also saw a video review of the Saiga 223. Fairly cheap... but I'd probably go with the Saiga 12 if I had a choice and could afford either. My eyesight isn't what it used to be, and 100 yards would be extreme as far as my ability to be accurate, I think; at least without a scope, so I'd probably be better off with a 12 gauge and fighting at short range. I could be wrong, however; I'm far from an expert on the subject.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ stargeezer 10 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I'd have trouble deciding between a AR and a M14. It would depend on target, terrain and if I were humping it all day over field and mountain or is it riding in my truck. Long or short range, bush or Forrest.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Stormi 10 years, 4 months ago
    The left is full of contradictions. They say we must protect eagles, yet when the green energy agenda needs a boost, they say go, put in wind turbines, and forget they may wipe out those eagles.
    They liberals say we must leave the forest floor (ripe for fires) untouched, yet say nothing when HAARP continues to heat the ionosphere and change climate in unpredictable ways (and at what cost to taxpayers). The left tells us we must save energy and the environment with Mercury filled bulbs, but fail to mention they emit several other gases, are bad for humans and will cost a fortune to recycle as soon as everyone is stuck with using them. They did not even view the German study warning of the health dangers.
    Liberals pushed for easy mortgages, even when it led to financial disaster, yet at the same time support UN Agenda 21, which would do away with private property rights and the right to own a home, when fully implemented.
    Actors push for "green" homes for New Orleans residents, but then live in big mansions and use jet fuel for no other reason that to fly in special caviar for their enjoyment - not exactly green.
    The Prez and politicians are protected by armies of armed guards, yet would legislate away the right of citizens to own guns to protect themselves.
    The D.C. crowd carry on about first global warming, which fizzled and became "climate change", yet the Prez uses HAMP to change conditions (ask Christie about that one) and Pelosi had no problem filling the skies with pollution when she took two jets to Calif. when she was Speaker. Do as we say, not as we do.
    The D.C. bunch tell us to drive fuel efficient cars, while they take limos.
    Actually, the list is endless, and it shows that the left is both stupid and underestimates the intelligence of others.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by khalling 10 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    no laws needed to enforce reason ability. you drive-enforce safety belts in your vehicle. no police needed
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by plusaf 10 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    and I've thought for a long time that the "incentive" and repercussions aspect would work much better than any "government mandate or restrictions:"

    Just let the insurance companies add a clause or two that says that if you're texting while driving or are not wearing your seatbelt in an accident, some or all of your insurance coverage is forfeit.

    Works for me... I love my seat belts!
    Oh, and btw, do you know why it's as important that your back-seat passengers wear theirs? Y'see, if you're driving and hit something hard, your seat belt and air bags may save your life, but if the passenger sitting BEHIND you (or behind the future victim next to you up front) is NOT wearing their seat belt, they will smash into the BACK of your seat and essentially crush your chest with YOUR seatbelt. Low survivability.
    Think about it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by plusaf 10 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    and they seem to always play the "anarchy card" into any discussion they're losing.. :)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Rozar 10 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I've been thinking about this again. I'm going to have to send you a message in the next few days.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Animal 10 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Have you a name for this German general? I'm a pretty big Civil War buff and I don't recall that incident.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo