Monsanto Employee Admits an Entire Department Exists to “Discredit” Scientists

Posted by freedomforall 9 years ago to Business
5 comments | Share | Flag

In a recent talk attended mostly by students hoping to get decent paying internships in their field, a student asked what the company was doing to negate “bad science” concerning their work.

Monsanto’s employee, Dr. William “Bill” Moar, who gives talks on Monsanto’s products to reassure everyone that they are safe, perhaps forgot the event was public when he openly revealed that Monsanto had:

“An entire department” (waving his arm for emphasis) dedicated to “debunking” science which disagreed with theirs.”

Likely, this is the first time a Monsanto employee has publicly admitted that they have immense political and financial weight to bear on scientists who dare to publish against them. Of course they don’t list this discrediting department anywhere on their website.
SOURCE URL: http://www.infowars.com/monsanto-employee-admits-an-entire-department-exists-to-discredit-scientists/


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by coaldigger 9 years ago
    This is bogus. There is nothing that anyone can say or do that is not disagreed with by someone else in any field. Scientists are particularly vulnerable to this because they deal in probabilities, not absolutes and they interpret the same data based on different criteria and come to different conclusions. They are also no more exempt to influencing their opinions than you and I. Without having advocates that defend their products against continual attacks companies like Monsanto would be unable to exist and we would lose all the good stuff along with the bad. The list of products that have been driven off the market by erroneous claims is long and costly. Every day we hear of "new" studies that reveal something that was previously thought harmful is no longer on the list BUT the toxin du jour is something else.

    There is no argument that some harm is caused by products with unintended consequences but it is impossible to know what is real with all the crying of wolf.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 9 years ago
      As you say, it is difficult to discern the truth. I prefer to have the conflicting data available to support both sides instead of only the propaganda of one vested interest. You criticize harshly when one side makes its case while the other side spends a fortune on advertising to do the same thing without criticism. When both sides have scientific studies to back their case and only one of the sides has a vested interest, why only criticize the one without vested interest? Aren't Monsanto's promotional efforts bogus?
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by coaldigger 9 years ago
        I do not believe that one side does not have a vested interest. If there is a claim of no vested interest then I believe I am hearing a case from someone that I know is a liar. I know what Monsanto's interest is and understand that they have incentive to favor the array of facts that support their case and that they have lawyers to advise them of the risks. It is my responsibility to determine if they have been blinded by short term profits in conflict with their own long term best interest.
        In the Washington Post today there is an article on the front page relaying the dilemma that the federal government is facing over publishing their new US Dietary Guidelines. Since 1984 they have used scare tactics to limit salt intake to 2300 mg, fudging every fact they could because it was in out best interest. Now scientist in the US and Canada have reached the conclusion that "There is no longer any valid basis for the current salt guidelines. So why are we still scaring people about salt." They recommend a reasonable of salt intake would be 9000 mg per day (A 161% increase). The government doesn't want to change the guidelines because it is embarrassing. The separate researchers published their findings because they received professional recognition for their papers. It is up to ME, and only ME to determine how much salt I use and what to put it on.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by khalling 9 years ago
        all sides in this game are in the game. There is a highly organized operation out there against GMOs. Their "belief" system is as strong as the global warming crowd. In fact, there is significant overlap. frankly, it's kinda sad that companies have to do unproductive activities such as this. I'm no fan of Monsanto. They are as crony as you get-but the anti-GMO crowd love their religion. shower me with golden rice
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo