16

Sociopath? Really???

Posted by Ragnell 9 years, 2 months ago to The Gulch: General
54 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

May I ask for input here? I very often hear Ayn Rand described as a sociopath by her detractors. This irks me no end. Can anyone enlighten me as to why this is the ad hominem attack of choice? How do you respond to this?


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by mccannon01 9 years, 2 months ago
    I've seen reference to this a long time ago. The moniker "sociopath" was used to describe Rand regarding her notes on the trial of the heinous murderer William Hickman in the late 1920s. It was a famous case which captured the attention of the entire country, including the attention of Ayn Rand, who made notes for possible future use in a novel. Her notes seemed to hold an admiration for the murderer himself (which she is falsely accused of having), but in fact were noting admiration for the cheekiness of the defendant. Essentially, if evil could have such chutzpah in defense of itself, why can't good? Now, note the trials of Howard Roark in The Fountainhead and Hank Rearden in Atlas Shrugged. The myth continues to this day but has been debunked decades ago.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 9 years, 2 months ago
      Thanks for bringing that up! I've always wondered. But I still don't quite understand the point about admiring his cheekiness. If I can derail my own thread a bit at this point, any more input about Hickman, and why she appeared to hold him in esteem?
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by mccannon01 9 years, 2 months ago
        Hi Ragnell.

        I wrote my post above from memory of seeing discussions on this topic in the past and doing some of my own research (Internet searches) to discover what the hoopla was all about. Simply put, some Rand detractors were insisting Rand had a sociopathic disorder because she scribbled some notes during the Hickman trial that seemed to have sympathy or even admiration towards Hickman. Such was not the case at all. The trial fascinated the whole country at the time, not just from the horror of the crime itself, but because a 20 year old could be so blatant in his defense. Rand simply noted what many others were seeing (hearing or reading actually, since there was no TV) as a possible use in a future novel. It was the "trial of the century", why wouldn't an astute author make some insightful observations and take a few notes? Rand detractors, of course, twisted the whole thing when Rands notes were published.

        Surf the Net on various points of the subject and you'll see lots of information pop up.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo