Ayn Rand-Good For You, Bad For Everybody Else
the author is of course ignorant about Objectivism and pure Huffpost anti-producer. I commented. consider commenting. in order to not go crazy, just pick one thing she says and take that on. Let us know on this post if you do so we can like your comment. Battle! we have the world to win
Previous comments...
ations "benefiting"more from a workforce (mis)educated
by the government than they would be from work-
ers educated in privately-funded schools in a free-
enterprise system? And that about corporations
receiving big refunds? They wouldn't have got-
ten those refunds unless they had paid huge
taxes in the first place, would they? And as to
barriers to success, I don't think they would be
as huge or as rigid under a free, really free en-
terprise system as they are under the govern-
ment obstructions we have now.
As to paying voluntarily for the really proper
functions of government (which are mighty few)
that could be done in several ways; by contract
premiums at notarization (as Ayn Rand re-
marked in "Government Financing in a Free So-
ciety"; also by lotteries), and also, something
like the present sales tax, although voluntary;
simply tell the storeowner that if he doesn't
choose to pay it, the store's address will be put
into a computer, and if it is held up and he dials
911, he will be listed as having refused to co-
operate and he won't get the benefit of police
protection in that store; also, he won't get to
put the sticker in his window which states that
it is a store under police protections. Tradesmen
would mainly pay such a Law-Enforcement Fee
readily enough; especially as they wouldn't have
to put up with their money being poured down
such avenues as it is now.---But some people
don't care anything about justice or the truth.
you
mind
not
formatting
posts
like
this?
it
really
that
big
of
a
deal,
jdg?