I think the crux of this story has to do with changes in legal determinations of parent. Old British law had an emphasis on marriage in determining parental rights. Bastards had a legal definition under the law. In US law, we have seen decisions that favor emotional appeal rather than enforcement of contractual rights. This blatant activism on the part of judges has lead countries to create convoluted agencies such as the "fertility regulator." But I have a question. Absent any contractual agreement (written not oral) including marriage, how would you determine parental rights/obligations?

Point forrr you! (With a snappy rrroll)

surely you had one Guinness when you wrote that

thanks for the video-we just had the pictures before
"I just donated genetic material, and that was it for me."
hahahahahahahaha
while he was getting the 411 on what to call "sperm" from his lawyer he should have asked the definition of "donated"

you made this LOOSENED UP comment one AFTERNOON on the original post:
http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/posts/da...

sadly, there are no pictures with this one-but there is a govt authority that sounds like something out of a novel and not actually in the real world. that counts for something, eh?

good, serious point DK. I guess I'll have to wait until this afternoon when you loosen up-

In honor of spring......LOL nice. Interesting problem.

This was a post a while ago, search it out, it was a pretty lively conversation :)

Anything with authority in the title should be avoided like the plague!

I like the "rrrr roll", too!

I'd say the US already beat them to the punch on this one http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/04/us/kansas-...

thatshould be "Great" not "Breat" but try it out! you get a little snappy r roll when you say it