Idiots tried to mess with Sheriff Clarke

Posted by Robbie53024 9 years, 4 months ago to News
56 comments | Share | Flag

These morons didn't know that the interstate highways are the responsibility of the MKE county sheriff - David Clarke - and not the Milwaukee police. He gave them no quarter and arrested 70+.

Look for riots in Milwaukee in the coming days as the DA has finally (8 mo's later) come to the conclusion that the police officer did not commit a crime in shooting Dontre. It is sad that this happened, but not a crime.


All Comments

  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 9 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Well, as Sheriff, Clarke doesn't have a lot of responsibility as far as economic policy, but generally he submits a budget for the sheriff's department that is constrained and focused on priorities. He is a faithful interpreter of the US and State constitutions and his department maintains law and order in a reasonable, fair, and impartial manner (such as I can determine based on reports - I don't live in MKE county, and have not had personal experience with the MKE county sheriff dpt). I listen to him speak on local and national media venues and saw him speak at a political event about a year and a half ago. So, yes, I believe that he fits the description of conservative as I presented it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 9 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I appreciate the clarification, though I retain several quibbles with respect to the claimed "freedom". I do have a question however: in your original post, you said that the gentleman in question was a "conservative". Did you mean that within the context of the definitions you just gave, or is he actually a libertarian? Because that was my original question.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Fish 9 years, 4 months ago
    "According to Nathaniel Hamilton, he and some of the other demonstrators were gathered on a freeway ramp. When authorities told them to leave, police began to arrest people before they could disperse, he said."
    So police was "unfair" because they did their job before the offenders could run away... funny.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 9 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Unlikely, but he's not in the mix. The cop was a MKE city cop and the DA (or rather the grand jury) is the one who made the decision not to indict - both white. But the DA is a dem and the mayor is a dem.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 9 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes. Saw him on Megyn Kelly's show last night. I was surprised that neither she nor Clarke talked any about the recent Milwaukee decision not to indict a police officer that killed a black man.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by starguy 9 years, 4 months ago
    Will the agitators try and play the "race card", with Sheriff Clarke?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 9 years, 4 months ago
    Ckarke has been on Fox and is absolutely first rate!
    Thanks, Robbie!!! -- j

    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 9 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Well, that was the thought, but the tracks from CHI to MKE already exist, so only the run to MAD would be new. Failure in logic was thinking that they could go highspeed. The route would only have very short sections where they could actually get up to speed, and the trip between MKE and MAD would not be any shorter than taking the bus. Total waste of money - but it was Federal money, and the former Gov (useless waste of oxygen) only wanted to spend money.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 9 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Actually, the police are trained to keep shooting until they feel the threat has subsided. In this case, less than 3 seconds is all it took to empty his clip. Probably difficult to determine a change in threat status in less than 3 seconds.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 9 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Well, straight line party voting isn't allowed in WI. That said, there are those who only look for a D and place their vote there. However, even in Milwaukee, Sheriff Clarke has a very good reputation as a law enforcement officer. He's a former MKE city cop and has been sheriff for quite a while.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 9 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Where were they in getting Dontre psychological help? They let him live on the streets. Expect a large settlement from the city to follow.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 9 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Not at all. Basically, liberals embrace social freedom and economic control, conservatives embrace economic freedom and social control, and libertarians embrace both social and economic freedom. There are differing views on foreign policy, with the anarcho wing preferring total non-interference (and totally open borders), where the more realistic wing understands that other nations may be hostile and so a military, diplomatic missions, and regulated borders are necessary.

    Then, there are us who consider ourselves Constitutional Libertarians. The constitution is first, and what it specifies is what government is limited in doing, and everything else should be left to free people to do as they will, so long as they don't violate the liberty of others. For us, for example, the idea of gay marriage is a non-sequitur, since the constitution does not specify marriage as a governmental role. Thus there is no role that gov't has in marriage - at most, it should be a religious matter. If a couple (of whatever sex and number) wanted to create a legal relationship, that should be handled by contract law.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 9 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    What was the thinking on the MKE-MAD train anyway? A local liberal told me it was to connect CHI-MKE-MAD, but I wonder.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 9 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I must have a different mental association with "conservative" than you do, then. In general, determining a person's political philosophy is simple. Ask where they stand on the following three issues: government spending/welfare state, gay marriage, and the foreign policy.

    Liberals embrace the first and second and think "negotiation" is the only acceptable tactic in the third.

    Libertarians eschew the first, embrace the second, and view non-involvement as the primary tactic in the third.

    Conservatives eschew both the first and second, and view foreign policy as "we won't commit the first offense, but we also won't let you commit the second."
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo