John McCain fell under provisions for military personnel working overseas, so any claim there is ridiculous. But nationality is not guaranteed just because one of your parents is American. See the controversy surrounding Ted Cruz and his birth in Canada to American parents. If not born in the United States, you actually have to submit paperwork showing that at least one of your parents is American and you have to state at that time you want citizenship or dual citizenship. It's a different process.

There is also the question about Barack Obama's attendance at Columbia (who won't release any of his records or transcripts) because at least one account has him as obtaining financial aid as a foreigner.

Do I think anything will come of it? No. I'd be ecstatic if it did (and the Supreme Court would be busy for months with the fallout), but the way things have been covered up (the convenient death of the Hawaii registrar) and obfuscated, I doubt we'll ever know the truth of the matter.

Oh, they vetted him all right. He was the embodiment of all that the press stood for. They only feigned objectivity. Isn't it ironic that journalists are called objective, and Objectivists are not?

Obama was perfectly vetted - according to standards of feelings preached in government schools and Ivy League universities..

Astute observation and well-worded last sentence.

We are not fat and happy, and we are not complacent either, but rather we are totally overwhelmed by tyranny.

NOBODY has time to keep up with all that as the prime human requirement is survival, while government steals half our earnings with taxation to maintain the Force and to redistribute to those who won't or often cannot survive on only half of what they work for and earn.

So those who are here at the Gulch are only seeking to escape it all, rather than getting rid of the problem.

Ask CG if he would have voted differently.

Had the voters known in 08 or 2012, I doubt would have made any difference whatsoever. There are too many eligible voters today that know absolutely nothing about anything to do with politics, which can be proven by testing them on the simplest historic topics. "What was the Civil War about?" "Ahhh, which one was that?" In order to vote everyone should be required to take a history class presented by Newt Gingrich, and then take a test to see if anything sunk in. Today, most political office winners are based on popularity. Candidates are especially learning that you can lie and tell the people what they want to hear, then after you're elected you can do any damn thing you please. And if your classed as a minority especially the people will not do anything more than complain about you. And there will always be those that will praise anything you do no matter what.

I got a real kick out of a listing of Hillary's accomplishments on left leaning site (I think it was a past post on the Gulch). It listed one of her accomplishments as, she was part of the legal team on Watergate that got rid of Richard Nixon. It grossly neglected to inform that she was fired from that team, because she was a liar, an unethical, dishonest lawyer, and she conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the Committee, and the rules of confidentiality. Need anyone say any more? It was probably the only accomplishment listed, the others were mostly just activities with no substance of fact.

In case you missed it: https://www.wbur.org/2015/03/19/hillary-...