11

Do the math

Posted by H6163741 9 years, 2 months ago to Economics
78 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

So, it's tax time again, and again I am furious. Apparently, the federal and California governments believe that we make too much money. Unfortunately, 'too much money' is not enough to buy a house in Los Angeles, so we get royally screwed every April 15th. We are a family of three; my husband claims 1 on his W4, and I claim 0 AND have extra money taken out! I would love to go Galt, but I really do like my job. (I get to fight the looters!). I am seriously wondering if I should asking company to reduce my pay. Does anyone know the math formula? Is there some 'magic number' that will keep us from feeding the looters, but not so much that I become one?


All Comments

  • Posted by Ibecame 9 years, 2 months ago
    Don't reduce your Pay!!!!!!!! Just learn how to pay less taxes, do it legally and keep good records. You need to put together a plan to reduce your taxes. No I'm not kidding. Try this link: http://markjkohler.com/products/what-you.... My tax attorney has a book out called "What your CPA isn't Telling You". He has it in Paper, .pdf, and on audio. This is the only book on taxes that I know of that is actually fun to read or listen to.
    My disclaimer: Mark is my tax attorney, I am not an attorney or CPA. I do not get anything for referring this to you other than that I will be happy if it helps you. Good Luck
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 9 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    One more thought: lobbying should be a capital offense, with all the abusers hung along K street and left to rot as an example.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 9 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Oklahoma just instituted a system that requires a supermajority to change the tax base. OK has almost a flat tax, since it has about a 5% standard rate with a very low income start (<$15,000). The goal is to eventually eliminate the income tax by reducing it in proportion to growth in other state revenue sources. By making the requirement a supermajority, the Governor is automatically out of the loop, since the deal is already veto-proof.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ewv 9 years, 2 months ago
    It looks like you are talking about withholding in particular, not just total taxes paid. Regardless of exemptions you can specify the amount they withhold from your salary for taxes. If too little is withheld then you have to pay the difference on April 15, but that is better than the government taking out more than you owe all year without paying interest.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 9 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    and they think that this behavior is just natural,
    a normal response to opportunity!!! -- j

    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Icon 9 years, 2 months ago
    Move to a different state. The longer you stay there, the more moochers will be added to the rolls, and the higher your taxes will rise, to pay for all of the freebies, and high salaries of government workers, until your income puts you under the poverty line. Then you will be to broke to leave.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jdg 9 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    It's only "ridiculous" until you get surprised by a tax bill bigger than you expected. The tax code is being tinkered with all the time, and of course changes in your income situation can create surprises too.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jdg 9 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The big problem with the tax system is all the rent-seeking it attracts. (Rent-seeking is an economics term, it refers to the huge and expensive contest of lobbying to put special cases in the tax code. David Friedman explains why the money spent on doing this is a net loss to the whole economy.)

    I could go along with a flat tax, but what I'd want to do is fix not only the rate but all the details in the constitution, so this rent-seeking can no longer occur. Have an emergency method to raise the rate but make it hard enough to use (say, 2/3 of both houses + president's signature) that it won't happen without a real emergency.

    And don't let the politicians exempt themselves from it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by scojohnson 9 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Nah, I'd do something more creative like buy a farm, lease out the land to the neighbor and use the mortgage as a personal tax deduction and put the lease payments on a farm schedule. It's common in Northern California with the vineyards, almond farms, etc.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jdg 9 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    If you rent the place out, you deduct the mortgage payments as a business expense on Schedule E. There's no need to lie and I don't recommend it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by helmsman5 9 years, 2 months ago
    Thought OS was dumb the first time, but it has grown on me.. cavalier attitude, wrapping the fish, and remodeling initiative! Still makes me smile. Regards.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 9 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    A great compliment, but since I'm past 70 I doubt the media would let me get past that fact (even though my average family life span is over 90). If you think any of these are good ideas, push them hard with every honest politician (assuming you can find any), and get behind those you think you can support.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jlc 9 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    You are trapped between a rock of prior decisions and a hard place of not wanting to make changes that will negatively impact your current lifestyle - so any improvement you can make would seem to be marginal.

    Your original question was 'what was the magic number'. If that is the only option left for you, hire a good tax adviser and do what you can.

    Jan
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by airfredd22 9 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    That's rediculous. It requires financial discipline to claim the aprropriate dependents and if you are not disciplined than just put the difference of your real dependents and what you claim now in an interest bearing account. I agree with the writer who said that you are just giving the state and fed's extra money without getting any interets during the year.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by airfredd22 9 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    By definition, as an independent contractor she would no longer qualify for benefits as the iRS has strict definitions to qualify as a contractor.

    There are however a number of writeoffs that could be taken if contractor status is established. As an example, if you have at least 2 vehicles financed, by incorporating and placing the vehicles in the corporation, the interest would be deductable like the old days over 25 years ago. Since the first 3 years of auto financing is mostly interest, this could be a serious deduction.

    I would be happy to provide further information.

    Fred Speckmann
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 9 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Thanks, Jan. I actually get health insurance from my husband's employer, so that's not a problem. Unfortunately, in my field, it's pretty much s 40+ hrs/week gig. I have been in the business about 20 years, and I have never seen a part time position.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo