At some point Mimi....At some point... maybe again someday.

Comrade citizens, you are instructed to click the link to partake of your fair share of spread around state-sponsored rationality--

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=402xHwQG....

Exactly, no conclusions just questions.

I was in error below, it was called "the Baghdad Battery" and it was proven as a concept (note the word concept):
The Discovery Channel program MythBusters built replicas of the jars to see if it was indeed possible for them to have been used for electroplating or electrostimulation. On MythBusters' 29th episode (March 23, 2005), ten hand-made terracotta jars were fitted to act as batteries. Lemon juice was chosen as the electrolyte to activate the electrochemical reaction between the copper and iron. Connected in series, the batteries produced 4 volts of electricity. When linked in series the cells had sufficient power to electroplate a small token.[5]
Of course this does NOT prove that was what it was, nor that it was used, it only proved that the concept could work. The problem with all exploration and archeology is that they never get it all, there is always something missed or destroyed. I would say there are enough strange things found to always be able to say "we just don't know". There has been a large numbers of sites found under water in the last few years, at the mouth of the Nile, off Okinawa, and one I just saw in 6 feet of water that was a Greek center of commerce, complete with kilns and pottery facilities. The Ice age had dropped ocean levels up to a hundred feet, so there are sites we have yet to find or explore.

It may be, but such arguments have been used against others such as Von Daniken, and yet have been proven to work. Have you even seen the Egyptian Battery? There are indications in some Pyramid illustrations they used electric light to do their work, and they built one exactly as described and it worked. Also, there are no soot deposits inside the Pyramids, as well as certain ways the hallways and chambers are made that do not fit the "20,000 slaves" model. This guy makes a decent, reasoned argument. The physiological differences alone (2 plates versus 3) alone merits serious study, but as long as mainstream science sticks to it's "our way or the highway" philosophy, true investigations will always be relegated to the "junk science" or "pseudo science" label. I am reading a book called "We have never been alone" that makes a very good argument for advanced beings in the past that were here and are the root of all major religions. A lot of the great epic stories have a common theme, and were written thousands of years ago, and I have seen how American Indian "legends" of the Northwest were the impetus for a scientifically proven theory that the Pacific Northwest has been subjected to huge earthquakes from the Cascadia subduction zone. They even were able to get the exact dates from the Japanese "Orphan Tsunami" records, January 1700. Don't be so quick to dismiss that which does not fit current knowledge to be fantasy, the mainstream geologists found that out with Plate Tectonic theory in the 50's and the 60's (which was also called "junk").