Homosexuality and Choice

Posted by Tuner38 10 years, 6 months ago to Culture
15 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

A recent study finds the correlation between identical twins and homosexuality doesn't support Same sex attraction is genetic. Although this then introduces choice the author of an article on these findings dismisses this as an alternative because eh doesn't differentiate between rational choice and irrational ( whim ) choice. These findings certainly cast a new light on what has been accepted as true.

READ ARTICLE: http://www.hollanddavis.com/?p=3647


All Comments

  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 10 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Wow, weird. You mean one turned out homosexual and the other turned out homosexual? Who'da guessed?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 10 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    homosexual geese? They probably didn't watch pornography, they probably just hung out with leftist humans.

    When a dog humps another, it's dominance, not homosexuality. When a female dog humps your leg, it's dominance, not homosexuality.

    Lots of the alleged homosexuality in the animal kingdom is not, in fact, homosexuality.

    And so what if there are homosexual geese? It doesn't matter if it's a genetic flaw or a learned perversity... there's something wrong with that goose. Or person.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 10 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Pot. Kettle. Black.

    It doesn't matter if it's genetic or not. Type one diabetes is passed genetically. Still requires treatment.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ Maphesdus 10 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Great post. It always amuses me how opponents of LGBT issues are almost always using information that is either wrong or outdated. What's worse, they have the gall to label their findings as "science," when in reality they're nothing more than pseudo-science.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ MikeMarotta 10 years, 6 months ago
    Thanks for the link. The flaws in this come specifically from ignoring EPIGENETICS. We grant volition as a factor, certainly. As I said above, teenage twins differentiate themselves on purpose.

    However, the Pastor Holland Davis is wrong when he says: "Because identical twins are always genetically identical, homosexuality cannot be genetically dictated. “No-one is born gay,” he notes. “The predominant things that create homosexuality in one identical twin and not in the other have to be post-birth factors.”

    Indeed not. We know of factors that affect one twin but not the other that are linked to changes that occur after conception but before birth.

    DNA is just the CORE, and attached to it, layers and layers deep are other chemicals that turn on or turn off gene expressions. Read about the Dutch Hunger Winter. The affects were inherited across two generations -- but only in SOME individuals. More on all that later. Just for now, based on current knowledge of inheritance, these claims are 50 years behind the science upon which they purport to rely.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo