Hillary Clinton: We Have to Get Back To Compromise

Posted by khalling 10 years, 5 months ago to Politics
25 comments | Share | Flag

"There can be no compromise between a property owner and a burglar; offering the burglar a single teaspoon of one’s silverware would not be a compromise, but a total surrender—the recognition of his right to one’s property." The virtue of Selfishness

SOURCE URL: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/11/22/hillary_clinton_if_us_doesnt_get_act_together_world_will_de-americanize.html


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by DaveM49 10 years, 5 months ago
    What exactly does she want us (not her) to "compromise" now? Who is not already "compromising" practically every aspect of their lives already, at least as far as the government is concerned?

    I presume coming out of Hillary's mouth "compromise" is a code word for "let's squeeze some more blood out of a turnip". Sigh.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by starznbarz 10 years, 5 months ago
    "I prefer the word 'progressive,' which has a real American meaning, going back to the progressive era at the beginning of the 20th century. I consider myself a modern progressive." - Hillary Clinton.

    Do a little research about the early 20th century progressives. Tell everyone.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Stormi 10 years, 5 months ago
    I always felt Hillary was more brutal and ruthlessly devoted to socialism than was Bill, lethally so. If anyone doubts her agenda is any different from Obama, read her 92-page thesis glorifying their joint hero, Saul Alinsky. The only difference between Obama and Hillary is that she hires her dirty work done, and he is a mere puppet who can read. Hillary is for UN Agenda 21, she is a UN baby, lover of all things socialist, and that includes loss of property rights. I am sure it will be worded as a compromise to save the environment from some bogus menace.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by slrachford 10 years, 5 months ago
    The book by Dr. Anthony Napoleon "The Progressive Virus" talked about this dilemma. How the socialist progressive movement would use every move possible to control the narrative. Napoleon found one of the most powerful people in politics was H. Clinton. She has been a long and avid supporter of socialist values. Hope can be endless, freedom of choice is not.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by j_IR1776wg 10 years, 5 months ago
    Political discourse in America is now the Tower of Babel. How can any sentient adult fail to grasp the connection and truth of Homeowner::Burgler in AR's quote and Citizen::Government in America? How about we compromise with Washington; they cut federal spending and the federal workforce by 50% and we agree not to form a new government?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by bassboat 10 years, 5 months ago
    Compromise is the reason where we are now. The liberals have been playing the drop by drop water torture game of "compromising" only a 1% increase every year until they have stolen the country. We must have control of the 3 branches for several years without a Denis Hastert in the House and a Bush in the White House. We need people like Clarence Thomas to lead us out of the wilderness.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo